JULY 2007
WAR CRIMES TRIAL TO BE ANNOUNCED FOR BUSH,CHENEY & RUMSFELD
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The SEPTEMBER 11 TREASON INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR ACT
MEDIA ADVISORY:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
Date: 2007-06-21, 12:49PM MST
MEDIA ADVISORY: Independent Scientist Leuren Moret and International
Lawyer Alfred Webre to call for International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes
Tribunal
International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
VANCOUVER, B.C. - In order to prosecute the 9/11 perpetrators under the
9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act, Independent Scientist/DU Radiation
Expert Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre will call for
the establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal,
in a public announcement to be made at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth
Conference on Sunday June 24, 2007.
According to Moret and Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag Operation by an
international War Crimes Racketeering Organization, to provide a pretext
to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of
Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil and
uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security
state-system world-wide; and to implement the final stages of a world
Depopulation policy. The International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
would be convened under the jurisdiction of the Kuala Lumpur
International War Crimes Tribunal, established in February 2007 as a
permanent citizen's Tribunal by The Perdana Global Peace Organization,
chaired by Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, former Prime Minister of
Malaysia, who is the first prominent world leader to take up the DU
radiation issue.
The purpose of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal is to criminalize
war, and to enforce the prohibitions of Aggressive war and War Crimes,
which since 1945 have been prohibited by the Nuremberg Principles,
through a permanent citizen's war crimes tribunal and through the
principles of Natural law, restorative justice, and International law.
Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, an international lawyer and Member of
the Pro Tem Committee for the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes
Tribunal to be held in 2008, will make the announcement in an address to
the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, on the issue of "The International
9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal: The 9/11 False Flag Operation as a
War Crime under International Law."
DATE/TIME OF 9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL ANNOUNCEMENT:
Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 6PM PDT @ Main Stage
The Maritime Labour Centre
1880 Triumph St., Vancouver, B.C. V5L 1K3
CANADA
The purpose of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to prosecute the
perpetrators of the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001, under the
prima facie evidence assembled for the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act
for War Crimes, including Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Crimes
Against Peace (now Aggressive War), as set out in the Nuremberg
Principles, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court.
The 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act appoints an Independent Prosecutor
under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to
prosecute Treason against the United States of America by U.S. President
George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of
Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and
carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the
U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or
causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on
September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the
U.S. Constitution provides that, "Sect. 3. Treason against the United
States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to
their enemies, giving them aid and comfort...."
The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that
the named individuals - U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice
President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H.
Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III
Treason on September 11, 2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum
to the U.S. Congress accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.
This Legislative Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David
Ray Griffin, independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred
Webre.
The facts recited in the Congressional Memorandum constitute prima
facie evidence that the named individuals---U.S. President George W.
Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense
Donald H. Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and
jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article
III(3) of the U.S. Constitution. For the full Congressional Memorandum,
go to:
Congressional Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
A Summary of the threshold of prima facie evidence is as follows.
I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not
have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon,
under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually
inconsistent accounts of NORAD's response, which means that at least two
of them are false. Moreover, the third account, articulated by the 9/11
Commission, is contradicted by a wide range of facts, including evidence
that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion. There must have been
stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels
of the Pentagon and the White House.
II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers
and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the
application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible
space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). But al-Qaeda operatives could
not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the
explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight
down. Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained command and control of
advanced Directed Energy Weapons, Microfusion devices (4th generation
mini-nuclear weapons), bunker-busters, or other exotic weapons
alternatives that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in
the US Defense arsenal. The controlled demolition and/or Directed Energy
Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application, therefore, had to be the
work of U.S. Government and other insiders. That President Bush was one
of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin
were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at
the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the
removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which at a crime scene is
normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have
occurred only with the consent of the President and the Secretary of
Defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these
strikes with the demolition of the buildings - and/or with the use of
exotic weapons such as Directed Energy Weapons - implies their
involvement in the latter as well.
The design of the International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is
to provide a judicial, impartial forum for the evaluation of forensic
evidence.
At present, there are several alternative, though not mutually
exclusive models of how the WTC Towers fell, in a controlled demolition.
