update : A Week with
R.Fisk:
Published: 23 July 2006
Sunday 16 July
It is the first time I have actually seen a missile in
this war. They fly
too fast - or you are too busy trying to run away to look
for them - but
this morning, Abed and I actually see one pierce the
smoke above us. "Habibi (my friend)!" he cries,
and I start screaming "Turn the car round, turn it
round" and we drive away for our lives from the
southern suburbs. As we turn the corner there is a
shattering explosion and a mountain of grey smoke
blossoming from the road we have just left. What happened
to the men and women we saw running for their lives from
that Israeli rocket? We do not know. In air raids, all
you see is the few square yards around you. You get out
and you survive and that is enough.
I go home to my apartment on the Corniche and find that
the electricity is
cut. Soon, no doubt, the water will be cut. But I sit on
my balcony and
reflect that I am not crammed into a filthy hotel in
Kandahar or Basra but
living in my own home and waking each morning in my own
bed. Power cuts and fear and the lack of petrol now that
Israel is bombing gas stations mean that the canyon of
traffic which honks and roars outside my home until two
in the morning has gone. When I wake in the night, I hear
the birds and the wash of the Mediterranean and the
gentle brushing of palm leaves.
I went to buy groceries this evening. There is no more
milk but plenty of
water and bread and cheese and fish. When Abed pulls up
to let me out of the car, the man in the 4x4 behind us
puts his hand permanently on the horn, and when I get out
of Abed's car, he mouths the words "Kess
uchtak" at me. "Fuck your sister." It is
the first time I have been cursed in this war. The
Lebanese do not normally swear at foreigners. They are a
polite people. I hold my hand out, palm down and twist it
palm upwards in the Lebanese manner, meaning "what's
the problem?". But he drives away. Anyway, I don't
have a sister.
Monday 17 July
The phones are still working and my mobile chirrups like
a budgerigar. Too many of the calls are from friends who
want to know if they should flee Beirut or flee Lebanon
or from Lebanese who are outside Lebanon and want to know
if they should return. I can hear the bombs rumbling
across Hizbollah's area of the southern suburbs but I
cannot answer these questions. If I advise friends to
stay and they are killed, I am responsible. If I tell
them to leave and they are killed in their cars, I am
responsible. If I tell them to come back and they die, I
am responsible. So I tell them how dangerous
Lebanon has become and tell them it is their decision.
But I feel great sorrow for them. Many have been refugees
four times in 24 years. Today I am called by a Lebanese
woman with Lebanese and Iranian citizenship and one child
with a US passport and another with only a Lebanese
passport. Her situation is hopeless. I suggest she
travels to the Christian mountains around Faraya and try
to find a chalet. It will be safe there. I hope. I come
back from Kfar Chim where part of an Israeli missile or
an aircraft wing has just partially decapitated the
driver of a car. He looked so tragic, his head lolling
forward in the driver's seat, just looking at all
the blood splashing down his body on to the floor. Abed
was getting spooked because I spent too long at the
scene. The Israelis always come back.
"Habibi, you took too long. Never stay that long
again!" He is right. The
Israelis did come back and bombed the Lebanese army. Now
my housemaid Fidele is spooked. She thinks it is too
dangerous to travel from the Christian district of Beirut
to my home since the Israelis blew the top off the local
lighthouse 400 metres from my front door. Fidele is from
Togo and makes fantastic pizzas (I recommend her Pizza
Togolaisi to anyone) so I send Abed off to pick up her up
and bring her to my home for one hour. She puts my dirty
clothes in the washing machine, and after five minutes
the power goes off and we have to take them all out and
try again tomorrow.
Tuesday 18 July
At 3.45am, I wake to the sound of tank tracks and a big
military motor
heaving away in the darkness. I go downstairs to find
that the Lebanese army has positioned an American-made
armoured personnel carrier in the car park opposite my
home. It has been placed strategically under some palm
trees, as if this will stop Israeli aircraft from
spotting it. I don't like this at all and nor does my
landlord, Mustafa, who lives downstairs. The Lebanese
army is now an occasional target for the Israelis and
this little behemoth looks like a palm tree disguised as
a tank. Later in the morning, I call a general in the
army who is a friend of mine and army operations calls me
back to check the location. It takes an hour before they
find the car park on their maps. Then I receive another
call telling me that the APC is next to my home to
prevent the Hizbollah from using the car park to launch
another missile at an Israeli ship. The empty American
Community School is just up my road.
