Jews and gays - birds of a feather?
By Simon Jonesİ2004
sj958@yahoo.com <mailto:sj958@yahoo.com>
Ben Stein, noting that about 60% of the top positions in
Hollywood are held by Jews, says "Do Jews run
Hollywood? You bet they do - and what of it?" Well,
let's look at what this spectacular freedom for Jews
during the past half century has resulted in:
*Israel and America are terrorizing the entire world with
unrelenting,
vicious, bloody wars and occupations.
*The collapse of the only serious attempt (if it was
indeed serious) by
Israel to make peace with the Palestinians in the mid-90s
and the subsequent
ascendancy of the Zionist neocons in Washington have
ended any illusions
about the innocence of the Jews in all this.
*Apart from Israel, most Jews (including a half million
Israelis) live in
the US; 80% blindly support Israel; many of the fanatical
settlers in
occupied Palestine are American Jews; and the US
government provides $6
BILLION per year to Israel in foreign aid (which is
promptly used to further
persecute Palestinians). All US politicians must pass the
AIPAC test before
they can be 'elected' formally (the ADL and the AJC, all
basically lobbyists
for Israel, do not have to register as agents of a
foreign government). A
truly vicious circle, if there ever was one.
*Meanwhile, the entire international world order, so
painstakingly
constructed over the past 300 years is collapsing, as
nuclear and
environmental Armageddon approach with each passing day.
While goys are equally complicit in this nightmare world
order, the fact
that Jews have never had it so good and have climbed to
the top of the West's
economic, cultural and political ladder with
unprecedented speed cannot be
ignored. Enough with the coincidences already!
It is astounding that so few people have removed their
blinkers. Mine were ripped off early for a very good
reason: though not Jewish (though who really knows?), and
from a well-off white family, I have the (dubious or
otherwise) distinction of being a member of another
persecuted minority, one
strikingly similar to the Jews, though with significant
differences. Yes, gay, faggot, queer, pansy, poof, etc.
Watching another prominent minority GAIN, and then
promptly MISUSE its newly won freedom, I have become
increasingly angry. The justified reaction against the
injustices that Jews are, to a very large extent,
responsible for these days is gaining momentum, and I can
see it spilling over onto other groups - my own not
surprisingly comes immediately to mind.
I generally resist identifying myself as 'gay', as I
consider it is no business of anyone besides my sexual
partner, and it has nothing to do with the quality of the
work I do, or even how I relate to my friends. But the
times demand that we wrestle with both the Jewish and gay
issues - in a way they are key issues of modern society
and must be dealt with, so my cards are on the table.
Similarities
Like Jews, gays have ancient roots of persecution and
have been mostly outcasts since the rise of Christianity
(though the roots of persecution, ironically, are in the
Torah). This persecution complex - I know it first-hand -
leaves an indelible mark on one's character - defiance of
a hypocritical, unjust society, a desire for revenge, a
feeling of superiority (warranted or not), a lack of
patriotism./ *(i)So gays
automatically empathize with Jews. At the same time, gays
often crossed paths with Jews professionally - in the
arts, as writers, philosophers, councilors, etc.
In Jungian terms we can say that gays function as a
psychological shadow for straights (having a dominance of traits usually
associated with the opposite sex), just as Jews are a
kind of social shadow for mainstream society (practicing
forbidden activities such as usury (updated today to
include stock market fraud and the like) and fomenting
revolution). Think of Jews and gays as the spice in
society, giving it flavor, variety, acting as catalysts
in the arts and in social relations.
.To be or to do - that is the question
Gays and Jews face a common problem of just what makes
them what they are. 'Is it a breath mint or a candy
mint?' Is there some genetic code at work or is a gay/
Jewish identity merely a social construct?
Jews love to attack critics by labelling them
'anti-Semites', a late 19th century construct which is
completely inaccurate, as most Jews are Caucasian
Ashkenazy, while Arabs and the relatively few Sephardic
Jews are the real Semites. It is a term which underlines
the essentially racist attitude of contemporary Jews in
describing themselves, anti-SEMITE emphasizing inherent
and unchangeable inborn qualities (vs anti-Jewish,
emphasizing the Jew as a socio-religious construct, a
reaction to the dominant society). The Jews can 't face a
reasoned, rational objection to their IDEAS, and stick to
the mantra "It is because of what we are, not of
what we do."
