From Idealism
to Brutality, From Liberation to Oppression - How did we
get from there to here?
by
Hanna Braun
Sunday, February 13, 2005
This is an account of a personal Journey to try and help
to explain how so many of us fell for the Zionist myth
and how difficult it was - and still is - to see the
truth beyond it.
When I arrived in Palestine with my parents in 1937, the
Jewish Community in Palestine was minute. The country was
also in the midst of a bitter and violent revolt against
the British Authorities and the new settlers. As soon as
we arrived, my father's relations who had come to Haifa's
port to welcome us, warned us of the dangerous,
treacherous and backward Arabs, who were highly visible
as dockworkers. These aunts and uncles also cautioned us
never to employ Arabs nor to buy anything from them. This
widespread slogan however, termed "Hebrew work for
Hebrew workers", was frequently observed in the
breach of it. My mother's immediate reaction was "is
this how you want to live with them in peace?" This
remark earned her the pity, bordering on contempt, of
most people for not being a true Zionist at all.
At the time this was certainly true: my family on
mother's side were so deeply integrated into German
society that they regarded Zionists as something for poor
East European Jews who couldn't make ends meet.
Eventually she was persuaded to Zionism; albeit to a more
humane and benign version that was very short lived.
As to me, I started school immediately, learned Hebrew
from scratch and was keen to fit in. The nationalistic
songs we learned as well as the collection boxes for the
Fund for Israel and the Settlement Redemption Fund,
didn't impinge much on my consciousness. My Zionist
convictions grew almost imperceptively, mainly after I
started secondary school in Haifa at the age of 13.
Together with socialism, which many of us embraced to a
greater or lesser degree, the vision of an idealised
future of shared rather than owned property and of
building our new land with our hands, if at all possible
as pioneer founders of a new kibbutz (an agricultural
commune), was beguiling.
One of the tenets of the left-wing kibbutz movement at
the time was that it should only hold as much land as its
members could work without hired labour. This ideal is
long gone and so are most kibbutzim, in spite - or
because? - of the prosperity they gained in the years
after WW2, partly by generous reparation money from
Germany and partly from the open theft of large chunks of
land, not in the least arid, from its original Arab
inhabitants. What was never mentioned was that no kibbutz
would accept non-Jewish members.
The lack of Arab members was unsurprising: after their
revolt had been crushed by the British in 1939, I came to
know quite a few Arab families in Haifa, including our
next-door neighbours. Their lifestyle, as well as that of
villagers and Beduins living near to some of the
kibbutzim, whom we occasionally met during the long
summer holidays, was in my view too traditional for them
to wish to become members. We spent practically
every holiday as volunteers on a kibbutz, helping with
various tasks in their fields and orchards. Later on we
also used to go at weekends for firearms training, caches
of which were hidden by practically all kibbutzim. It was
on a kibbutz, though that I experienced the first
puzzling event: two Czech soldiers from the Czechoslovak
Free Army had been sent to recuperate in a kibbutz
comprised exclusively of Czechoslovak immigrants, all of
them completely secular. The two had been bakers in their
respective villages and soon volunteered to work in the
kibbutz bakery, with the result that the standard of
bread, rolls and pastry rocketed to unknown heights. They
took a great liking to kibbutz life and applied to become
members. To this day I remember listening to two
of the female members discussing the matter while we were
working in the orchard; the stumbling block appeared to
be that the two were not Jewish. I couldn't understand
this at all, why was this a problem in a place were there
was no religion whatsoever? Their application was
rejected, as was one I came across years later, when an
English colleague told me that he too had applied for
membership of a kibbutz he had worked on as a volunteer
and had been rejected. By that time it had become clear
that the Land of Israel that we had sung about and
idealised endlessly was meant exclusively for Jews.
Songs played a major role in my life during my school
years and after; some openly defiant: "we shall
never be moved from here" "and despite
everything, the Land of Israel" etc; others more
subtle and beautiful "My homeland is the Land of
Canaan", "My sea of Galilee" and more. Few
of us ever questioned the fact that we were Palestinians
living in Palestine and that there was some contradiction
in asserting that this was, apparently simultaneously,
the Land of Israel. I certainly didn't. Our being sworn
into the Hagana (Defence) underground movement,
incidentally at night in a secret ceremony (something
like a Klu Klux Klan ceremony) in a remote sheltered
grove on Mount Carmel, equally did not alert me: we were
going to rid ourselves of the British Colonial Powers.
Most of us were totally blind to the hidden agenda and
danger we presented to the local population, although
they were only too aware of it.
During the war years there was growing anxiety amounting
to dread among European Jews about the fate of families
left behind, and growing bitterness about Britain in
particular doing so little to try and rescue them.
However, this was also a period of greater mutual
tolerance between Arabs and Jews.
At the end of WW2 tensions between Jewish settlers and
the British authorities increased; there was growing
pressure to let in ships packed with refugees from the
death camps in Europe. It was revealed only recently that
many of these survivors didn't want to go to Palestine
but were herded, often by force, onto ships by Hagana
commanders. David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Yishuv (the
Jewish community in Palestine) asserted and later
reiterated that had there been a choice of saving one
million Jewish children by sending them to the UK prior
to the war or only half that number by sending them to
Palestine, he would always have opted for the latter.