The Lebanese army is defending us. The first French
warship arrives to pick up French citizens fleeing
Lebanon. It steams proudly past my balcony. Many French
naval vessels are named after great military leaders, and
this particular anti-submarine frigate is called the
Jean-de-Vienne. I pad off to consult my little library of
French history
books. Jean de Vienne, it turns out, was a 14th-century
French admiral who raided the Sussex town of Rye and the
Isle of Wight and who was killed - oh lordy, lordy -
fighting in the Crusades against the Muslim Turks. A
suitable ship to start France's evacuation of the ancient
Crusader port of Beirut.
Wednesday 19 July
Now that the Israelis are destroying whole apartment
blocks in the Shia
southern suburbs - there is a permanent umbrella of smoke
over the seafront, stretching far out into the
Mediterranean - tens of thousands of Shia Muslims have
come to seek sanctuary in the undamaged part of Beirut,
in the parks and schools and beside the sea. They walk
back and forth outside my home, the women in chadors,
their bearded husbands and brothers silently looking at
the sea, their children playing happily around the palm
trees.
They speak to me with anger about Israel but choose not
to discuss the depth of cynicism of the Shia Hizbollah
who provoked Israel's brutality by
capturing two of its soldiers. As well as the Hizbollah,
the Israelis are now targeting food factories and trucks
and buses - not to mention 46
bridges - and the bin men are now reluctant to pick up
the rubbish skips
each night for fear their innocent rubbish truck is
mistaken for a missile
launcher. So no rubbish collection this morning.
The local Beirut papers are filled with photographs that
would never be seen in the pages of a British paper: of
decapitated babies and women with no legs or arms or of
old men in bits. Israel's air raids are promiscuous and -
when you see the results as we now do with our own eyes -
obscene. No doubt Hizbollah's equally innocent civilian
victims in Israel look like this but the slaughter in
Lebanon is on an infinitely more terrible scale. The
Lebanese look at these pictures and see them on
television - as does the rest of the Arab world - and I
wonder how many of them are provoked to think of another
9/11 or 7/7 or whatever the next date will be.
What does war do to people? Later, I am talking to an
Austrian journalist and idly ask what her father does.
"He drinks," she says. Why? "Because his
father was killed at Stalingrad."
I walk across with tea for the soldiers on the APC in the
car park. They are all from Baalbek, Shia Muslims. They
would never open fire on a Hizbollah missile crew. Then I
return home from another visit to the southern suburbs
and find they have gone, along with their behemoth. The
first good news of the day. The minister of finance holds
a press conference to talk of the billions of dollars of
damage being done to Lebanon by Israel's air raids.
"We have had pledges of aid from Saudi Arabia,
Kuwait and Qatar," he proudly announces. "And
from Syria and Iran?" the man from Irish radio asks,
naming Hizbollah's two principal supporters in the Muslim
world. "Nothing," the minister replies
dismissively.
Thursday 20 July
A bad day for messages. Phone calls from the States to
tell me I am an
anti-Semite for criticising Israel. Here we go again. To
call decent folk
anti-Semites is soon going to make anti-Semitism
respectable, I tell the
callers before asking them to tell the Israeli air force
to stop killing civilians. Then a fax from a Jewish
friend in California to tell me that a
man called Lee Kaplan - "a columnist for the Israel
National News", whatever that is - has condemned me
in print for developing a "high-paid speaking career
among anti-Semites". Unlike Benjamin Netanyahu and
many others I can think of, I never take money for
lecturing - ever - but to smear the thousands of ordinary
Americans who listen to me as anti-Semites is outrageous.
Another fax from the editor of the forthcoming paperback
edition of my book, apologising for bothering me at a
"very difficult (sic) time" but promising to
send me page proofs by DHL which is still operating to
Beirut. I go downtown to check this with DHL. Yes, the
man says, parcels for Lebanon are sent to Jordan and then
in a truck via Damascus to Beirut. A truck, I say to
myself. Ouch.