Few gays feel comfortable defining themselves as genetic
oddities (only the militants), and apart from people born
with both sexual organs, gays only begin to differentiate
themselves at the earliest at 5-10 years of age. Most do
not 'realize' they are gay until puberty or even as late
as 30-40. In reality, neither group really has much of a
claim for genetic exceptionalism.
So this similarity in the problem of even defining what
'gay' or 'Jew' means is in fact a very big difference.
Unlike the Jews, who secretly or proudly relish the idea
of genetic difference (read: superiority),*(ii) the gut instinct of gays is
to dismiss this as the loony idea of some homophobic
genetic engineer, hoping to find the 'faulty' gene and
provide an instant 'cure'. Even if we accept that being
gay has some genetic basis, and while gays (likes Jews)
are economically much better off than others, there has
never been a serious attempt to maintain that gays are
SUPERIOR in any way
to straights.
Jews will insist that they are not racists, that it is
the goys that are racist, and then, without batting an eye, talk about their DNA *(iii)and defend unconditionally
the only blatantly racist state - Israel, unique among
sovereign states (except for Nazi Germany). Judaism is a
veritable 'shell game': a religion, no - an identity,
oops - a culture, wrong again - a tradition. It is a
slippery fish - whatever fits the bill at the moment.
Clearly not fair, but you question it at your own risk.
The standard response to the slightest whiff of criticism
is "Anti-Semite!" Whatever you may think of
gays (queers, faggots, etc) or whether they were found
under a cabbage leaf or not, they clearly define
themselves by what they DO as predominantly MSM
(men-having-sex-with-men) or WSW in the case of lesbians.
There's no confusion there. The buck stops here, if
you'll forgive the pun.
Assimilationist or outsider
This brings me to the second important difference. While
most gays are 'that way' from an early age (5-10 years
old), and like Jews have had to live their lives as
outcasts, gays have traditionally never had much group
identity. And they have mostly (with varying degrees of
success) tried to assimilate, hide themselves, marry and
otherwise blend in to society. Indeed gays have almost
always had sexual relations primarily with straights. The
very idea of gays living in a closed 'ghetto' is a very
late-20thC one, and like the Jewish ghetto (or Israel, as
a monster Jewish ghetto) is bizarre, if not repulsive, to
most gays, despite Greenwich village and San Francisco as
'gay meccas'. Mecca, after all, is a place of pilgrimage.
Who in their right mind wants to LIVE there?
Jews, however, at least those who have not assimilated,
are famous for stubbornly remaining aloof, reveling in
their persecution as God's Chosen People, alienated from
society. Otto Weininger, a 19thC German Jewish philosophy
described Judaism as a state of mind. That's cutting to
the quick. Yes, for some the focus is on the rituals, for
some - the tribal solidarity, for others - the supposed
superiority, etc. But while you may be born a Jew,
there's nothing to stop you from NOT being a Jew whenever
you like, as most have done in the past, including
hundreds of thousands of immigrants to America over the
past 200 years. It's as easy as (apple) pie to move,
change your name, join a church and blend in. But these
assimilationists are no longer Jews. As for gays, they
can never REALLY stop being gay, despite bogus claims by
Bible-thumping evangelicals. The gay
'state of mind' always comes up against the brick wall,
the implacable, insatiable sex drive, whatever IT is.
Let history judge
Historically, wherever Jews settled and maintained their
Jewish identity, they eventually gained more and more
economic, political and cultural power, and then started
to manipulate it for their own group purposes, inevitably
inciting an angry reaction. Today's wave of revulsion in
light of Israel's outrages backed by a Zionist-inspired,
corrupt US government is just the tip of a huge, ancient
iceberg, which despite global warming (read: holocaust
worship and human rights legislation) refuses to melt.
Gays have also been persecuted - mostly by the church,
though Islam and Judaism (yes, our fellow sufferers!)
traditionally also forbid and punish homosexuality. But
there were never any instances of hysterical, mass
expulsion of gays, as there were of Jews. Why? Clearly,
because gays never really posed a threat to the dominant
society.
