Member, Axis Of
Good
Dov
ZakheimA Key 9/11 Conspirator?
Most people familiar with the 9/11 cover-up have a fair
idea of some of the key players in the monumental 9/11
crime. Rabbi Dov Zakheim, one of the central figures in
this vile operation, isnt as well known because
hes one who has always lurked in the shadows.
Zakheim is as powerful as he is inconspicuous, and a man
of many talents:
- Graduate
of the prestigious London School of Economics
(PhD), and the University of Oxford (National
Science Foundation Graduate Fellow)
- Former
CEO of Systems Planning Corporation, a highly
specialized defense technology company that
manufactures a one-of-a-kind remote-piloting
system for aircraft, including commercial
airliners (see below)
- Senior
Fellow for Asian Studies of the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR)
- Member
of the Task Force on Defense Reform (appointed by
Secretary of Defense Cohen)
- Senior
Advisor at the Center for International and
Strategic Studies
- Former
Under Secretary of Defense (appointed by George
W. Bush)
- Comptroller
of the Pentagon {see [1] below
for performance report}
- Pioneer
and prime architect of Project for the
New American Century (PNAC), the
neo-con cabal that authored Rearming
Americas Defenses (RAD), the
bible for American global domination [2]
- Author
of Flight Of The Lavi: Inside A
US-Israeli Crisis (Brasseys,
1996)
- Long-time
Bush associate, having served as a policy advisor
to the governor during the 2000 campaign
- Columnist
for The Jerusalem Post
- Editorial
Board member of Israel Affairs
- Ordained
Rabbi
- Citizen
of the State of Israel [How a citizen of
Israel can serve as Comptroller of Americas
central defense establishment is a question I
shall leave to others for comment. While they
ponder this perturbing oddity, perhaps they could
also shed light on why every one of the following
kingpins of the Bush administration are also
Israeli citizens: Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle,
Douglas Feith, Michael Chertoff, George Tenet,
Elliot Abrams, Donald Kagan, Richard Haas,
Kenneth Adelman, Edward Luttwak, Robert Satloff,
David Frum, David Wurmser, Steve Goldsmith, and
Marc Grossman.]
[1] I
know Dr. Zakheim has been trying to hire CPAs because the
financial systems of the department are so snarled up
that we can't account for some $2.6 TRILLION
in transactions that exist...
Secretary of
Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, during testimony before the
House Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Year 2002 Defense
Budget Request, as given by Secy. Rumsfeld, Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton, and
Comptroller Dov Zakheim; on Monday, July 16, 2001.
[NB: Dr. Zakheim resigned as Pentagon Comptroller and
Chief Financial Officer at the beginning of March when it
was revealed that the he is unable to account for the
disappearance of $2.6 trillion (its unlikely this
will receive much coverage in the mainstream media).
Zakheim has since taken a lucrative position as a vice
president of the mega-consultancy Booz, Allen, &
Hamilton (one that also works closely with DARPA). Rabbi
Zakheim is also Chief Executive Officer of SPC
International Corporation (a subsidiary of the
aforementioned remote-flight-control-technology firm), a
company that specializes in political, military,
and economic consulting, and international sales and
analysis. In addition, Dr. Zakheim serves as
Consultant to the Secretary of Defense and the Under
Secretary of Defense for Policy. As the Rabbis
record clearly shows, he has serious tenure in the US
defense establishment: more than 30 years of holding
assorted senior positions at the Pentagon.]
[2] Dov
Zakheim is the co-author of that singularly
sinisterand chillingly ominousstatement
contained in Rearming Americas Defenses (RAD) re
the plan for American global domination [through
galvanizing American emotional support for full-scale war
against oil-rich Arab states]: "...the
process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent
some catastrophic and catalyzing eventlike a new
Pearl Harbor". The PNAC
document also expressly recommends the US should seize
Iraq even if Saddam Hussein were deposed through a
military coup. [So much for bringing freedom
and democracy to the people of that country.]
The
good Rabbis involvement with PNAC, his previous
directorship of a corporation that manufactures remote
control flight systems, and his inability to document how
the Pentagon has spent TRILLIONS of American
taxpayers dollars suggests that real investigations
into the crimes of 9/11 and the US invasion of
Afghanistan and Iraq would put Mr. Zakheim near the top
of the witness list for interrogation and potential
prosecution.
SYSTEMS
PLANNING CORPORATION
Dr. Dov Zakheim was the former CEO of Systems Planning
Corporation, a company that designs and manufactures
extremely sophisticated control/guidance technology that
enables an external operator to fly, and land, aircraft
by remote control. One of the companys principal
products is the Command Transmitter System (CTS), a fully
self-contained, solid-state platform capable of providing
totally programmable remote flight control capability,
including high-precision electronic navigation.
The companys parallel product, the Flight
Termination System (FTS), enables system-equipped
aircraft to be safely landed on any suitable runway in
the worldregardless of the availability of
ground-based navigational or landing aids (VOR, ILS, MLS,
etc.).
Such total independence in all flight regimes is achieved
through a variety of ultra-sophisticated space-based
technologies, including Mil-spec DGPS (Differential GPS,
using extremely precise encrypted military P
Code transmissions), and is accurate to within one
foot of the runway centerline during landing.
The CTS/FTS remote-control system is capable of
controlling up to 8 airborne vehiclesincluding
airlinerssimultaneously from ground-based or
airborne (AWACS) positions.