Friday 21 July
The Israelis have just bombed Khiam prison. An
interesting target since this was the jail in which
Israel's former proxy militia, the South Lebanon Army,
used to torture male prisoners by attaching electrodes to
their penises and female prisoners by electrocuting their
breasts. When the Israeli army retreated in 2000, the
Hizbollah turned the prison into a museum. Now the
evidence of the SLA's cruelty has been erased. Another
"terrorist" target. The power comes back at
home at 11pm and I watch Israel's consul general, Arye
Mekel, telling the BBC that Israel is "doing the
Lebanese a favour" by bombing Hizbollah, insisting
that "most Lebanese appreciate what we are
doing". So now I understand. The Lebanese must thank
the Israelis for destroying their lives and
infrastructure. They must be grateful for all the air
strikes and the dead children. It's as if the Hizbollah
claimed that Israelis should be grateful to them for
attacking Zionism. How far can self-delusion reach?
Saturday 22 July
I have coffee in my landlord's garden and he climbs an
old wooden ladder
into his fig tree and brings me a plate of fruit.
"Every day it gives us our
figs," he tells me. "We sit under our tree in
the afternoon and with the
breeze off the sea, it is like air conditioning." I
look at his little paradise of pot plants and sip my
Arabic coffee from a little blue mug. We watch the
warships sliding into Beirut port. "What will happen
when all the
foreigners have gone?" he asks. That's what we are
all asking. We shall
find out this week.
What I am watching in Lebanon each day
is an outrage
By Robert Fisk in Mdeirej, Central Lebanon
The Independent 15 July 2006
The beautiful viaduct that soars over the mountainside
here has become
a "terrorist" target. The Israelis attacked the
international highway
from Beirut to Damascus just after dawn yesterday and
dropped a bomb
clean through the central span of the Italian-built
bridge ? a symbol
of Lebanon's co-operation with the European Union ?
sending concrete
crashing hundreds of feet down into the valley beneath.
It was the
pride of the murdered ex-prime minister Rafik Hariri, the
face of a
new, emergent Lebanon. And now it is a
"terrorist" target.
So I drove gingerly along the old mountain road towards
the Bekaa
yesterday ? the Israeli jets were hissing through the sky
above me ?
turned the corner once I rejoined the highway, and found
a 50ft crater
with an old woman climbing wearily down the side on her
hands and
knees, trying to reach her home in the valley that
glimmered to the
east. This too had become a "terrorist" target.
It is now the same all over Lebanon. In the southern
suburbs ? where
the Hizbollah, captors of the two missing Israeli
soldiers, have their
headquarters ? a massive bomb had blasted off the sides
of apartment
blocks next to a church, splintering windows and crashing
balconies
down on to parked cars. This too had become a
"terrorist" target.
One man was brought out shrieking with pain, covered in
blood. Another
"terrorist" target. All the way to the airport
were broken bridges,
holed roads. All these were "terrorist"
targets. At the airport,
tongues of fire blossomed into the sky from aircraft fuel
storage
tanks, darkening west Beirut. These too were now
"terrorist" targets.
At Jiyeh, the Israelis attacked the power station. This
too was a
"terrorist" target.
Yet when I drove to the actual headquarters of the
Hizbollah, a tall
building in Haret Hreik, it was totally undamaged. Only
last night did
the Israelis manage to hit it.
So can the Lebanese be forgiven ? can anyone here be
forgiven ? for
believing that the Israelis have a greater interest in
destroying
Lebanon than they do in their two soldiers?
No wonder Middle East Airlines, the national Lebanese
airline, put
crews into its four stranded Airbuses at Beirut airport
early yesterday
and sneaked them out of the country for Amman before the
Israelis
realised they were under power and leaving.
European politicians have talked about Israel's
"disproportionate"
response to Wednesday's capture of its soldiers. They are
wrong. What I
am now watching in Lebanon each day is an outrage. How
can there be any
excuse ? any ? for the 73 dead Lebanese civilians blown
apart these
past three days?