Will the real Chosen People please stand up?
Indeed, in many pre-Christian cultures (including the
native American), gays were often respected as special
people and made shamans, priests, artists, musicians etc.
Ironically there is a much stronger argument in the
million-odd years of human existence that the 'Chosen
People' are in fact GAYS rather than Jews. But even if
this is true, you will never find gays creating a state
and migrating en masse to live there (kicking out the
natives in the process). A (brave) Jewish comedian
recently commented to the effect that 'Jews are like
spice, a little is good. Putting them all together in one
country is a recipe for indigestion.' The same goes for
gays - living on the edge of the mainstream society, they
provide that 'je ne sais quoi' for the social stew. No
wonder Jews and gays have produced so many great
comedians, able to stand back and poke fun at mainstream
society.
Effects of freedom for gays and Jews
How many parallels, coincidences there are! The most
significant, of course, is the WWII holocausts against
BOTH gays and Jews, and the subsequent post-WWII process
of creating TOTAL freedom for both Jews and gays. Not
only the ADL can take people to court for perceived
slights these days, but gays can too (though it's much
harder). Painting swastikas on Jewish grave and
gay-bashing are both grounds for violation of hate crimes
(again, much harder for gays, and there is much more
gay-bashing than Jew-bashing). We can both publicly
flaunt what many perceive as antisocial behavior and not
suffer any consequences. Books about the holocaust are
part of children's curricula, just as story books where
'Susie has two daddies' (at least in
the most 'progressive' schools).
Look at the effect of Jewish freedom, the triumph of the
Jewish idea, on the modern world: the eternal torment of
war in the Middle East, the collapse of the Soviet Union
(a largely Jewish intellectual elite - a million people -
up and left in the 1970s-90s), the rampant
commercialization of the entire world, the accelerated
destruction of nature ('And God made Man to have dominion
over
the Earth')... Within US politics, where Jews have gained
control of the main levers of power, we see total
cynicism and corruption, blind support of one Israeli
outrage after another, an all-out war against Islam. Why?
It is not all the fault of the Jews of course, but their
prominence in all facets
of Western society means they have to account for
themselves. Freedom implies responsibility for one's
actions.
I would phrase it as 'They want to have their cake and
eat it.' They have full, equal rights now in the advanced
countries, have gained unprecedented control of these
societies, and yet continue to support their own racist,
outcast state, persecuting and displacing millions of
Muslims. Any criticism
of them and this 'shitty little country' is simply
dismissed as anti-Semitism; they refuse to recognize that
they are in fact to blame.*(iv)
What of the effect of gay freedom? Gays, lacking a
cohesive tribal identity, have no clout economically
(except maybe as consumers of expensive toiletry and
clothing). Politically, true, gays have successfully
lobbied and won remarkable changes to laws in their
favor. The crowning achievement (the equivalent of the
creation of the state of Israel for Jews?) is/ will be
marriage rights. The icing on the cake after decades of
pushing the loosening of morals from the 1960s on.
But it is culturally and socially that gays have had the
most influence, and the results are mixed at best. The
past 40 years have witnessed a sustained crisis in the
traditional family - divorces up, single-parent families
up, teens much more openly rebellious, the rise of the
'metrosexual' .
Why? Just as the Jews are not solely to blame for the
world's political problems, it is not fair to blame gays
for the virtual collapse of the family in the West or the
perceived castration of men. It is a result of the
long-term decline of western societies, the invasion of
the family by commercial media, with its questioning of
traditional values and its manipulation of sex in the
promotion of consumption. However, equally crucial have
been post-WWII liberal social reforms, including equal
rights for women and the legalization of homosexuality.
In claiming our rights, gays played an important role in
rebelling AGAINST the traditional family and the male/
female stereotypes. Unfortunately, what is replacing them
- serial parents, one-parent families, now gay families,
and the wimpy metrosexual - are poor substitutes. I am
the first to acknowledge that our society is in crisis,
just as is our world, and my fellow gays and my sometime
Jewish allies have a disproportionately large role in
this.
