march 2005
The
second wave
New books, new groups
fuel smoldering resurgence
of 9/11 skeptics movement
By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net
It came as a big — and pleasant — surprise to
me. In a chance conversation with a complete stranger at
the car wash, I screwed up my courage and dared to say
it.
"You know ... our own government was behind
9/11!" I held my breath. My eyebrows scrunched up in
anticipation of some mindwashed backlash of preprogrammed
patriotic outrage.
The guy turned slowly and looked me squarely in the eye.
"I know," he said, his furrowed brow mirroring
all the painful pathos that has hogtied all the hearts in
America these past three years. I breathed a big sigh of
relief. And then I pushed the envelope.
"And you know ... all those people dead in Iraq
— thousands of Americans and a hundred thousand
Iraqis — all because of lies." The old guy
tugged on his frayed plaid cap and wheezed. "I
know," he repeated, shuffling his feet, his body
involuntarily twitching from the realization of his
long-suppressed acknowledgement.
As he left I handed him a copy of my booklet, "The
Day America Died," and said, "Here's a basic
overview of that terrible day." He took it, nodded
stiffly, furtively glanced around to see who might be
watching, clambered into into his clean car, and went on
his way.
Over the past few weeks, the same thing has happened at
the supermarket, in my yard, in the parking lot at the
local Wal-mart. I dare to ask the question. And I am
shocked to discover — totally contradicting what
people hear on television — that people know. People
already know!
Our government engineered 9/11 for its own perverse
political purposes. In their hearts, many people already
know it.
I see it in my e-mails, of course, have for a long time,
with 2,000 of my closest friends. They are the ones who
are always asking, "Now that we know, what we can
do?"
I have failed them miserably in my answers to that
question. I always respond rhetorically, philosophically.
"Stand securely in your own truth and be an example
to others," is about the best I can come up with.
"Try to spread the word." Or, "revolution
evolves one person at a time." Pretty lame,
nonspecific stuff.
But then I noticed my book orders were spiking. Ten
booklets here, 20 there, an occasional hundred for a
meeting that someone had scheduled. Then it began to dawn
on me. People were handing them out, trying to convince
others. A whole new group of people was turning on to the
real 9/11 story.
Finally, after years of brainwashed obedience to the
clumsy media lies, the tragedy-forced patriotism, the
false statements of our leaders were finally being
perceived. People finally were finally waking up. New
converts to the 9/11 skeptics movement were beginning the
long, painful journey to that horrific realization —
our leaders killed their own people merely for profit,
and now were killing thousands more, every day, all over
the planet, for the same evil purpose.
And people began calling me, telling me about their
meetings. I didn’t dare believe it was a second
wave. But the calls kept coming.
The first thought I had was that the second wave
shouldn’t make the same mistakes the first wave did.
The first wave failed. The perps, so far, have gotten
away with their evil deeds. In fact, one of the so-called
leaders of the first wave, Mike Ruppert, has declared the
9/11 issue dead. Good. He’s retired. We don’t
need him. He was the prime saboteur of the first wave,
ruining the first big 9/11 forum in San Francisco with
his oil company propaganda.
The second wave should know that peak oil has nothing to
do with 9/11. It’s a disinformational distraction.
Peak oil is a trend that may or may not be true. Most
honest people think it’s just another oil company
ruse to jack up prices. But even if it is a serious
social problem, it has nothing to do with 9/11, the crime
of the century, about which most of the public has been
told nothing but lies.
Our leaders lied about what happened. They refused to
hold an investigation. They destroyed the evidence. They
hid the videotapes. They blamed Muslims but didn’t
to this day produce a shred of evidence against them.
They deceived our own air defenses with bogus drills
designed to confuse everyone. They invented fantastic
cellphone calls. They met with terrorists and let
important witnesses slip out of the country. The list of
their deceptive maneuvers is nearly endless.
But there is one thing they couldn’t hide, and that
is the issue that the second wave, IMHO, should focus on.
Don’t be distracted by bells and whistles, by
airplanes shooting missiles or faux Islamicists in strip
clubs, don’t get bogged down by what did or
didn’t hit the Pentagon or trapped in endless
arguments about slow flying interceptors, gaps in the
NORAD coverage, or whether Flight 93 was shot down.