Equally, there were more and more vociferous demands for
our own state in Palestine. When this was finally granted
by the UN in 1947, there were wild jubilations among the
Jewish population but anger and dismay among the Arab
one: the proposed two states gave Jews over half the land
although they were only about 1/6th of the population and
at the time owned just under 10% of the land of
Palestine. Even before the British left in May 1948,
expulsions of Arab villagers had started and their
villages were often razed to the ground.
By the end of the "Independence" War the
terrible Palestinian Nakba had occurred and over 700,000
Palestinian Arabs had become refugees, never to be
allowed to return to their homes. A great deal more than
the proposed land had been expropriated by the Israeli
Defence Army. This process of ethnic cleansing continues
till today and the term "Defence Army" is
laughable as it is so clearly an Army of Occupation.
Several incidents which had started to worry me had
occurred by then: the massacre in April 1948 of the
inhabitants of Deir Yassin, an entirely peaceful village
near Jerusalem. In the summer of that year on a brief
visit to Haifa during the first armistice, I was shocked
to learn about the expulsion of most of the City's Arab
population including our neighbours. This had also
happened in Safad and in many other places. Even so, for
many years I, along with a majority of Israelis, remained
far too gullible and believed the relentless propaganda
we were fed, which asserted that the bulk of the local
population fled in spite of assurances that nothing would
happen to them. It was easier to believe that Deir
Yassin, Haifa and Safad were exceptions. Lenin had coined
a term for blindly loyal followers of soviet ideology:
"useful idiots"; a most fitting description of
us.
However, during the early 50's I became aware firstly of
the shabby treatment of non European immigrants, many of
them Arab Jews, upon arrival in the new state. Even more
appalling was the way in which the remaining Arab
citizens were treated. They became the target of
institutional racism, regarded as non-equal to Jewish
Israelis just by not being Jews. This blatant inequality
exists until this day; Israeli citizens are classified
from birth as Jew, Arab or Druze, with only the first
group enjoying the full rights and benefits of Jewish
Nationals. More over, Israeli Arabs cannot buy property
or land in Israel and much of their land and many
villages are still being expropriated. The intention of
the state is clear: as few Arabs as possible on as little
land as possible.
What is happening now with the continued occupation of
and expansion in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is a
natural extension of the conviction that all of Israel,
from the Mediterranean to the Jordan river belongs solely
to Jews. Some of the proponents of this belief have a
religious perspective, other a chauvinist/colonialist
one. Since the year 2000 alone, 30,000 houses and 80,000
olive trees have been demolished and thousands of acres
of land have been confiscated by settlement expansion.
This expansion and the enforced separation, i.e.
apartheid, can only be achieved by brute force, and
indeed the Israeli army/police have brutalised
Palestinians in a shocking manner which would not be
tolerated had any other state acted in this way. However,
those who brutalise others, inevitably brutalise
themselves, as was the case in South Africa, Rwanda and
Germany during the third Reich.
It has become acceptable to shoot young children, to
humiliate people at the endless checkpoints surrounding
all Palestinian towns and villages. The demolition of
whole rows of houses as "collective punishment"
or as "collateral damage" is widespread.
Israeli soldiers wilfully occupy the roofs of houses in
Palestinian towns and villages, then proceed to
intimidate the owners so as to make them leave by
urinating into water tanks, throwing their rubbish onto
lower balconies, writing obscene graffiti on walls and
smashing computers, furniture and glass. I saw some of
such graffiti in the old city of Jerusalem as well as in
Hebron and other places. They had a Star of David with
inscriptions "Arabs out" and "death to
Arabs", eerily reminiscent of what I saw as a child
in Berlin with the Star of David replaced by a swastika
and Jews replaced by Arabs.
Israel still cynically claims to be the
"victim"; while it is the second largest arms
manufacturer in the world and has the fifth biggest
stockpile of nuclear weapons worldwide. The vast majority
of Israelis live in a state of perpetual fear and hatred
of Arabs and have hijacked the holocaust in an almost
obscene manner in order to justify their own atrocities.
By imprisoning the "other" they imprison
themselves, most glaringly with the monstrous
"Security Wall" now growing apace. This wall
eats deeply into Palestinian land so that many farmers
can no longer tend their field and olive groves and
children, the sick and elderly face enormous obstacles in
their daily lives. This is not about security; it is
naked apartheid.
Israel is in a deep moral quagmire and to me only one
solution is possible and just: to put Human and Civil
Rights above Israeli/Jewish Rights. It is only by ridding
ourselves from the narrow and blinkered view which puts
us and our needs above all others that we can normality,
morality and a sense of justice. To liberate ourselves
and live in true freedom and peace we must adopt the idea
of one democratic secular state for all its citizens,
whoever they are.
Forwarded by Peter Myers
|