But again there are differences
While there were no pogroms of gays, I would suggest that
gays have taken more of a beating on a day-to-day basis,
even in this age of Political Correctness. In most of the
world, it is much more dangerous to be openly gay than
openly Jewish. And historically, despite occasional
outbreaks of anti-Jewish anger, Jews have traditionally
had much greater freedom. Compare the infamous Oscar
Wilde trial with that of Dreyfus - coincidentally at
about the same time. Dreyfus, an obscure officer, became
the cause celebre of Victor Hugo and other prominent
figures and was rehabilitated, while Wilde, the greatest
19th c playwright, died broken and abandoned. Ironically,
these historic trials were a kind of swan song for
civilization' s overt repression of Jews AND gays.
Of course, the barbarian holocausts of Hitler against
Jews AND gays were yet to come, but again, look at the
difference. The Jews (at least the Zionists and the 80+%
of Jews that actively support them) have used this
tragedy to reap billions of dollars in reparations and,
by creating their own racist state, inflict an equally
tragic fate on the Palestinians. No gays (or relatives)
received reparations for their suffering (let alone
communists or Roma). Gays have not used their new freedom
to inflict suffering on others claiming that it is
justified because of Hitler's holocaust. Perhaps gays are
just wimps, unlike the more aggressive, self-promoting
Jewish tribe. But then, perhaps being a wimp is not such
a bad thing.
Gays and Jews - cool
I have traditionally felt sympathy for Jews, knowing what
it feels like to be an outsider to society. My upbringing
taught me to respect education and economic success, much
like Jews do. My doctors, dentists, musician friends,
quite a few profs were all Jews - perhaps my strongest
influences growing up, though just as I never spoke about
being gay, they never spoke about being Jewish. It was
always assumed that we were basically assimilationists,
that being Jewish or gay was something secondary, spicy,
if you like. Something that made life interesting but
that was not essential.
But that seems to have changed over my lifetime (since
the '67 war?). Jews are now much more up front about
their Jewishness. In the US, it is now 'cool' to be
'Jewcy', as some young Jews flaunt on their t-shirts.
Israel has no small part to play in this. God knows, it
has been ITEM NUMBER ONE on news and in the deluge of
holocaust films and museums for decades now (since the
'67 war?). The once staunchly ant-racist assimilationist
Jews have disappeared or been drown out. Increasingly,
Jews are casting aside their quiet assimilationism,
promoting themselves as a race both in their host
countries and as supporters of Israel, their second or
even first loyalty (since the '67 war?).
Consider what it is like for a child growing up in
Israel, where little Ariel is taught that he is superior
to other races, especially the 'darkies' living in
excruciating poverty in concentration camps close by
because Ariel 's parents kicked them out of their homes.
Imagine growing up with a political role model like
Netanyahu or Sharon - bloodthirsty, cynical, corrupt,
soulless, lying but clever leaders. Imagine being brought
up by parents, BOTH of whom, otherwise traditional
mommies and daddies, have killed dozens of innocent,
defenseless Palestinians in cold blood. Imagine the
children in your country loathing the children a few
kilometers away, considering them animals to slaughter
when they grow up, with nuclear bombs in necessary. Brrr.
It's ice cold down in Dante's Inferno.
It is now 'cool' to be gay now, too. There are now many
people who identify themselves first and foremost as
gays, rather than as, say Canadians or socialists, though
being gay by itself means very little when it comes down
to it. Some have taken the 'battle' to another level,
demanding the right to
marry and adopt children. WHAT?! I always thought being
gay meant liberation FROM the nuclear family. Enough with
all this irony, PULLEASE!
Call me a social conservative if you like, but I don't
much like the idea of 'two daddies' or 'two mummies'.
It's a way of forcing complex issues of sexual identity
on children who just aren't ready or interested in such
things, and makes their own difficult process of growing
up more difficult than it already is. Children need to
grow up in fairly conventional arrangements where they
can love and learn from both male and female role models.
Yes ROLE models, so they can experience first-hand, while
their own sexual identities are forming, how 'standard'
adults relate. Being gay will always be the exception
that proves the rule. By all means, provide some
alternatives - collective child-rearing, day care. OK,
even the odd gay 'families' (God knows there are
thousands of children in dysfunctional hetero families
who would be much better off with 'two daddies'), but the
rule of thumb should be to provide a mainstream hetero
blueprint.