There is one issue, and one issue only. It is the issue
that will hang them.
The time the towers took to fall.
Jetliners striking building hundreds of feet in the air
could not possibly have dropped those towers in ten
seconds. Think about it. 47 robust steel columns anchored
in bedrock hundreds of feet below had to be demolished
simultaneously at the instant of collapse in order for
9/11 to happen as it did. And that is exactly what
happened.
I continue to sell plenty of my booklets because of its
simple narrative that takes people from accepting the
government’s version to realizing the official
version is a lie.
But now, newcomers to the 9/11 mystery have two even
better teaching tools to help them convince those who
still believe their government loves them, and would
never do anything to hurt them. And that it’s
patently clear that the WTC towers were brought down by
controlled demolition.
The first is an ingenious and thorough narrative sculpted
together by WING-TV guru Victor Thorn (and his trusty
sidekick Lisa Guliani) titled “9/11 on Trial: The
World Trade Center Collapse — Guilty.”
It’s written in the form of a trial transcript and
takes the reader through the strange, anomalous process
of the WTC collapse step-by-step, cleverly and
authoritatively weaving witness testimony culled from the
works of some of the finest investigators in the 9/11
skeptics movement, including Jim Hoffman, Eric Hufschmid,
Jerry Russell & Richard Stanley, Christopher Bollyn,
Ralph Omholt, Peter Meyer, Jeff King, Dave MacGowan, Jim
Marrs, and David Ray Griffin, among other diligent
soldiers in the battle to expose the government’s
lies.
I and many other 9/11 observers have been harping for a
long time that each of the Twin Towers collapsed in
roughly ten seconds, a physically impossible feat for a
structure knocked down by pressure from near the top. The
simple resistance of thousands of tons of steel and
concrete would make such a collapse a long, slow, and
incomplete were it possible at all to happen in the way
the government said it did, which it was not.
But the Thorn/Giulani book raises even more interesting
points, and even more impossible contradictions.
For instance, just prior to the first collapse, the top
of the South Tower tipped to 23 degrees, but then it
suddenly stopped its angular momentum, changed direction,
and fell straight down, just about the time many people
reported explosions at the bottom of the tower. The only
way the momentum of the falling top could have been
changed in mid-collapse was to blast away a portion of
EACH of the 47 core columns, causing the building to fall
uniformly into its own footprint.
How the Towers fell is impossible according to the
official story because the gravitational potential energy
of a skyscraper is nowhere near sufficient to destroy its
own frame.
“Given that the lower columns were radically thicker
steel, and obviously stronger, some of the columns should
have still been standing — in some significant
number.”
— Witness 8 (Omholt)
“For the WTC buildings to react the way the did,
literally thousands of super heavy-duty joints and weld
would have to ‘snap’ at precisely the same
instant.”
— Witness 8 (George Humphrey)
“In order for the floor to fall, hundreds of joints
has to break almost simultaneously on 236 exterior column
s and 47 core columns. FEMA does not bother to explain
how this could occur.”
— Witness 10 (Hufschmid)
If all the joints weren’t heated at the same rate,
the building would not fall uniformly.
Thorn’s patient narrative unveils all manner of
revealing information to use in further discussions. One
is the maximum temperature unprotected steel supports in
these fires if 680 degrees; the first critical threshold
in structural steel is 1,022 degrees.
These tests ultimately tell us that ...
“Fire did not weaken the WTC structure sufficiently
to cause the collapse of the towers.”
— Witness 11 (J. McMichael)
I won’t give away too much more of the narrative,
but just let me say THIS BOOK is a wonderful syllabus for
anyone trying to comprehend the complex ramifications of
the 9/11 tower collapses, perhaps the most accessible
roundup to date of the single piece of evidence that
should leave the American people demanding trials for
treason and mass murder for hundreds of its most powerful
leaders.
Why were those odd and powerful seismographic spikes
recorded moments BEFORE the towers fell? Why were pools
of molten steel still bubbling at the bases of the three
fallen towers ONE WEEK after 9/11? Is there any doubt
that all three buildings were brought down by controlled
demolitions? No.