[Coincidence: Operation Vigilant
Guardian, one of five NORAD war game
exercises underway on the morning of 9/11 and
orchestrated by Dick Cheney, involved the simulated
hijacking of commercial airliners. At one
point during the exercises, while the four
real hijacked aircraft were airborne, as many
as TWENTY-TWO independent radar blips representing
hijacked aircraft were simultaneously
displayed on FAA radar screens along the Eastern
seaboard. This, obviously, created total pandemonium. Air
traffic controllers who had been advised beforehand by
NORAD of the simulated hijackings, began
frantically calling NORAD to determine which of the
twenty-two targets were real and which were
exercise. All indications are that whatever
it was that happened to the four real
hijacked airliners occurred during this
purposefully orchestrated melee while the order was given
for the US Air Force to stand down.]
The CTS/FTS system (subsequently improved, tested and
implemented by Raytheon) allows specialist ground
controllers to listen-in on cockpit conversations on the
target aircraft, then take absolute control of its
computerized flight control system by remote means and
safely land the aircraft at any airport within range.
In other words, this technology was designed to empower
law enforcement agencies to hijack hijackers.
[NB: The ground station technology for CTS/FTS was
developed by Raytheon under an Air Force contract for the
Joint Precision Approach and Landings System (JPALS)
program. A government-industry team accomplished the
first precision approach/auto-land by a civil aircraft
using this system on August 25, 2001 at Holloman AFB, NM.
A FedEx Express 727-200 aircraft demonstrated hundred
percent system proficiency by executing six full
auto-lands using the JPALS ground station.]
HOME
RUN
In partnership with Raytheon, System Planning Corporation
also supplies CTS/FTS technology to commercial airplane
manufacturers for installation in airliners (Boeing:
confirmed; Airbus: undetermined, but highly probable
given the consortiums connection to BAE, a US
military contractor.)
It has been reported that DARPAs codename for the
CTS/FTS system was Home Run. Former German
Secretary of Defense Andreas Von Buelow may have alluded
to foreknowledge of Home Run technology in an interview
he gave the German daily "Tagesspiegel" on
January 13th, 2002:
"There is also the
theory of one British flight engineer: according to this,
the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the
pilots' hands, from outside. The Americans had developed
a method in the 1970s, whereby they could rescue hijacked
planes by intervening into the computer piloting
[automatic pilot system]. This theory says this technique
was abused in this case [9/11]..."
Upon deeper scrutiny this may not appear quite so much a
theory as might first seem. Its been
reported that the German national carrier Lufthansa,
seriously concerned that one of its own aircraft might be
rescued by the Americans without its
authority, had every one of its Home Run-equipped Boeing
aircraft stripped of the American flight control
computers. Its reasonable to presume that Herr Von
Buelowthe Secretary of Defense and Minister of
Science and Technology at the timewould have known
all about this mammoth but secretive task (how very
cleverand discreetof Von Buelow to
"drop the information into the middle of an
interview about the 9/11 attacks). Lufthansa aircraft
(and possibly others) are now effectively impervious to
Home Run take-overs, but that is more than can be said
for the American aircraft fleet.
In order to make Home Run truly effective, it had to be
completely integrated with all onboard systems, and this
could only be accomplished with a new aircraft design,
several of which were on the drawing boards at that time.
Under cover of extreme secrecy, the multinationals and
DARPA went ahead on this basis and built back
doors into the new computerized flight control
systems.
There were two very obvious hard requirements at this
stage: 1) a primary control channel for use in taking
over the flight control system and flying the aircraft
back to an airfield of choice, and 2) a covert audio
channel for monitoring flight deck conversations. Once
the primary channel was activated, all aircraft functions
came under direct ground (or AWACS) control, permanently
removing the hijackers and pilots from the control loop.
It needs mention that this was not a system designed to
undermine the authority of the flight crews,
but rather, implemented as a doomsday device
in the event the hijackers began to shoot passengers or
crew members, possibly including the pilots. Based on the
reasonable assumption that hijackers only carry a limited
number of rounds of ammunition, and many modern airliners
carry in excess of 300 passengers, Home Run was envisaged
as a system that could be used to fly all the survivors
to a friendly airport for a safe landing.
System
Activation
Activating the primary Home Run channel is reportedly
fairly straightforward. A transponder, as many readers
know, is a combined radio transmitter and receiver which
operates automaticallyin the case of 9/11, relaying
data between the four aircraft and air traffic
controllers on the ground. The transmitted signals
represent a unique identity for each
aircraft, essential in crowded airspace to avoid midair
collisionsand equally essential for Home Run
controllers trying to lock onto the correct aircraft.
Once the correct target aircraft is located by radar, the
Home Run duplex data bus piggy backs the
transponder channel and assumes direct control from the
ground. This could explain
why NONE of the four aircraft sent the special I
have been hijacked transponder code (7500), despite
multiple activation points for this
distress transmission on all four aircraftand
despite being flown by combat-hardened ex-fighter pilots.
Because the transponder frequency had already been
piggy-backed by Home Run, transmission of the special
hijack code was rendered impossible. This was the first
hard proof that the target aircraft had been hijacked
electronically from the ground, rather than by Arab
patsies toting box-cutters.
The Home Run listening device on the flight deck utilizes
the cockpit microphones that normally feed the Cockpit
Voice Recorder (CVR), one of two black boxes armored to
withstand heavy impact and thereby later provide
investigators significant clues to why the aircraft
crashed. However, once plugged into Home Run, the CVRs
are bypassed, and voice transmissions are no longer
recorded on the 30minute continuous-loop recording tape.