The same applies, of course, to the four Israeli
civilians killed by
Hizbollah rockets. But ? please note ? the exchange rate
of Israeli
civilian lives to Lebanese civilian lives now stands at
one to more
than 15. This does not include two children atomised in
their home in
Dweir on Thursday whose bodies cannot be found. Their six
brothers and
sisters were buried yesterday, with their mother and
father. Another
"terrorist" target. So was a neighbouring
family with five children who
were also buried yesterday. Another "terrorist"
target.
Terrorist, terrorist, terrorist. There is something
perverse about all
this, the slaughter and the massive destruction and the
self-righteous,
constant, cancerous use of the word
"terrorist". No, let us not forget
that the Hizbollah broke international law, crossed the
Israeli border,
killed three Israeli soldiers, captured two others and
dragged them
back through the border fence. It was an act of
calculated ruthlessness
that should never allow Hizbollah's leader, Hassan
Nasrallah, to grin
so broadly at his press conference. It has brought
unparalleled tragedy
to countless innocents in Lebanon. And of course, it has
led Hizbollah
to fire at least 170 Katyusha rockets into Israel.
But what would happen if the powerless Lebanese
government had
unleashed air attacks across Israel the last time
Israel's troops
crossed into Lebanon? What if the Lebanese air force then
killed 73
Israeli civilians in bombing raids in Ashkelon, Tel Aviv
and Israeli
West Jerusalem? What if a Lebanese fighter aircraft
bombed Ben Gurion
airport? What if a Lebanese plane destroyed 26 road
bridges across
Israel? Would it not be called " terrorism"? I
rather think it would.
But if Israel was the victim, it would probably also be
World War
Three.
Of course, Lebanon cannot attack Tel Aviv. Its air force
comprises
three ancient Hawker Hunters and an equally ancient fleet
of
Vietnam-era Huey helicopters. Syria, however, has
missiles that can
reach Tel Aviv. So Syria ? which Israel rightly believes
to be behind
Wednesday's Hizbollah attack ? is not going to be bombed.
It is Lebanon
which must be punished.
The Israeli leadership intends to "break" the
Hizbollah and destroy its
"terrorist cancer". Really? Do the Israelis
really believe they can
"break" one of the toughest guerrilla armies in
the world? And how?
There are real issues here. Under UN Security Council
Resolution 1559 ?
the same resolution that got the Syrian army out of
Lebanon ? the Shia
Muslim Hizbollah should have been disarmed. They were not
because, if
the Lebanese Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora, had tried to
do so, the
Lebanese army would have had to fight them and the army
would almost
certainly have broken apart because most Lebanese
soldiers are Shia
Muslims. We could see the restarting of the civil war in
Lebanon ? a
fact which Nasrallah is cynically aware of ? but attempts
by Siniora
and his cabinet colleagues to find a new role for
Hizbollah, which has
a minister in the government (he is Minister of Labour)
foundered. And
the greatest danger now is that the Lebanese government
will collapse
and be replaced by a pro-Syrian government which could
reinvite the
Syrians back into the country.
So there's a real conundrum to be solved. But it's not
going to succeed
with the mass bombing of the country by Israel. Nor the
obsession with
terrorists, terrorists, terrorists.
Marwaheen Massacre
By Robert Fisk
07/16/06 "The
Independent" -- -It will be called
the massacre of Marwaheen. All the civilians killed by
the Israelis had been ordered to abandon their homes in
the border village by the Israelis themselves a few hours
earlier. Leave, they were told by loudspeaker; and leave
they did, 20 of them in a convoy of civilian cars. That's
when the Israeli jets arrived to bomb them, killing 20
Lebanese, at least nine of them children. The local fire
brigade could not put out the fires as they all burned
alive in the inferno. Another "terrorist"
target had been eliminated.
Yesterday, the Israelis even produced more
"terrorist" targets - petrol stations in the
Bekaa Valley all the way up to the frontier city of
Hermel in northern Lebanon and another series of bridges
on one of the few escape routes to Damascus, this time
between Chtaura and the border village of Masnaa.
Lebanon, as usual, was paying the price for the
Hizbollah-Israeli conflict - as Hizbollah no doubt
calculated they would when they crossed the Israeli
frontier on Wednesday and captured two Israeli soldiers
close to Marwaheen.