This book, being a deftly weaved digest of the best 9/11
research out there, delivers the goods. It is
indispensable to anyone trying to get to the bottom of
the greatest crime in American history.
Simply Google WING-TV (I’ll write more about that
later) for more information and how to get it. It’s
only seven bucks. Hand them out to your friends.
Why is the second wave occuring? Because people are
realizing that 9/11 is the key to regaining our freedom,
to taking our country back from the cynical psychopaths
running the U.S. government who are implementing diverse
and subversive programs of mass murder all over the
world.
9/11 is the key. The American government is willing to
kill anyone so the bankers get their way. This book
demonstrates — very clearly — that our leaders
are guilty of treason and mass murder. That’s what
motivates the second wave. Now that the sadness has
waned, and the faux patriotic invective has begun to ring
hollow in the wake of dead and sick soldiers being
brought home from Iraq, more people are beginning to
question the nightmare America has become.
Another crucially important tool for the second wave,
among many, is another small, inexpensive book, titled
“Waking Up From Our Nightmare: The 9/11/01 Crimes in
New York City,” by Don Paul and Jim Hoffman. While
the Thorn/Guliani book is a relatively simple read for
laymen, the Paul/Hoffman book is for those who can digest
intricate technical information, and understand the 9/11
hoax in all its gory detail. Used as one of Thorn’s
sources, it has a much wider focus, revealing
photographs, meticulous footnotes and sells for only $10.
Most importantly, it reserves its primary focus for the
most critical piece of 9/11 evidence: the time the towers
took to fall. And it delves into the evidence in a
thorough and forthright way. It contains no wild
theories, only scientific fact, which of course proves
our own leaders murdered 3,000 of our own citizens, not
to mention all those other hundreds of thousands of
innocent victims around the world.
One of the many great nuggets of knowledge in this book
is how New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani explained to a
reporter that he was warned the first tower was going to
collapse although even the firefighters in the building
didn’t know that. Giuliani never mentioned who told
him.
Order it at http://www.wtc7.net/store/books/wakingup/
Now, at many of the meetings that are being held around
the country as interest in the 9/11 deception continues,
my little booklet “The Day America Died” is
being handed out to get people to take the first step.
Not to try to diminish my own sales, but I would
recommend these other two books be handed out and
discussed as well, because they furnish a simple way of
getting people on board this spontaneous attempt to try
to take our country away from the criminals who are
oppressing (and destroying) the world.
So far, I know of informal meetings utilizing my booklet
that have been held in the following states: Arizona,
California (3 — Burbank, San Diego, Sonora),
Connecticut, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas (2 — San Antonio
and Houston), Vermont, Washington, as well as in France
and New Zealand. I’m sure there are many others
using other materials. If you want to get hooked into
this, ask around, or ask me, and I’ll clue you in as
best I can.
One thing I can tell you to do is listen to what is
probably the last remaining bastion of actual free speech
in the United States, the crusading radio patriots on
shortwave and Internet broadcasts, principally on the
Genesis Radio Network (Jeff Rense and Alex Jones) and the
Republic Broadcasting System (John Stadtmiller and Jack
Blood). Yes, you sometimes have to put with up with
religious crazies on these networks, but if you pick your
shows carefully, there’s a wealth of information to
be gained.
And for new people coming into the 9/11 skeptics movement
for the first time, I would be remiss were I not to
mention two particular individuals who serve as examples
of exactly what is needed for this movement to succeed in
its goal.
People with clout.
You need to try and understand that most of the people
who have carried the load in battling to expose the
government’s hoax about 9/11 are essentially like
me, not affluent, not out to make money, and often living
hand to mouth while concentrating on doing something they
think is of critical importance to the future of the
human species. This group includes most of the people
mentioned above, but also thousands of others who are
only interested in overcoming the American media mindlock
and presenting truth in the cause of justice.
To mention them all would be impossible. But specific to
9/11, I would advise newcomers to check in periodically
with the work of Brian Salter
<http://www.questionsquestions.net/> and Dave
MacGowan <http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/> for
indispensible insights into the latest developments.