If Home Run is active for more than thirty minutes, there
will therefore be no audible data on the Cockpit Voice
Recorders. Crash investigators are said to have recovered
the CVRs from the Pentagon and Pittsburg aircraft, and
publicly confirmed that both are completely blank. The
only possible reason for this is data capture by Home
Run, providing the final hard proof that the attack
aircraft were hijacked electronically from the ground,
rather than by Arab terrorists.
Discussion
It is not being suggested that remote circumvention and
take-over of the four airliners controls is
definitely what happened on 9/11. But if this scenario
seems improbable, one must necessarily consider the
probability of four airliners being taken over
simultaneously, casually flown around a large swath of
the country for almost two hours under the vigilant eye
of NORAD, and then used as missilesall without a
single fighter being scrambled to intercept any of them.
Since this is what actually happened, we have no choice
but to consider other implausible scenarios.
And since the official scenario is itself an
unsubstantiatedand truly
farfetched"conspiracy theory," other
competing scenarios should also receive serious
attention.
The publics reluctance to question official
doctrine on this matter is a symptom of the societal role
for which most of us have been bred and trained: to be
ever-faithful hounds, tails thumping the floor as we
contentedly slurp the hand of class authority. Such
credulity also becomes inevitable when the alternative is
so unbearable: if someone in Bush's position is capable
of lying to us about something as huge, as
gut-wrenchingly horrible as 9/11, then everything we
believe about this countryabout the nature of
civilization itselfmight just be childish nonsense.
Most people simply don't have the guts to go there. Given
a desperate enough need to sustain the childish belief in
government-as-benevolent-father, a person will adapt that
belief to any circumstance. The behavioral end result can
resemble courage; indeed, we are taught to regard it as
the DEFINITION of courage. Actually, it's one of
cowardice's darkest moments. Even a casual examination of
Nazi Germany, where this phenomenon was
rampant, will drive this point home.
It's almost funny, the way people readily see the threat
of technological circumvention presented by Diebold's
electronic voting machines, yet when the subject switches
to Systems Planning Corporations Flight Termination
System, which is every bit as real, and to the exactly
parallel possibilities it represents vis-a-vis 9/11, they
suddenly retreat into profound and combative denial. It's
as if a threshold has been crossed into a realm of
possibilities too vile to entertain, so they simply
don't. Never mind that this country's operatives have
been traveling the world, perpetrating similar horrors,
for all of the past century.
Rather than acknowledge the possibility of a unifying
pattern, Joe Sixpack would much rather 'shoot the
messenger.' Every so often, such people establish a new
high-water mark for cowardice and facultative stupidity,
and the present is definitely one of those times. After
all, the official 9/11 scenario they cling to with such
desperate faith comes from only one source: the Western
"intelligence community"the most brazen,
systematic, resourceful, and interlocked association of
habitual liars this world has ever seen.
As should have been made clear by any number of
intelligence scandals over the years, the credibility of
this bunch goes past zero into the negative: pending
airtight proof, anything they say should be reflexively
deemed a lie. You may remember that the FBI also provided
the identities of "the 19 hijackers" within
hoursinformation that soon also became quite
suspect, especially considering there was NOT ONE Arab
name on any of the flight manifests (miraculously, they
even found paper passports that had survived fireballs,
Arabic flight manuals conveniently left in the trunks of
cars, etc., etc.)
At least seven of the hijackers are still alive in the
Middle Easta pretty good alibi, wouldnt you
say? Several of these ex-suspects had their passports or
other IDs stolen from them over the years, and it's
entirely possible that all 19 hijackers had stolen
identities, meaning they could have come from
anywhereor been absent altogether. Our media were
pretty slack about acknowledging this at the time, and
since then have dropped this ball entirely. Whats
really amazing is that not one mainstream journalist has
asked how these 19 alleged hijackers boarded their
aircraft when their names were not on any of the
passenger manifests.
Rather than allow the "intelligence community"
to render every detail of our comprehension on this
matter, we would be much wiser to carefully identify and
discard every assumption they hand us.
Planes of 911 Exceeded Their Software
Limits
by Jim Heikkila
http://www.viewzone.com/911revisited.html
Two of the aircraft exceeded their software limits on
9/11.
The Boeing 757 and 767 are equipped with fully autonomous
flight capability, they are the only two Boeing commuter
aircraft capable of fully autonomous flight. They can be
programmed to take off, fly to a destination and land,
completely without a pilot at the controls.
They are intelligent planes, and have software limits pre
set so that pilot error cannot cause passenger injury.
Though they are physically capable of high g maneuvers,
the software in their flight control systems prevents
high g maneuvers from being performed via the cockpit
controls. They are limited to approximately 1.5 g's, I
repeat, one and one half g's. This is so that a pilot
mistake cannot end up breaking grandma's neck.
No matter what the pilot wants, he cannot override this
feature.
The plane that hit the Pentagon approached or reached its
actual physical limits, military personnel have
calculated that the Pentagon plane pulled between five
and seven g's in its final turn.
The same is true for the second aircraft to impact the
WTC.
There is only one way this can happen.
As well as fully autonomous flight capability, the 767
and 757 are the ONLY COMMUTER PLANES MADE BY BOEING THAT
CAN BE FLOWN VIA REMOTE CONTROL. It is a feature that is
standard to all of them, all 757's and 767's can do it.
The purpose for this is if there is a problem with the
pilots, Norad can fly the planes to safe destinations via
remote. Only in this flight mode can those craft exceed
their software limits and perform to their actual
physical limits because a pre existing emergency
situation is assumed if this mode of flight is used.