But who is really winning the war? Not Lebanon, you may
say, with its more than 90 civilian dead and its
infrastructure steadily destroyed in hundreds of Israeli
air raids. But is Israel winning? Friday night's missile
attack on an Israeli warship off the coast of Lebanon
suggests otherwise. Four Israeli sailors were killed, two
of them hurled into the sea when a tele-guided
Iranian-made missile smashed into their Hetz-class
gunboat just off Beirut at dusk. Those Lebanese who had
endured the fire of Israeli gunboats on the coastal
highway over many years were elated. They may not have
liked Hizbollah - but they hated the Israelis.
Only now, however, is a truer picture emerging of the
battle for southern Lebanon and it is a fascinating,
frightening tale. The original border crossing, the
capture of the two soldiers and the killing of three
others was planned, according to Hassan Nasrallah, the
Hizbollah leader who escaped assassination by the
Israelis on Friday evening, more than five months ago.
And Friday's missile attack on the Israeli gunboat was
not the last-minute inspiration of a Hizbollah member who
just happened to see the warship.
It now appears clear that the Hizbollah leadership -
Nasrallah used to be the organisation's military
commander in southern Lebanon - thought carefully through
the effects of their border crossing, relying on the
cruelty of Israel's response to quell any criticism of
their action within Lebanon. They were right in their
planning. The Israeli retaliation was even crueller than
some Hizbollah leaders imagined, and the Lebanese quickly
silenced all criticism of the guerrilla movement.
Hizbollah had presumed the Israelis would cross into
Lebanon after the capture of the two soldiers and they
blew up the first Israeli Merkava tank when it was only
35 feet inside the country. All four Israeli crewmen were
killed and the Israeli army moved no further forward. The
long-range Iranian-made missiles which later exploded on
Haifa had been preceded only a few weeks ago by a
pilotless Hizbollah drone aircraft which surveyed
northern Israel and then returned to land in eastern
Lebanon after taking photographs during its flight. These
pictures not only suggested a flight path for Hizbollah's
rockets to Haifa; they also identified Israel's
top-secret military air traffic control centre in Miron.
The next attack - concealed by Israel's censors - was
directed at this facility. Codenamed "Apollo",
Israeli military scientists work deep inside mountain
caves and bunkers at Miron, guarded by watchtowers,
guard-dogs and barbed wire, watching all air traffic
moving in and out of Beirut, Damascus, Amman and other
Arab cities. The mountain is surmounted by clusters of
antennae which Hizbollah quickly identified as a military
tracking centre. Before they fired rockets at Haifa, they
therefore sent a cluster of missiles towards Miron. The
caves are untouchable but the targeting of such a secret
location by Hizbollah deeply shocked Israel's military
planners. The "centre of world terror" - or
whatever they imagine Lebanon to be - could not only
breach their frontier and capture their soldiers but
attack the nerve-centre of the Israeli northern military
command.
Then came the Haifa missiles and the attack on the
gunboat. It is now clear that this successful military
operation - so contemptuous of their enemy were the
Israelis that although their warship was equipped with
cannon and a Vulcan machine gun, they didn't even provide
the vessel with an anti-missile capability - was also
planned months ago. Once the Hetz-class boats appeared,
Hizbollah positioned a missile crew on the coast of west
Beirut not far from Jnah, a crew trained over many weeks
for just such an attack. It took less than 30 seconds for
the Iranian-made missile to leave Beirut and hit the
vessel square amidships, setting it on fire and killing
the sailors.
Ironically, the Israelis themselves had invited
journalists on an "embedded" trip with their
navy only hours earlier - they were allowed to film the
ships' guns firing on Lebanon - and the moment Hizbollah
hit the warship on Friday, Hizbollah's television
station, Al-Manar, began showing the "embedded"
film. It was a slick piece of propaganda.
The Israelis were yesterday trumpeting the fact that the
missile was made in Iran as proof of Iran's involvement
in the Lebanon war. This was odd reasoning. Since almost
all the missiles used to kill the civilians of Lebanon
over the past four days were made in Seattle, Duluth and
Miami in the United States, their use already suggests to
millions of Lebanese that America is behind the
bombardment of their country.
