| American Jews sympathetic to Israel dominate
key positions in all areas of our government
where decisions are made regarding the Middle
East. This being the case, is there any hope of
ever changing U.S. policy? American Presidents as
well as most members of Congress support Israel -
and they know why. U.S. Jews sympathetic to
Israel donate lavishly to their campaign coffers.
. The answer to achieving an even-handed
Middle East policy might lie elsewhereamong
those who support Israel but don't really know
why. This group is the vast majority of
Americans. They are well-meaning, fair-minded
Christians who feel bonded to Israel - and
Zionism - often from atavistic feelings,
in some cases dating from childhood.
I am one of those. I grew up listening to
stories of a mystical, allegorical, spiritual
Israel. This was before a modern political entity
with the same name appeared on our maps. I
attended Sunday School and watched an instructor
draw down window- type shades to show maps of the
Holy Land. I imbibed stories of a Good and Chosen
people who fought against their Bad
"unChosen" enemies.
In my early 20s, I began traveling the world,
earning my living as a writer. I came to the
subject of the Middle East rather late in my
career. I was sadly lacking in knowledge
regarding the area. About all I knew was what I
had learned in Sunday School.
And typical of many U.S. Christians, I somehow
considered a modern state created in 1948 as a
homeland for Jews persecuted under the Nazis as a
replica of the spiritual, mystical Israel I heard
about as a child. When in 1979 I initially went
to Jerusalem, I planned to write about the three
great monotheistic religions and leave out
politics. "Not write about politics?"
scoffed one Palestinian, smoking a waterpipe in
the Old Walled City. "We eat politics,
morning, noon and night!"
As I would learn, the politics is about land,
and the co-claimants to that land: the indigenous
Palestinians who have lived there for 2,000 years
and the Jews who started arriving in large
numbers after the Second World War. By living
among Israeli Jews as well as Palestinian
Christians and Muslims, I saw, heard, smelled,
experienced the police state tactics Israelis use
against Palestinians.
My research led to a book entitled Journey to
Jerusalem. My journey not only was enlightening
to me as regards Israel, but also I came to a
deeper, and sadder, understanding of my own
country. I say sadder understanding because I
began to see that, in Middle East politics, we
the people are not making the decisions, but
rather that supporters of Israel are doing so.
And typical of most Americans, I tended to think
the U.S. media was "free" to print news
impartially.
"It shouldn't be published. It's
anti-Israel."
In the late 1970s, when I first went to
Jerusalem, I was unaware that editors could and
would classify "news" depending on who
was doing what to whom. On my initial visit to
Israel-Palestine, I had interviewed dozens of
young Palestinian men. About one in four related
stories of torture.
Israeli police had come in the night, dragged
them from their beds and placed hoods over their
heads. Then in jails the Israelis had kept them
in isolation, besieged them with loud, incessant
noises, hung them upside down and had
sadistically mutilated their genitals. I had not
read such stories in the U.S. media. Wasn't it
news? Obviously, I naively thought, U.S. editors
simply didn't know it was happening.
On a trip to Washington, DC, I hand-delivered
a letter to Frank Mankiewicz, then head of the
public radio station WETA. I explained I had
taped interviews with Palestinians who had been
brutally tortured. And I'd make them available to
him. I got no reply. I made several phone calls.
Eventually I was put through to a public
relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who said my letter
had been lost. I wrote again. In time I began to
realize what I hadn't known: had it been Jews who
were strung up and tortured, it would be news.
But interviews with tortured Arabs were
"lost" at WETA.
The process of getting my book Journey to
Jerusalem published also was a learning
experience. Bill Griffin, who signed a contract
with me on behalf of MacMillan Publishing
Company, was a former Roman Cath olic priest. He
assured me that no one other than himself would
edit the book. As I researched the book, making
several trips to Israel and Palestine, I met
frequently with Griffin, showing him sample
chapters. "Terrific," he said of my
material.
The day the book was scheduled to be
published, I went to visit MacMillan's. Checking
in at a reception desk, I spotted Griffin across
a room, cleaning out his desk. His secretary
Margie came to greet me. In tears, she whispered
for me to meet her in the ladies room. When we
were alone, she confided, "He's been
fired." She indicated it was because he had
signed a contract for a book that was sympathetic
to Palestinians. Griffin, she said, had no time
to see me.
Later, I met with another MacMillan official,
William Curry. "I was told to take your
manuscript to the Israeli Embassy, to let them
read it for mistakes," he told me.
"They were not pleased. They asked me,
"You are not going to publish this book, are
you?" I asked, "Were there
mistakes?" "Not mistakes as such. But
it shouldn't be published. It's
anti-Israel."
Somehow, despite obstacles to prevent it, the
presses had started rolling. After its
publication in 1980, I was invited to speak in a
number of churches. Christians generally reacted
with disbelief. Back then, there was little or no
coverage of Israeli land confiscation, demolition
of Palestinian homes, wan ton arrests and torture
of Palestinian civilians.
The Same Question
Speaking of these injustices, I invariably heard
the same question, "How come I didn't know
this?" Or someone might ask, "But I
haven't read about that in my newspaper." To
these church audiences, I related my own learning
experience, that of seeing hordes of U.S.
correspondents covering a relatively tiny state.
I pointed out that I had not seen so many
reporters in world capitals such as Beijing,
Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris. Why, I asked, did a
small state with a 1980 population of only four
million warrant more reporters than China, with a
billion people?