[Google "Raytheon Global Hawk system"]
Terrorists in fact did not fly those planes, it is
totally and completely impossible for those planes to
have been flown in such a manner from the cockpit. Those
are commuter aircraft, not F-16's and their software
knows it.
Another piece of critical evidence: the voice recorders
came up blank.
The flight recorders that were recovered had tape that
was undamaged inside, but it was blank. There is only one
way this can happen on a 757 or 767. When the aircraft
are commandeered via remote control, the microphones that
go to the cockpit voice recorder are re routed to the
people doing the remote controlling, so that the
recording of what happened in the cockpit gets made in a
presumably safer place. But due to a glitch in the system
on a 757/767, rather than shutting off when the mic is
redirected the voice recorder keeps running. The voice
recorders use what is called a continuous loop tape,
which automatically re passes itself past the erase and
record heads once every half hour, so after a half hour
of running with the microphones redirected, the tape will
be blank. Just like the recovered tapes were. Yet more
proof that no pilot flew those planes in the last half
hour.
Eight of the hijackers who were on those planes called up
complaining that they were still alive. I'd bet you never
heard about our foreign minister flying to Morocco and
issuing an official apology to the accused, did you? No,
terrorists did not fly those planes, plastic knives and
box cutters were in fact too ridiculous to be true. Any
of the remaining accused have certainly been sought out
and killed by now.
Our information IS controlled
The cell phone calls from the aircraft could not have
happened. I am a National Security Agency trained
Electronic Warfare specialist, and am qualified to say
this. My official title: MOS33Q10, Electronic Warfare
Intercept Strategic Signal Processing/Storage Systems
Specialist, a highly skilled MOS which requires advanced
knowledge of many communications methods and circuits to
the most minute level. I am officially qualified to place
severe doubt that ordinary cell phone calls
were ever made from the aircraft.
It was impossible for that to have happened, especially
in a rural area for a number of reasons.
When you make a cell phone call, the first thing that
happens is that your cell phone needs to contact a
transponder. Your cell phone has a max transmit power of
five watts, three watts is actually the norm. If an
aircraft is going five hundred miles an hour, your cell
phone will not be able to 1. Contact a tower, 2. Tell the
tower who you are, and who your provider is, 3. Tell the
tower what mode it wants to communicate with, and 4.
Establish that it is in a roaming area before it passes
out of a five watt range. This procedure, called an
electronic handshake, takes approximately 45 seconds for
a cell phone to complete upon initial power up in a
roaming area because neither the cell phone or cell
transponder knows where that phone is and what mode it
uses when it is turned on. At 500 miles an hour, the
aircraft will travel three times the range of a
cell phone's five watt transmitter before this
handshaking can occur. Though it is sometimes possible to
connect during takeoff and landing, under the situation
that was claimed the calls were impossible. The calls
from the airplane were faked, no if's or buts.
I hope I made sense, if you have questions I will respond
if possible. If I do not respond, please research this
out yourself, search the Boeing site, search the DARPA
site, search where you have not searched before. Some of
the information is classified and leaked by individuals,
and it is also being scoured from the net. I have all of
the original documents on my computer to safeguard
against this.
Please do not ignore this, because only Norad has the
flight codes for those aircraft, we did 911 to ourselves.
Hitler had the Reichstag, we have 911. If 911 proves to
not be enough to make the US citizenry set aside its
rights for safety, the people who did 911 most certainly
have access to nuclear material. 911 must be exposed for
what it was before that material is used.
OLMERT, ATZMON, ABRAHAM AND 9/11
by Barry Chamish
In 1989 the Likud Party was
investigated by the state comptroller for
massive fraud. The two chief
accountants of the party were Menachem
Atzmon and Ehud Olmert. Somehow, Atzmon
was convicted of fraud and
Olmert wasn't.
In 2006 Olmert was elected in his way
to be prime minister of Israel and
Atzmon was forgotten.
Well, not by everyone. The enemies of
Israel's government remembered him
and his once-close ties to Olmert. I
was a guest on a Republic
Broadcasting Network's program with a
true anti-Israel bigot,
Christopher Bollyn. I knew him and had
not admired him in the case of
the murder of Utah Congressman Wayne
Owens. He had changed the
background of the story, making Yasir
Arafat the victim of Israeli
chicanery. But we'll get there soon
enough.
He was repeating his process, turning
Israel's attack on Gaza as
unrelated to Hamas' murder and I was
defending Israel, when he caught me
offguard. "Do you know Menachem
Atzmon?" he asked. I answered, "He was
Likud Treasurer along with Olmert in
the late 80s," I answered. Then he
playfully announced, "Did you know
he was personally responsible for
security at Logan and Newark Airports
on 9/11?"
That I DIDN'T know. Here is Bollyn's
report:
/OLMERT AND ATZMON /
/Olmert, who has long been tarnished by
allegations of financial crimes,
was implicated in a financial scandal
involving forged receipts for
donations to the 1988 Likud campaign,
of which he was co-treasurer. This
affair culminated in the March 1996
conviction of three other Likudniks,
including Menahem Atzmon, the Likud
treasurer. Olmert was also later
indicted in the Likud affair, but was
acquitted. /
/During the 1970s Olmert had worked in
the law firm owned by another
Atzmon, Uzi Atzmon. /
/Menahem Atzmon, convicted in Israel,
went on to become the founder and
head of International Consultants on
Targeted Security (ICTS), the
parent company of Huntleigh USA, the
airport security firm that ran
passenger screening operations at the
airports of Boston and Newark on
9/11. /
/Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned
subsidiary of an Israeli company called
International Consultants on Targeted
Security (ICTS) International
N.V., a Netherlands-based aviation and
transportation security firm
headed by former [Israeli]
military commanding officers and veterans of
government intelligence and security
agencies. /
/Menachem Atzmon, convicted in Israel
in 1996 for campaign finance
fraud, and his business partner Ezra
Harel, took over management of
security at the Boston and Newark
airports when their company ICTS
bought Huntleigh USA in 1999. UAL
Flight 175 and AA 11, which allegedly
struck the twin towers, both originated
in Boston, while UAL 93, which
purportedly crashed in Pennsylvania,
departed from the Newark airport.