© 2006 Independent News and Media
Limited
Beirut
Waits
By ROBERT FISK
It's about Syria. That was the
frightening message delivered by Damascus yesterday when
it allowed its Hizbollah allies to cross the UN Blue Line
in southern Lebanon, kill three Israeli soldiers, capture
two others and demand the release of Lebanese prisoners
in Israeli jails.
Within hours, a country
that had begun to believe in peace--without a single
Syrian soldier left on its soil--found itself once more
at war.
Israel held the
powerless Lebanese government responsible--as if the
sectarian and divided cabinet in Beirut can control
Hizbollah. That is Syria's message. Fouad Siniora,
Lebanon's affable Prime Minister, may have thought he was
running the country but it is President Bashar Assad in
Damascus who can still bring life or death to a land that
lost 150,000 lives in 15 years of civil conflict.
And there is one certain
bet that Syria will rely on; that despite all Israel's
threats of inflicting "pain" on Lebanon, this
war will run out of control until--as has so often
happened in the past--Israel itself calls for a ceasefire
and releases prisoners. Then the international
big-hitters will arrive and make their way to the real
Lebanese capital Damascus, not Beirut--and appeal for
help.
That is probably the
plan. But will it work? Israel has threatened Lebanon's
newly installed infrastructure and Hizbollah has
threatened Israel with further conflict. And therein lies
the problem; to get at Hizbollah, Israel must send its
soldiers into Lebanon--and then it will lose more
soldiers.
Indeed when a single
Merkava tank crossed the border into Lebanon yesterday
morning, it struck a Hizbollah mine, which killed three
more Israelis.
Certainly Hizbollah's
attack broke the United Nations rules in southern
Lebanon--a "violent breach" of the Blue Line,
it was called by Geir Pedersen, the senior UN official in
the country--and was bound to unleash the air force,
tanks and gunboats of Israel on to this frail, dangerous
country. Many Lebanese in Beirut were outraged when gangs
of Hizbollah supporters drove through the streets of the
capital with party flags to "celebrate" the
attack on the border.
Christian members of the
Lebanese government were voicing increasing frustration
at the Shia Muslim militia's actions--which only proved
how powerless the Beirut administration is.
By nightfall, Israel's
air raids had begun to spread across the country--the
first civilians to die were killed when an aircraft
bombed a small road bridge at Qasmiyeh--but would they go
even further and include a target in Syria? This would be
the gravest escalation so far and would have US as well
as UN diplomats appealing for that familiar, tired
quality--"restraint".
And prisoner swaps is
probably all that will come of this. In January 2004, for
example, Israel freed 436 Arab prisoners and released the
bodies of 59 Lebanese for burial, in return for an
Israeli spy and the bodies of three Israeli soldiers.
As long ago as 1985,
three Israeli soldiers captured in 1982 were traded for
1,150 Lebanese and Palestinian prisoners. So Hizbollah
knows--and the Israelis know--how this cruel game is
played. How many have to die before the swaps begin is a
more important question.
What is also clear is
that for the first time Israel is facing two Islamist
enemies--in southern Lebanon and in Gaza--rather than
nationalist guerrillas. The Palestinian Hamas movement's
spokesmen in Lebanon yesterday denied that there was any
co-ordination with Hizbollah. This may be literally true
but Hizbollah timed its attack when Arab feelings are
embittered by the international sanctions placed on the
democratically elected Hamas government and then the war
in Gaza. Hizbollah will ride the anger over Gaza in the
hope of escaping condemnation for its capture and killing
of Israelis yesterday.
And there is one more
little, sinister question. In past violence of this kind,
Syria's power was controlled by the Hafez Assad, one of
the shrewdest Arabs in modern history. But there are
those--including Lebanese politicians--who believe that
Bashar, the son, lacks his late father's wisdom and
understanding of power. This is a country, remember,
whose own Minister of Interior allegedly committed
suicide last year and whose soldiers had to leave Lebanon
amid suspicion that Syria had set up the murder of Rafik
Hariri, Lebanon's former prime minister, last year. All
this may now seem academic. But Damascus remains, as
always, the key.
Robert Fisk is a
reporter for The Independent and author of Pity the Nation. He is also a contributor to
CounterPunch's collection, The Politics of Anti-Semitism. Fisk's new book is The Conquest of the Middle
East. www.counterpunch.org
|