Gays and Jews have a common choice
I understand why some gays are so eager for these hetero
trappings: they WANT to assimilate, really! They want to
be accepted as upstanding, patriotic, even right-wing
citizens. They don't relish their (God-given?) special
status and want to paper it over, to take comfort in
their two-car garage and their Big Macs, their X-Files
and Calvin Klein. They like the commodity fetishism that
has replaced the straight-laced asceticism of
Christianity, with its suspicion of all sexuality and
indulgence.
As for this pathetic attempt by gays to totally
assimilate, count me out. I EMBRACE my role as outcast,
gadfly, the 'other', much like Jean Genet. 'Gay is good'
but in small amounts and on the fringe. It curdles the
milk of straight society if it becomes too in-your-face.
It is boring if it becomes
your raison d'etre. In small quantities, gays are great.
En masse, they are insufferable.
The same goes for Judaism. Assimilate OR remain an
outcast. But there's an added caveat with respect to the
Jews: you can't have your cake and eat it. You can be an
assimilationist, like the 'two mommy' gays, and blend
into goy society (much more successfully), or live in a
secular Palestine side-by-side with the original
population if you have a thing about the Bible, the
'Promised Land' etc (IF that's OK by the natives). OR you
can choose to stay a Cohen, a Jew, an outsider, staying
aloof, amassing economic, political and social power
(that certainly seems to be the historical record), and
taking the risk that goes along with this wherever you
happen to be born (with your basic rights protected, of
course). But take note: you can't at the same time
promote another, outcast country and call it your REAL
homeland. Trust the eternal outsiders to reinvent
themselves on a international level as a rogue state. If
there's a hell on Earth, it's got to be present-day
Judaicized America and Israel.
And, non-assimilationists, be prepared: as Shylock found
out to his dismay, your daughter may up and marry a goy,
and if you try to take your 'pound of flesh', you've got
to be prepared for a backlash of some kind. Hopefully not
a holocaust, but control of goy society by an alien tribe
is just not in the books. You should have learned at
least THAT much from history. Take it from a fellow
sufferer. As the Russians say 'The farther you go, the
quieter you should proceed."
The outsider
So why choose to stay an outsider at all then? I
suggested my own reasons as a gay. There is another very
good reason: It's already clear our present capitalist
nightmare is lurching towards an Armageddon of some kind
or another, whether it be nuclear or environmental.
PROGRESSIVE Jews and gays as natural outsiders have
traditionally played a vital revolutionary role with
respect to society, a role which is lost when a loudly
proclaimed pro-gay, pro-Jew agenda is promoted. There is
an old saying: 'I don't live to eat, I eat to live.' Well
'I don't live to be gay, but I am gay in order to be
alive.' Ditto, I should think, for Jews. I suspect that
this is the real reason that the post-WWII anti-communist
West seemed to change overnight from Jew-hating and
gay-bashing to Jew/gay-loving. It WANTED to assimilate
the gays and the Jews as a kind of protection against
radical social change. After all, the Russian revolution
and the Communist movement were inspired by Jews, and
homosexuals and Jews first gained freedom in Russia in
the 1920s.
From revolutionary to reactionary
Maybe THAT'S why I feel so angry about Jews today (and
sorry for the boring assimilationist gays) - I feel
betrayed. I learned Russian and socialism from a
wonderful old Polish Jew, who was married to an Irishman,
had no use for a racist Israel, and was generous and
open-hearted to a fault. For all intents and purposes an
assimilationist, she nonetheless nurtured her outsider
role in a nonracist way and was proud of her Jewish
heritage till she died at the age of 90. But Jews today
have largely lost this positive outsider role. They
invariably support Israel and in alliance with the
so-called neocons pursue unbridled self/ tribal-interest.
Progressive non-Zionist Jews are as rare as hen's teeth
(as, I fear, are progressive non-Zionist gays).
The post-WWII strategy to neutralize the revolutionary
outcasts - Jew and gay - worked! Jews (and to a lesser
extent gays) have become bedrocks of reaction. And,
because of the power that the Jewish lobby wields in the
West now, unless a Jew speaks out clearly against Israel,
s/he must now share responsibility for Israel's crimes.