The convicted Israeli criminal Atzmon
also controls and operates the
German port of Rostock on the Baltic
Sea. /
/Some 9/11 victims families
brought lawsuits against Huntleigh claiming
the security firm had been grossly
negligent on 9-11. While these
relatives have a right to discovery and
to know what Huntleigh did or
did not do to protect their loved ones
on 9-11, Huntleigh, along with
the other security companies, was
granted complete congressional
protection in 2002 and will not be
called to account for its actions on
9-11 in any U.S. court. /
/Atzmon, a convicted criminal,
political ally and co-defendant of
Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, was
directly responsible for
passenger and airline security at
Boston's Logan Airport, whence the two
airliners which struck the World Trade
Center originated.
/
/ /It was directly lifted from an
earlier report by Anton Chaiken:/
/
/Menachem Atzmon resigned as president
of Friedman's IDF following his
1996 conviction for Israeli election
campaign finance fraud. But his
later U.S. activities would prove to be
much more disturbing.
Atzmon and his business partner Ezra
Harel are the majority owners (57%)
of ICTSInternational Consultants
on Targeted Security, run by "former
[Israeli] military commanding officers
and veterans of government
intelligence and security
agencies" according its Web site. In 1999,
Atzmon's Netherlands-based firm took
over management of security at
Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts,
through ICTS' subsidiary
Huntleigh USA.
This convicted Likud criminal's firm
was in charge of security at Logan
Airportinspecting the validity of
passports and visas, searching cargo,
screening passengerswhen two
airliners were hijacked from there on
Sept. 11, 2001, and demolished the
World Trade Center towers in New York.
/And now the long forgotten scandal of
the elections. Olmert was boosted
into power by Daniel Abraham, the
Daniel Abraham of the Peres Peace
Center and partner of the now deceased
Wayne Wayne Owens. It was Abraham
who purchased Olmert's Jerusalem
apartment for twice its value and gave
Olmert an extra couple of million bucks
to run for PM.
Someone thought that trying to knock me
out permanently would do the
trick for the crooks running Israel.
We'll see. On July 15, I will be
given a full 3 hours in Salt Lake City
to, first expose Rabin and then
the murder of local Congressman Wayne
Owens. Recall the Ginossar Scandal
and the $300 million Ginossar buried
for Arafat in a Swiss bank account.
Recall that numerous straw companies
were set up to hide the money's
source, and who was named their CEO?
None other than Stephen Cohen,
Owens own partner in peace along with
Peres, Abraham and the gang of
murderers for peace.
An Important Note from Prof. Steven
Jones
As most (if
not all) of you already know, Prof. Steven Jones is
the BYU physicist who was the first academic to
prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Twin Towers
were brought down with explosives. Prof. Jones,
whos co-chair (along with Prof. James Fetzer)
of Scholars For 9/11 Truth, copied for me on the
following recent email; it is self-explanatory ...
Though it's very late, I'd like to share a few
thoughts before I retire.
1. Evidently there are some who go to
considerable lenghts to promote the notion that
there can never be "proof" of an inside
job on 9/11 -- whether that happened or not as an inside
job. So, we might as well abandon the effort,
and let it go.
Others (I have read) have pointed out this argument
was used effectively to stymie further
investigation of the JFK assassination. I wonder how many
"9/11 truthers" are buying into such a
discouraging philosophy?
2. Some OTOH raise the "preponderance of
evidence" argument -- that will stand in a
court of law or impeachment, if we can ever get to such a
trial. This approach may work, given enough
time and the opportunity for a trial in an
objective court.
3. As a third altermative, I'm seeking
solid evidences that approach scientific proof. And
I see three possible avenues here:
A. The use of
thermite in arson has been proven beyond reasonable
doubt in many cases already: Fire investigators
have developed techniques to pin down the use of
thermite, as I discussed in my LA talk. The
signature residues of thermite are so distinctive --
when
one uses EDS, XRF and other methods -- that it is indeed
possible to prove arson by thermite.
This gives me hope that this approach can be
effectively used to prove thermite use on 9/11.
(And I deeply appreciate your help in this
research effort!)
Note also that while I'm leaning now to the use of
thermite-containing sol-gels, it is possible that
cylinders containing thermite as you have found patents
for could have [also] been used. Finding such
a cylinder would indeed be a dramatic proof in
itself, I believe.
B. Showing that the Towers and/or WTC 7 would
not have collapsed so rapidly or in the way
they did, if fires alone had initiated
collapse.
Here the published works of Prof. Kuttler and
Gordon Ross (and others) are hopeful -- in that
their line of reasoning and calculations could very
well lead to a conclusion that deliberate actions
would have been required to bring the buildings
down in the WAY THEY WERE OBSERVED TO COLLAPSE.
C. Confession by an insider, particularly a
high-up insider with detailed insider information
which could be checked, would end the debate also.
D. Another 9/11-type
"catalyzing event" may be staged by
perpetrators, and with the number of people aware
of the likelihood of such staged events and WATCHING, it
is likely that the data will be gathered quickly
and not effectively destroyed this next time.