But two people WITH clout have not only served as an
examples of who we need to succeed in restoring truth and
justice to the American way of life, but have provided an
invaluable lift to a floundering 9/11 skeptics movement
that has been sabotaged by moles, distracted by
hare-brained theses, and diminished by goons who are only
after personal power.
These two courageous individuals are Jimmy Walter and
Karl Schwarz.
Walter is the heir to a construction fortune who has
already spent $4 million on print ads trying to bring the
9/11 hoax to the public’s attention. He has also
taken his lumps on mainstream TV trying to explain what
he’s doing (many of us have seen the Posner fiasco
on CNN, in which he was suppressed, ridiculed and
prevented from getting his message across). But he’s
still in there fighting, looking for new ways to crack
the public’s cement mind.
To see what he’s up to, go to
http://www.reopen911.org/ as especially read Webster
Tarpley’s chronicle “9-11 Synthetic
Terrorism” (right below the great tower explosion
photos on the left), which is every bit as good as the
books by Thorn and Hoffman mentioned above.
Schwarz is the nanotech CEO and Christian Republican who
has turned on the strawman Bush with several initiatives
to try to get the legal establishment in New York state
to act on convincing evidence, including much that has
not been produced elsewhere, that would send many of our
leaders to prison for a long time.
For a complete look at his interesting perspective on
9/11 (read all six parts for the full effect) and the
ingenious actions he has taken, go to
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/021205Schwarz/021205schwarz.html
If we had a few more of these establishment types who
were less concerned with their own bank accounts and more
committed to the welfare of their country and the world
we all live in, Bush and Cheney and their gay prostitute
newsmen would not be sitting in the White House right
now, they’d be in Guantanamo in orange jumpsuits
awaiting trial on the capital charges of treason, mass
murder and various other crimes against humanity.
We especially need people of means to buy the three books
mentioned above in quantity and hand them out to a large
number of people. There are millions of Americans who are
waiting to get this information, and suffer the painful
epiphany that this world they have allowed to be created
by their own acquiescence and indifference ultimately
plans on exploiting and killing them.
So, second wavers, I think the two books and 27 links in
this piece will get you off to a good start. Thank you
for your sudden awakening. Your efforts are sorely
needed.
Just like that guy at the car wash, tell people you know
what the real story about 9/11 actually is. And get them
to tell others.
I don’t think I have to tell you at this point that
this is the battle for our future, the battle for
everything, and the entire strength of the U.S.
government and all the prostituted, mind-controlling mass
media is arrayed against us.
And that being said, we have no choice but to win. For
our children. And their children. Hell, do it for
yourself, because you and I and everybody else are
definitely at risk to lose everything we love. Carry on.
John Kaminski’s Internet essays can be
seen on hundreds of websites around the world. They have
been collected into two anthologies, the latest of which
is titled “The Perfect Enemy,” about how the
Zionist-controlled U.S. government created the terrorist
group knowns as al-Qaeda. His booklet “The Day
America Died: Why You Shouldn’t Believe the Officlal
Story of What Happened on September 11, 2001” has
sold about 5,000 copies and continues to sell well. For
more information go to http://www.johnkaminski.com/
Background picture of military installation for G.W.Bush
inauguration as Resident of the White House.