I also linked this query with my findings that
The New York Times , The Wall Street Journal, The
Washington Post - and most of our nation's
print media - are owned and/or controlled by Jews
supportive of Israel. It was for this reason, I
deduced, that they sent so many reporters to
cover Israel - and to do so largely from
the Israeli point of view.
My learning experiences also included coming
to realize how easily I could lose a Jewish
friend if I criticized the Jewish state. I could
with impunity criticize France, England, Russia,
even the United States. And any aspect of life in
America. But not the Jewish state. I lost more
Jewish friends than one after the publication of
Journey to Jerusalem - all sad losses for
me and one, perhaps, saddest of all.
In the 1960s and 1970s, before going to the
Middle East, I had written about the plight of
blacks in a book entitled Soul Sister, and the
plight of American Indians in a book entitled
Bessie Yellowhair, and the problems endured by
undocumented workers crossing from Mexico in The
Illegals. These books had come to the attention
of the "mother" of The New York Times,
Mrs. Arthur Hays Sulzberger.
Her father had started the newspaper, then her
husband ran it, and in the years that I knew her,
her son was the publisher. She invited me to her
fashionable apartment on Fifth Avenue for lunches
and dinner parties. And, on many occasions, I was
a weekend guest at her Greenwich, Conn. home.
She was liberal-minded and praised my efforts
to speak for the underdog, even going so far in
one letter to say, "You are the most
remarkable woman I ever knew." I had little
concept that from being buoyed so high I could be
dropped so suddenly when I discovered -
from her point of view - the
"wrong" underdog.
As it happened, I was a weekend guest in her
spacious Connecticut home when she read bound
galleys of Journey to Jerusalem. As I was
leaving, she handed the galleys back with a
saddened look: "My dear, have you forgotten
the Holocaust?" She felt that what happened
in Nazi Germany to Jews several decades earlier
should silence any criticism of the Jewish state.
She could focus on a holocaust of Jews while
negating a modern day holocaust of Palestinians.
I realized, quite painfully, that our
friendship was ending. Iphigene Sulzberger had
not only invited me to her home to meet her
famous friends but, also at her suggestion, The
Times had requested articles. I wrote op-ed
articles on various subjects including American
blacks, American Indians as well as undocumented
workers. Since Mrs. Sulzberger and other Jewish
officials at the Times highly praised my efforts
to help these groups of oppressed peoples, the
dichotomy became apparent: most
"liberal" U.S. Jews stand on the side
of all poor and oppressed peoples save one -
the Palestinians.
How handily these liberal Jewish
opinion-molders tend to diminish the
Palestinians, to make them invisible, or to
categorize them all as "terrorists."
Interestingly, Iphigene Sulzberger had talked
to me a great deal about her father, Adolph S.
Ochs. She told me that he was not one of the
early Zionists. He had not favored the creation
of a Jewish state.
Yet, increasingly, American Jews have fallen
victim to Zionism, a nationalistic movement that
passes for many as a religion. While the ethical
instructions of all great religions -
including the teachings of Moses, Muhammad and
Christ - stress that all human beings are
equal, militant Zionists take the position that
the killing of a non-Jew does not count.
Over five decades now, Zionists have killed
Palestinians with impunity. And in the 1996
shelling of a U.N. base in Qana, Lebanon, the
Israelis killed more than 100 civilians sheltered
there. As an Israeli journalist, Arieh Shavit,
explains of the massacre, "We believe with
absolute certitude that right now, with the White
House in our hands, the Senate in our hands and
The New York Times in our hands, the lives of
others do not count the same way as our
own."
Israelis today, explains the anti-Zionist Jew
Israel Shahak, "are not basing their
religion on the ethics of justice. They do not
accept the Old Testament as it is written.
Rather, religious Jews turn to the Talmud. For
them, the Talmudic Jewish laws become "the
Bible." And the Talmud teaches that a Jew
can kill a non-Jew with impunity.
In the teachings of Christ, there was a break
from such Talmudic teachings. He sought to heal
the wounded, to comfort the downtrodden.
The danger, of course, for U.S. Christians is
that having made an icon of Israel, we fall into
a trap of condoning whatever Israel does -
even wanton murder - as orchestrated by
God.
Yet, I am not alone in suggesting that the
churches in the United States represent the last
major organized support for Palestinian rights.
This imperative is due in part to our historic
links to the Land of Christ and in part to the
moral issues involved with having our tax dollars
fund Israeli-government-approved violations of
human rights.
While Israel and its dedicated U.S. Jewish
supporters know they have the president and most
of Congress in their hands, they worry about
grassroots America - the well-meaning
Christians who care for justice. Thus far, most
Christians were unaware of what it was they
didn't know about Israel. They were indoctrinated
by U.S. supporters of Israel in their own country
and when they traveled to the Land of Christ most
all did so under Israeli sponsorship. That being
the case, it was unlikely a Christian ever met a
Palestinian or learned what caused the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
This is gradually changing, however. And this
change disturbs the Israelis. As an example,
delegates attending a Christian Sa beel
conference in Bethlehem earlier this year said
they were harassed by Israeli security at the Tel
Aviv airport.
"They asked us," said one delegate,
"Why did you use a Palestinian travel
agency? Why didn't you use an Israeli
agency?" The interrogation was so extensive
and hostile that Sabeel leaders called a special
session to brief the delegates on how to handle
the harassment. Obviously, said one delegate,
"The Israelis have a policy to discourage us
from visiting the Holy Land except under their
sponsorship. They don't want Christians to start
learning all they have never known about
Israel."
Grace Halsell is a Washington, DC-based writer
and author of Journey to Jerusalem and Prophecy
and Politics
|