(I'm remembering here the way the steel was
shipped to Asia for recycling from the 9/11 events, for
example) . In this way, the perps would be stopped
-- by observant citizens working together.
So no, I do not accept the
defeatist arguments that the debate over 9/11 will
never end. Indeed, I am inclined to believe,
because of the progress lately in the areas
delineated above -- that the end of the debate will
come rather soon. I believe this will happen
before the 2008 elections, if we keep pressing
forward as we have in recent
months, in the "9/11 Truth Movement."
My desire here is to encourage you to keep up the
investigative and highly supportive work that you
have done, for which I offer my deepest
appreciation.
Best wishes and regards,
Steven E. Jones
6 July 2006
IF THE
FBI CAN DO IT - WHO ELSE CAN DO IT??
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/432918p-364663c.html
New York Daily News
- http://www.nydailynews.com Terror crew urged to hit FBI's bldgs.
BY JONATHAN LEMIRE
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Thursday, July 6th, 2006
An FBI informant urged seven terror suspects to target
FBI offices throughout the country - including one in New
York - and even helped the men scout the buildings, law
enforcement sources told the Daily News yesterday.
The suspects, who also
allegedly schemed to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago,
were denied bond in a Miami federal court yesterday as
sources shed light on the FBI effort to ensnare them.
Last December, the FBI
arranged for an undercover informant posing as an Al
Qaeda terrorist to meet with alleged ringleader Narseal
Batiste, who authorities say had already recruited six
men to help bring down the landmark 110-story Chicago
office tower.
But in March, in an effort
to solidify his "terrorist credentials," the
informant suggested the men widen their aims to attack
FBI offices in Miami, Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington
and New York, a law enforcement source said.
Batiste and his followers
readily agreed, even taking an Al Qaeda oath at the
suggestion of the informant, Justice Department sources
said. Soon, Batiste and the agent began a surveillance
operation of the FBI office in Miami - while the bureau
watched their every move, sources said.
"The FBI made sure
the informant suggested Bureau buildings and not, say,
airports, in order to maintain an element of
control," said a law enforcement source. "The
FBI knew exactly what was going on and was in complete
control."
The terror suspects never
performed reconnaissance on the Sears Tower or any other
FBI office, including the one in lower Manhattan that was
also targeted in a 1993 plot to blow up New York
landmarks. They also never acquired any of the explosives
to carry out their attacks, authorities said.
Zionists and 9/11 "BY WAY OF
DECEPTION THOU SHALT DO
WAR"
by Harmon L. Taylor
10 July A.D. 2006
Not to deny or abrogate any of the facts stated here, but
simply to supplement them, all great "plans"
have a "fall guy." Yes, there's a central
motive force behind all of this. But to know that Israel,
as the Anglo-Saxon people, is to know that they are their
own worst enemies. And, they very well know how to keep
the focus off the actual brains behind the operations.
One of the clearest connections with the jews is the fact
that maybe one jew was killed in the 9-11 massacres.
Maybe one. They "got the word" and were simply
not in the WTC Towers that morning.
But, at the very same time, the French "got the
word," for they had a film crew within a mile of the
Towers and ever-so-conveniently had a perfect view of
that first plane's going into that first Tower, and they
ever-so-conveniently had the perfect equipment to do an
instant zoom from street level 20-30 feet to Tower level,
roughly a mile away, and they never lost focus during the
zoom.
Who knows how the French gather their intelligence, and
they may be just as likely to get word from Middle East
based operations as operations based in London. But,
where our news media refuse to cover the stories where
the French and American agents spoil a British-agent plot
to plant
explosives in a railroad in New York, as I barely recall
the exact target, I'm much more inclined to think that
the operations are planned "locally" rather
than out of the Middle East.
Yes, jews are involved. But, so were "middle
easterners" involved in the OKC Bombing, and that
one was specifically designed and carried out by the
Bush-Klinton cartel, in order to destroy (1) the Mena,
Arkansas, drug trafficking investigation records stored
in the Murrah Building, as well as (2) the Iran/Contra
investigation records stored in the Murrah Building.
There need be only sufficient facts to give the false
trail, and then the coverage to justify looking down that
false trail. The jews are very capable when it comes to
taking care of their own. We are always reminded of the
raid on Entebbe. But, how in the world do they pull off
the 9-11 massacre over American air space? They don't.
"We" did it, and not for anything having to do
with the "middle east," but rather (1) to
reopen the opium trade in Afghanistan (because that's the
"money" of the "new world order") and
(2) other reasons we may not recognize for years to come,
i.e., the international shift in the oil usage/trade,
given all the construction/development in China. For
example, a shift toward Euros and away from
"dollars" have very, very little to do with
"Israel."
Many buy into the "magician's distraction" of
terrorists and Osama bin Laden and Hussein. Those who
look beyond that veil may buy into the "magician's
distraction" of "the jews." If one
is predisposed to find a problem with this or that group,
then one will find a problem, whether it's there or not.
And, what I'm suggesting is that while one can "make
a case" for what's asserted here, it's also the
reality that Jayna Davis, as just one of many, "made
a case" for Iraqi involvement in the
OKC Bombing case. And, yet, that was simply a planned
"rabbit trail." It was a "magician's
distraction" built into the operation from the
outset.
For so long as the mind may be fed false and distracting
information which is accepted as credible, the mind isn't
really investigating the case. It's just justifying a
pre-conceived conclusion.