9-11: Holes in the RadarFrank Levi and Team 8+ (Feb 2005) They cunningly exploited vulnerabilities in the radar that only the US Military and the FAA should have been aware of. US Military please note: this text is not intended to offend the good people in the US Military. The implications of the article are that 9-11 was staged by elements of the US Government/Military but it is very unlikely that it involved the normal people in the military whose only intention is to protect their country. Since 9-11, many people have wondered how it was possible that the four hijacked planes on 9-11 were able to cause such confusion and chaos without any significant response from America's air defences (NORAD)? Even more amazing is the fact that a hijacked plane was able to both penetrate and attack within the protected air space around Washington DC. It is already well established that the planners of 9-11 were aware of and possibly taking advantage of the military exercises and terror drills taking place on and around that day. (See War Games and Terror Drills under additional reading) What we have discovered is that whoever planned and implemented 9-11 must have had detailed knowledge of both the NORAD and FAA radar coverage. They cunningly exploited vulnerabilities in the radar that only the US Military and the FAA should have been aware of. The 9-11 commission only skimmed the surface of these issues, using them as a means to draw blame away from the FAA and NORAD. Another important question is why the hijackers took such long illogical routes to get to their targets. Why, for example, was Flight 93 not crashed into the World Trade Centre, which was in sight of the airport? Analysis of the flight paths reveals the possibility that the planes were switched for substitute "drone" planes, operated by remote control and loaded with explosives to cause maximum damage. Although this is somewhat speculative, it is important to point out the anomalies in the flight paths that might lead us to consider this scenario. If you are unfamiliar with "plane-swapping" and "remote controlled plane" theories, please refer to Appendix C (Operation Northwoods and Remote Controlled Planes) Before reading on, you may wish to review the appendices for an explanation of technical terms and some notes on the graphical techniques used throughout this piece. It is also well worth reading the following article from the Washington Post. They explain in detail about why Flight 77 disappeared from the radar screen, leading the air traffic controller to believe that this flight had crashed. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node&contentId=A32597-2001Nov2 Sources showing radar sites and coverage (Click thumbnails for a larger image)
Sources of Flight Path data
The Scenario This map shows the 9-11 flight paths copied onto part of the FAA radar map (see above). The orange areas are FAA primary radar coverage, the maroon areas are NORAD radar (also used by FAA). The areas with no primary radar coverage are emphasised in white. The "hijackers" clearly knew where the vulnerabilities in the radar system were. How?
Unless otherwise specified, the times and events in this sequence are taken from the 9-11 Commission Report or directly from the Flight Explorer/ Flytecomm data.
Notice the precision timing involved. We frequently see two or more events happening at the same time, like a magician distracting the audience.
The Witness
http://www.timesreporter.com/archive/printable.php?ID=1490 Did Bolivar man spot Flight 93? By RENEE BROWN, T-R Staff
Writer Tim Hacquard, who lives in the Hunter’s Green allotment off county Rd. 92, said he was watching the television coverage of the terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington D.C. and stepped outside. “I witnessed a large plane that seemed to be flying low, very loud and not level,” Hacquard said. “I didn’t think there were supposed to be any planes in the air and I couldn’t understand why this plane was flying. “There is not a plane in sight and then there’s a big old plane over my house. On an average day you don’t see those types of planes near Bolivar. “If it’s a large plane, you can’t hear it or make it out because it’s too high. If it’s a normal plane, it would have stayed at a local airport.” According to aviation officials, United Airlines Flight 93 was a Boeing 757 that left Newark, N.J., at 8:01 a.m. en route to San Francisco. It crashed about 10 a.m. southeast of Pittsburgh, presumably killing all 45 aboard. Flight 93 was the fourth plane to crash Tuesday. “Now I am wondering if this was the plane,” Hacquard said. He said he has some experience with planes, having served in the Air Force – but not as a pilot - for several years. “It was way too low for that size plane,” he continued. “I was scratching my head. It wasn’t level and was flying somewhat erratic. “I was thinking maybe it was a plane that had been directed to land, but then I found out a plane crashed in Pennsylvania and I saw the flight plan on the news. How far south did he come?” Hacquard admitted he didn’t look at his watch to check the time, but he said he watched the large, commercial jet for 15 to 20 seconds. “I just couldn’t tell if it was a United plane,” he said. “I was thinking, why would it be over Bolivar, why would it be in Ohio? Someone else had to see that plane.” An FBI spokesperson in Washington D.C. said Wednesday she could not confirm or deny what Hacquard saw. “I have no specific information on specific flight patterns,” she said. However Fred Krum, director of aviation at Akron-Canton Regional Airport, acknowledged that the plane could have been close to the area at that time but he doesn’t think it was Flight 93 that Hacquard saw