While there is compelling evidence for one model over another at this
time, the purpose of an impartial forum is to allow evidence to be
presented. This includes evidence of traditional chemical means of
controlled demolition, as well as more exotic means, as warranted by the
forensic evidence. The models of controlled demolition to be explored,
thus would include at least: traditional thermite and thermate exposives;
Microfusion devices (4th generation nuclear weapons); and Directed Energy
Weapons (DEW), be they land-based, air-based, or space-based.
Correspondence with the USAF Kirtland Base Directed Energy Directorate
does not rule out the existence of Directed Energy Weapons in these
configurations.
III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the
attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could
not be true is evident from many facts: Alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour's
incompetence; the choice of the Pentagon west wing as the target; the
impossibility of a commercial airliner's coming back to Washington
undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of
physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the
strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story,
the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal
of evidence, and the government's refusal to release videos of the
strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the
involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.
9/11 & DU at the Pentagon
In April, 2007, Leuren Moret exposed the U.S. military's illegal use of
Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in target practice in Hawaii, in violation
of U.S. military environmental regulations. The elevated radiation
readings she recorded were carried by ABC-TV news in Hawaii on April 29 &
30, 2007.
Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from
the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001. Two days after
9/11, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the
Pentagon crash site rubble was radioactive and that the probable
contaminant was Depleted Uranium (DU). The entry and exit holes through
the Pentagon crash site were the signature of a kinetic energy
penetrator, such as a Cruise missile, and the term "punch-out hole" was
written by crash site investigators over the exit hole. This is a
military term used for kinetic energy penetrators. Major Doug Rokke,
former Director of the Gulf War I DU Cleanup Team, reported that an email
from the Pentagon 30 minutes after impact confirmed a Cruise missile hit
the Pentagon on 9/11. Recently vast Uranium deposits have been reported
in Khazakhstan and Afghanistan. Khazakhstan is expected to out-produce
Canada (now the world's top producer) in Uranium production within 12
years. This exposes the economic interests behind the events of 9/11,
specifically the unjustified military attack by the U.S. on Afghanistan
using 9/11 as a pretext.
IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also
indicated by President Bush's remaining at the Florida Elementary school
after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the
United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes
sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there
would be no attack on the school.
V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the
Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of
Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta in conjunction with the false
claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration
insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the Presidential
Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) and when he issued the shoot-down
authorization.
VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush
administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact
that they had some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and
Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation
of the military---that would likely be possible only in the event of "a
new Pearl Harbor."
The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes
Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have
failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of
9/11. Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of
Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally
reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum
following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with
representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. The Chairman
refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior
Staff. The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush
and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.
9/11 As A War Crime
The False Flag Operation of 9/11 was the pretext for, and an integral
part of the planning and execution of the illegal War of Aggression in
2001 against Afghanistan and of War Crimes committed by the United States
in Afghanistan, as found by the Final Judgment, International Criminal
Tribunal for Afghanistan at Tokyo. The Court found the use of Depleted
Uranium (DU) weapons in Afghanistan to constitute War Crimes, Genocide,
Crimes Against Humanity, and Omnicide. The False Flag Operation of 9/11
is a legal component of these War Crimes, and the perpetrators of 9/11
are guilty Aggressive War, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and War
Crimes.
International 9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
GOOGLE VIDEO: The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal (Alfred Webre)
http://video.google.ca/videopl
References:
9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act - Executive Summary
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
Congressional Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
9/11 Disappearing Explosions - Brasscheck TV (Video)
http://www.brasschecktv.com
Leuren Moret - Bio
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd - Bio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
KITV Hawaii - Depleted Uranium Hawaii (2 Mins 33 Seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
Leuren Moret - Expert Testimony at the Tokyo International Tribunal for
War Crimes in Afghanistan
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
DU: Dirty Bombs, Missiles, Bullets by Leuren Moret
http://www.ratical.org/radiati
From Hiroshima to Iraq, 61 years of uranium wars,
A suicidal, genocidal, omnicidal course by Leuren Moret
http://www.globalresearch.ca
CONTACT:
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Campaign for Cooperation in Space
Tel: 604-733-8134
Email: peace@peaceinspace.org
International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com
Copyright © 2007 craigslist, inc. terms of use privacy policy
feedback Reply to: pers-357223855@craigslist.org