I see "jewish" involvement, but I see it as a
planned distraction, just one more built-in rabbit trail
for that group who are pre-disposed not to buy the
"party line."
"Jews" aren't doing the moving and shaking for
"israeli" interests in anything like the
significance that Anglos are doing the moving and shaking
for Anglo, "one world order" interests.
Interests out of London are in the families who have been
on the "let's own and control the world" binge
for centuries. They've got "the plan" down to a
science at this stage. For so long as the public buy into
the "it's the foreigners who are doing it"
motif, then the "locals" may continue
unimpeded.
Harmon L. Taylor holmes221@earthlink.net
Editor's Note:The Wahabis (wä-hä'be)
Jocelyn Braddell
I personally think a lot about this terrible "Great
War for Civilisation" and have almost completed
reading Robert Fisk's book of that name. It seems to me
that as the last century passed the Israelis realised
that instability in the Saudi Arabian Royal family might
bring back a very real threat to their existence - which
is, by coincidence of the Israeli's foolish idea of
anticipating the problem with action, now immeasurably
enhanced. That threat is the resumption in strength of
the Wahabi Arabs. They are ruthless in their violence and
their numbers far out weigh any numbers that Israel can
muster against them. Famous for some centuries for
dominating the Arabian Peninsular, this possible
resurrection, which sprang to life in full force during
the Iraq/Iranian wars, seems to me to have been the
principle reason why Israel increased their defences with
every war-machine available and some inventions of their
own which have been under experiment more or less
secretly against the Palestinians during the last 30
years.
The English and French,we have to remember,
established the Wahabis branched families as sovereigns
in Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Iraq. These Wahabis in Iraq
were thrown down by Saddam Hussein and favoured and
controlled with his Baath Party, and that is one of the
reasons that Saddam was so cruel, he had to perpetually
be on his guard against the Sunni and the Shia inner
conflicts. In compensation for their folly and cowardice
the English have succumbed, since their preliminary
adventures in the early 1900s in the Middle East, to the
"Jewish" solution to their mounting problems -
Jewish bankers paid for diversions, - so English fears
that the Germans, the foremost "modern" nation
in Europe, for instance, would accomplish successful
treaties with these very Arabs, who had already revealed
a desire for German military training camps, went to war
in 1914 to put an end to that and other unwelcome German
developments. The English were prepared to train the
Ottoman aristocracy at their military institutions, but
not the Arabs, not yet.
I continue first with a collage of material from the
internet.
History from www.Answers.com :
Wahabi Sect was founded by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab
(c.17031791), Wahhabi mosques are simple and
without minarets, and the adherents dress plainly and do
not smoke tobacco or hashish. Driven from Medina for his
preaching, the founder of the Wahhabi sect went into the
NE Nejd and converted the Saud tribe. The Saudi sheik,
convinced that it was his religious mission to wage holy
war (jihad) against all other forms of Islam, began the
conquest of his neighbors in c.1763. By 1811 the Wahhabis
ruled all Arabia, except Yemen, from their capital at
Riyadh. The Ottoman sultan, nominally suzerain over
Arabia, had vainly sent out expeditions to crush them.
Only when the sultan called on Egypt for aid did he meet
success; by 1818 the Wahhabis were driven into the
desert. In the Nejd the Wahhabis collected their power
again and from 1821 to 1833 gained control over the
Persian Gulf coast of Arabia. The domain thereafter
steadily weakened; Riyadh was lost in 1884, and in 1889
the Saud family fled for refuge into the neighboring
state of Kuwait. The Wahhabi movement was to enjoy its
third triumph when it advanced from its capture of Riyadh
in 1902 to the reconstitution in 1932 of nearly all the
ancestral domain under the name Saudi Arabia, where it
remains dominant. Wahhabism served as an inspiration to
other Islamic reform movements from India and Sumatra to
North Africa and the Sudan, and during the 20th cent. has
influenced the Taliban of Aghanistan. In 1803, Saudis
conquered Mecca and Medina and destroyed various shrines,
such as the shrine built over the tomb of Fatima
Zahra, the daughter of Muhammad. They also wanted to
dismantle Muhammad's shrine as well but abandoned their
plan. The Saudis held the two cities until 1817, until
they were retaken by the Ottomans.
In 1818, the Ottoman forces invaded Najd, captured the
Saudi capital of Diriya and the Saudi emir He and his
chief lieutenants were taken to Istanbul and beheaded.
However, this did not end Wahhabism in Najd. The House of
Saud returned to power in 1824. The state lasted until
1899, when it was overthrown by the Emir of Hayel,
Mohammed Ibn Rasheed. Howeverthey reconquered Riyadh in
1902 and after a number of other conquests, founded the
modern Saudi state, Saudi
Arabia in 1932.
Hassan
al-Banna, the Egyptian founder of the Muslim
Brotherhood, is said to have been influenced by the
Wahhabis The Muslim Brotherhood also claimed to be
purifying and restoring original Islam. When the Muslim
Brotherhood was banned in various Middle Eastern
countries, Saudi Arabia gave refuge to Brotherhood
exiles. This seems to have set the stage for a mingling
of Brotherhood and Wahhabi thought under the aegis of the
term Salafism.