The successful co-opting of the world's Jews by the
Zionists ensures that. (Thank God there is no gay
Israel.) On the other hand, a Jew who protests will not
experience the growing 'anti-Semitism' or rather
anti-Jewish sentiment. On the contrary s/he will be
treated as a courageous progressive, as indeed s/he is.
The Zionist-coopted Jews are betraying their God-inspired
role as catalyst for progress (the 'Chosen People', if
you must). They are misusing their freedom, not only to
their own, but to everyone's detriment. In the same vein,
quasi-assimilationist gays are also rejecting their
special spiritual role and misusing their new freedom to
indulge in silly hetero-aping and narcissistic commodity
fetishism. (Give me a job as shaman over a two-car garage
any day.)
This is not a call for a return to good ol'
straight-laced Christianity as conceived by
Bible-obsessed evangelicals. Institutionalized
Christianity in many ways deserves its present state of
collapse. Leaving aside its genocidal role in the spread
of imperialism over the past 5 centuries, it long ago
adopted the Judaic oppression of gays and promoted the
persecution of Jews themselves, until this reached a
nightmarish peak in the 13-14th cc, not to mention the
unspeakably brutal Crusades of the 11-12th cc against the
Muslims.
There are lots of benign alternatives to the nuclear
family, just as there are lots of benign alternatives to
a racist Israel. The Soviet Union, as an attempt to build
an alternative civilization, sadly just didn't make the
grade for a host of reasons. However, we haven't reached
the 'end of history' just yet. The good fight to try to
make 'heaven on Earth', to achieve a just society with
freedoms, alternatives - oh, and don't forget the spice -
goes on. But there is no room in society for racism and
vengeance, a lesson I hope the Jews (and their goy
sidekicks) learn soon (you don't have to teach this to
gays) before we are all burnt to a crisp in a US/
Israeli-inspired nuclear (or merely) environmental
holocaust.
***************
*(i) The gay writer CM
Forster: "If I had to chose between betraying my
country or a friend, I hope I would betray my
country." For Diaspora Jews, if it is a choice
between Israel and their host country, there is no
question which is more important.
*(ii) It is even argued that
Hitler merely took the Zionist racist agenda as set out
by Moses Hess and Theodor Herzl a few years earlier,
substituting German for Jew. Considering what the
Zionists have done since they have gained ascendancy
first in Israel and now in the US, this looks
uncomfortably close to the truth.
*(iii) Charles Bronfman, a
main sponsor of the $210 million "Birthright
Israel" project which attempts to deepen the
commitment of American Jews: "You can live a
perfectly decent life not being Jewish, but I think
you're losing a lot - losing the kind of feeling you have
when you know [that] throughout the world there are
people who somehow or other have the same kind of DNA
that you have." (Bronfman is co-chairman of the
Seagram company and brother of Edgar Bronfman, Sr.,
president of the World Jewish Congress.) Washington Post,
Jan. 17, 2000
*(iv) Some critics argue
that attacks against Jews are actually part of the
Zionist strategy to justify further repression of
Palestinians and to encourage Diaspora Jews to emigrate
to Israel. The 'shitty little country' reference is an
unfortunate slip by the now former French Ambassador to
the UK at a 'private' party.
Illustration by Niall McCormack http://www.niallmc.com/
MY STATEMENT
AS AN ARTIST,
Niall McCormack
The austere
stark style of my paintings is informed by surrealist and
minimalist movements. My work is a response to my take on
architectural structures and their surroundings and shows
an exploration of diverse architectural forms: monastic,
romanesque, classical and minimalist modern and the
institutionalised setting.
I am particularly interested in how people are influenced
and affected by these forms in both urban and rural
environments. As a young man, I was deeply affected by
the monastic environment in which i found myself placed.
This made a rich mystical impact on my life intermingled
with the feelings of silence and austerity which is and
was at that time integral to my young deaf identity and
my particular way of seeing things.
Since childhood I have experienced many disharmonious
things and the joy and pain that a diverse life brings.
These experiences inform my ongoing engagement and
fascination with the institutional setting and this
imagery continues to work on an unconscious and
subconscious level for me.
In conclusion, I feel my artistic responses to these
things in my life and work are positive, aesthetic and
evocative.
Niall McCormack
|