Tell Wells Fargo: Stop the Evictions & Wage Theft!Belva Davis is facing eviction from
her They are only two among tens of thousands of victims of corporate crime. The culprit? Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo and its Wachovia subsidiary received $25 Billion in TARP bailout money, not to mention far more subsidy from the Federal Reserve, supposedly to extend credit and keep our economy going during this economic crisis. Instead, these bandits have taken their bailouts and are using that money to block a recovery for the rest of us. This is a corporate crime! ************************************************************** The Henry Louis Gates situation is mainly a distraction. But there's also a serious
policy component. Policemen should not be allowed to
arrest someone for being an asshole in their own home.
If that was the case, right-wing bloggers would all be
doing 10-20. It appears clear, and I guess there may be
audio tape to this effect, that the cop came to Gates'
house, figured out that he was not a burglar, words were
exchanged, and then the cop arrested him for disorderly
conduct. That's really over the line
of what cops should be allowed to do, regardless of the
motivations, racial or otherwise. The crime of
disorderly conduct, beloved by cops who get into
arguments with citizens, requires that the public be
involved. Here's the relevant law from the Massachusetts
Appeals Court, with citations and quotations omitted:
The statute authorizing
prosecutions for disorderly conduct, G.L. c. 272, § 53,
has been saved from constitutional infirmity by
incorporating the definition of "disorderly"
contained in § 250.2(1)(a) and (c) of the Model Penal
Code. The resulting definition of "disorderly"
includes only those individuals who, "with purpose
to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or
recklessly creating a risk thereof ... (a) engage in
fighting or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous
behavior; or ... (c) create a hazardous or physically
offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate
purpose of the actor.' "Public" is defined as
affecting or likely to affect persons in a place to which
the public or a substantial group has access. The lesson most cops understand
(apart from the importance of using the word "tumultuous,"
which features prominently in Crowley's report) is
that a person cannot violate 272/53 by yelling in his own
home. Read Crowley's report and stop
on page two when he admits seeing Gates's Harvard photo
ID. I don't care what Gates had said to him up until then,
Crowley was obligated to leave. He had
identified Gates. Any further investigation of Gates'
right to be present in the house could have been done
elsewhere. His decision to call HUPD seems
disproportionate, but we could give him points for
thoroughness if he had made that call from his car while
keeping an eye on the house. Had a citizen refused to
leave Gates' home after being told to, the cops could
have made an arrest for trespass. But for the sake of education,
let's watch while Crowley makes it worse. Read on. He's
staying put in Gates' home, having been asked to leave,
and Gates is demanding his identification. What
does Crowley do? He suggests that if Gates wants his name
and badge number, he'll
have to come outside to get it. What?
Crowley may be forgiven for the initial approach and
questioning, but surely he should understand that a
citizen will be miffed at being questioned about his
right to be in his own home. Perhaps
Crowley could commit the following sentences to memory:
"I'm sorry for disturbing you," and "I'm
glad you're all right." Spoiling for a fight, Crowley
refuses to repeat his name and badge number.
Most of us would hand over a business card or write the
information on a scrap of paper. No,
Crowley is upset and he's mad at Gates. He's been accused
of racism. Nobody likes
that, but if a cop can't
take an insult without retaliating, he's in the wrong job.
When a person is given a gun and a badge, we better make
sure he's got a firm grasp on his temper. If Crowley had
called Gates a name, I'd be disappointed in him, but
Crowley did something much worse. He set Gates up for a
criminal charge to punish Gates for his own embarrassment. By telling Gates to come outside,
Crowley establishes that he has lost all semblance of
professionalism. It has now become
personal and he wants to create a violation of 272/53. He
gets Gates out onto the porch because a crowd has
gathered providing onlookers who could experience alarm.
Note his careful recitation (tumultuous behavior outside
the residence in view of the public).
And please do not overlook Crowley's
final act of provocation. He tells an
angry citizen to calm down while producing handcuffs. The
only plausible question for the chief to ask about that
little detail is: "Are you stupid, or do you think I'm
stupid?" Crowley produced those
handcuffs to provoke Gates and then arrested him.
The decision to arrest is telling. If Crowley believed
the charge was valid, he could have issued a summons. An
arrest under these circumstances shows his true intent:
to humiliate Gates. The cop baited the guy into
leaving the house so he could arrest him for making a cop
feel bad. I appreciate the work of law
enforcement. But regardless of race, too many cops have
the belief that if they get insulted, they have the right
to turn that into an arresting offense. That's
not the law whatsoever, nor should it be.
It creates a chilling effect among the public not to call
out bad behavior in law enforcement or raise your voice
in any way. I know we're all supposed to
believe that cops are saintly, but I live in LA. Police
misconduct happens all the time, and we should be
vigilant when it does. Instead, the media takes the
soccer ball and chases it into the corner, without any
semblance of factual records or perspective. It becomes
an emotional argument instead of a factual record of
misconduct. We pay cops with tax money.
We should not risk arrest when arguing with them.
Brendan Maslauskas Dunn
asked the City of Olympia for documents or e-mails about
communications between the Olympia police and the
military relating to anarchists, Students for a
Democratic Society (SDS) or the Industrial Workers of the
World (Dunn's union). Dunn received hundreds of documents.
One e-mail contained reference to a "John J. Towery
II," who activists discovered was the same person as
their fellow activist "John Jacob." 'War on terror' reaches US citizens Thu, 30 Jul 2009 Washington has called on Americans to
aid in counterterrorism activities -- a move seen as a
stepping stone to encroach upon civil liberties. Statistical Deceptions By Paul Craig Roberts Last week on NPR a professor in the Sloan School
of Management at MIT explained that what is really at
stake in the health care bill is the US government's
ability to borrow. In other words, the bill is about
cutting health care costs, not about providing hard-pressed
Americans with health care. |