since “it would have been fairly high at that time.” Another representative of the airport said Hacquard may have seen a military plane or a commercial plane ordered to land at the nearest airport. Hacquard said the plane seemed to be flying away from the Akron-Canton airport, heading in a more easterly direction. He now also wonders whether the plane was being tracked by government officials. What happened to the passengers? Now the tricky part, if plane swapping took place, what happened to the real planes and the passengers? Unfortunately this is where we currently have to resort to educated speculation. In Operation Northwoods we saw the original "plane swapping" scenario. In this case, the military planners at the pentagon were confident that they could fabricate passengers by creating non-existent IDs for the people on the plane. They were also noticeably confident that no-one would blow the whistle. However, you can be sure that the 9-11 passengers are not on a desert island somewhere. Perhaps a number of planes were shot down that day. This is where you get "layers within layers" of the cover-up. Picture this fictional officer speaking: "Listen guys, we accidentally shot down another plane that was conducting an emergency drill today. What really hit the North Tower was a jet that the hijackers chartered from Schenectady County Airport. You understand that the public don't need to know about this, right?" There are many other possibilities, perhaps the passengers were killed before the plane landed at some remote location. Conclusions and Summary These are absolute facts that cannot be ignored:
Question 1: How did the "hijackers" know exactly where these huge breaches in air defence were located? Question 2: Why go to all that trouble when you can take off from nearby airports (Dulles/Newark), hijack the plane and crash it straight away? Now, to view additional evidence of plane swapping and other anomalies, read a detailed analysis of: Flight 175 (COMING SOON) Flight 93 (COMING SOON) Appendix A: Technical Information What are Primary and Secondary Radar? What is a transponder? Read a detailed technical explanation A primary radar site simply detects the location of a plane. Air traffic control systems can calculate the direction and speed by measuring its movement over time. Commercial flights (and most others) use a device called a transponder that relays back detailed information about the flight when it detects a radar sweep. The transponder provides the controllers with additional information such as altitude and flight number. If the transponder is switched off, the flight effectively becomes an unidentified blip on the radar, although ATC can place a data tag (or block) on the blip for easier identification. How do Flight Trackers work? Microsoft provide a simple explanation:
Simply put, the radar data received by Air Traffic Control can be seen in a slightly more visually pleasing format on a flight tracker. Appendix B: Graphical techniques Macromedia Fireworks was used to convert flight path graphics into transparent gif format. All background colours were changed to transparent leaving only the state boundaries and plane icons as opaque. These transparent gifs can then be pasted as a new layer onto another map. The transparent layer is stretched, rotated and skewed as necessary to align the state boundaries. This gives a very accurate representation of a flight path on top of an alternative backdrop. Appendix C: Operation Northwoods and Remote Controlled Planes Operation Northwoods is a document discovered through the Freedom of Information Act which proved conclusively that high ranking members of the US military have planned in the past to use fake terror attacks to justify war. This particular plan was to justify an invasion of Cuba by carrying out numerous acts of violence and trickery. A full scanned copy of Operation Northwoods can be seen at: http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm The matter-of-fact way in which this memo is presented is quite shocking. "We could blow up a ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba" "We could develop a communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities or even in Washington". For the purpose of this article we will be focusing on one particular section: http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm This section deals with a mock shoot-down of a passenger plane with the intention of blaming Cuba. The basic points follow:
A few other points to note:
Modifying planes to be flown by remote control is not a new idea. Read about Operation Aphrodite which goes right back to WWII. NASA have also test-crashed remotely controlled passenger planes Appendix D: The BTS data http://www.bts.gov/ is the website for the "Bureau of Traffic Statistics". There is a searchable database which shows, for example, the departure times of all major passenger planes in USA. You will see listed below the conflicts between the official story and the data on this site. 7: 59 Flight 11 officially takes off from
Logan 15.8:20 Flight 77 officially takes off from
Dulles Further Reading Some very interesting reading about radar and Air Traffic Control by Tom Lusch. http://home.columbus.rr.com/lusch/rtudslide01.html This will give you a better understanding of why Flight 77 disappeared from the radar screen. War Games and Terror Drills Here are some sample articles on this subject The lost "terror drill"? Pt.11 (A) (Nico Haupt) The lost terror drill- Pt.11 B Additional notes by Nico Haupt Michael Kane: "9/11 War Games – No Coincidence" Wargames Were Cover For the Operational Execution of 9/11 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/060704_tripod_fema.html
|