In essays and interviews, the great Middle
Eastern historian, Albert Hourani (1915
93) repeatedly drew attention to the weakness of
Oriental studies in Britain until the Second
World War. Thereafter, for a variety of reasons,
things changed for the better. One of the reasons
standards of Orientalist scholarship markedly
improved in Britain (and, of course, also in the
United States) was the influx of Jewish and other
anti-Nazi scholars in the 1930s and 1940s,
bringing with them continental standards and
techniques of scholarship. As Hourani put it,
when remembering his friendship with Richard
Walzer: He also told me much about the
central tradition of Islamic scholarship, that
expressed in German. Samuel Stern made a
similar impact on Hourani and on others who knew
him in Oxford. Any serious history of academic
Orientalism must take account of the diaspora of
Jewish scholarship to Europe, the United States
and what would eventually become the state of
Israel.Robert Irwin |
Also from the above source: In
Jew and Jesuit at the Origins of
Arabism: William Gifford Palgrave, Benjamin Braude
is mainly concerned with Palgraves dissemination of
the notions that the Jew and the Arab were natural allies
and that the British could make use of those Arabs who
were not Wahabis. Palgraves advocacy of an alliance
with anti-Wahabi Arabs was influential and later came to
be adopted by Hogarth and Lawrence.
The Wahabi militant Sunni movement dates from the mid
1700s when ibn Abd Al Wahab united Bedouins of the
Arabian Peninsula with a call for Islamic
re-purification. Jihad began in 1763 and by 1811, from
their capital at Riyadh, under the command of their
ruling family, the Sauds, the Wahabis controlled the
entire Arabian Peninsula with the exception of Yemen.
Within a decade the Ottomans had driven them back into
the desert; however in 1900 the Wahabis recaptured Riyadh
and never let go. Following World War I, when the
League of Nations distributed the rest of the Arabic
World among Britain, France and Russia, the Arabian
Peninsula remained in control of the Saud family --and
the Wahabi tribes. Despising the new Arabic
"nations" and their leaders no less than they
despised Europeans, in 1932 Saudi Arabia nevertheless
accepted formal recognition as an Islamic monarchy --the
only new Arabic state never to be a protectorate of
Europeans. It was also the only Arabic
state disinterested in achieving status as a nation,
disgusted with its neighbors' willingness to do so, and
neutral in response to the establishment of Israel.Richard
Labeviere
Labeviere describes how step by step the CIA
assisted the Wahabis in their mission, never doubting
their ability to control the process in such fashion that
only the destabilization of Arab nationalism but not the
creation of a new extremist Arabia would be achieved.
Money, much more than religious fanaticism was the
bonding agent used to create the world's newest and most
terrifying "mafia." Through the creation of a
financial empire of incredible sophistication --the
achievement primarily of Osama Bin Laden --an extremist
yet opportunistic network of terror emerged. Covertly
committed to Wahabi ideals, yet hungering for wealth and
power, this mafia enabled the CIA-Wahabi to recruit train
and reward terrorist organizations throughout the entire
Islamic world. Their first major accomplishment was
assisting the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt to undermine
Nasser, whose pan-Arabic nationalism was anathema to the
Wahabis and whose flirtation with Russia was unacceptable
to the CIA. Subsequently, the CIA-Wahabis mobilized
extremists in Pakistan, created the Taliban movement,
established extremist sects in Pakistan, Algeria, Yemen,
Indonesia, the Philippines, and elsewhere, and
established organized-criminal financial centers in
Malaysia, Madagascar, South Africa, Nigeria, Latin
American, Switzerland, England, Turkestan, and elsewhere.
Of crucial importance was that Iran's potential to create
its own pan-Arabic organization was virtually nullified
by CIA-Wahabi gamesmanship. Labeviere identifies key
operatives in each Moslem country and describes their
strategies.DWeiner
It is certainly the religious rivalry between the
Wahabi Sunni Arabs and the Iranian Shiite Arabs that
personifies the terrible events in Iraq and we have to
ask ourselves how the Israelis really thought to benefit
from this inevitable outcome of an invasion of Iraq.
Already two terrible wars were fought on that front
between Iraq and Iran and today it would appear that the
next idea is to spread this futile animosity and violence
into Iran and Syria. Does Israel think that they will
benefit out of this because America and England will
force a European solution on the Arabs as they did, or as
the English did, with the Ottomans?
However, my theory is that it is the great fear that the
Israelis have of this Arabic schism that has really
provoked the entire historic scenario of their quest for
and their success in receiving support as a developed
military nation par excellence by America and England.
Thus thousands of Jews are dependant and dependance
breeds certain reactions - the Jews of Israel and all
their Jewish supporters throughout the diaspora hate
their situation. They have succeeded now in causing a new
schism which is the outlook, world-wide, for and against
the Arabs - as Arabs merely, not as Sunni and Shia within
another conflict that we scarce understandand; also a
duplicate scenario for and against the Jews. Quite how
the Jewish fools that dominate the Republican and
Democrat politicians in America thought that they only
had to please the desires of "Arabs" in order
to disabuse Israel and stem a chaos that is now nothing
to do with the Palestinians, but everything to do with
the Jewish treatment of their colonial victims, we can
only guess. A refusal to learn of or understand history,
a refusal to experience history.
To explain stupidity it is easy to detest the Jews who
have forced this guilty material upon us all - but we see
that the "governments" of our nations, European
anyway, have no single qualm in supporting America, in
the senseless belief that arms and bombs win wars. A
senseless trauma from a century of European brutality
also prevails in both America and England,
"nations"who like undisciplined kids unobserved
(by secrecy) trick and treat their victims to every
violence from the dictionary. We, the public,do not
experience history either, at the moment, and the
internet, though many of us struggle valiantly with the
enemy of our own minds as Neitzsche advised, provides a
senseless whirlwind of theories of which mine, in
paragraphs of my own common sense, becomes
engulfed...................................?
Jocelyn Braddel, editor
|