When I finish the following words, Arafat will probably
no longer be of this world. I knew the man since 1970.
Since then I met him on countless occasions(1). I can say he was not only my
leader but also a friend. He was then married to
Palestine and died married to Palestine. Palestine is a
beautiful woman with a just cause. He was proud of her
and he gave her all he had, the best way he could. He
slaved for her all his life and he died at her service.
To the many people of this Palestine he became the
tireless symbol of their just struggle and cause. For
Palestine he traveled the four corners of the earth
singing her song. From Beijing, Moscow, Paris and
Washington he stated clear and loud his love for
Palestine. He used to say "I would build my home and
my state even if it were on one square meter in this
beloved Palestine. From that square meter I will continue
the struggle for its liberation."
In his way, for Palestine, he played a dangerous game,
playing on the contradictions of corrupt Arab governments
who chased him from one region to another, who put him in
jail and killed his friends and followers. Those regimes
until this very moment use Palestine as lip service so
they can survive the anger of their people. While doing
this, those regimes sunk deep and became slaves to their
masters who are the enemies of Palestine. Arafat didn't
join them; he fought them as best he could and used them
as best as he could to survive.
Arafat met his worst enemies face to face. He didn't
clinch. All their powers didn't make him clinch and he
continued his fight for Palestine. He succeeded not only
to become the symbol of his people but also to put foot
in Palestine. This was his dream and he achieved it. Even
the mightiest power of his foes didn't succeed in killing
him. He died of unknown sickness to which his enemies
have contributed. They believe his death will leave the
road to Palestine, and their evil designs for Palestine,
open. They are wrong. They don't understand Arafat's
people and their ways. They never will succeed because
Arafat planted the seeds of liberation into the
Palestinian mind. He was the symbol of his people and the
obstacle to his enemies. He is not alone now; he is
millions of people, not only in Palestine but also all
over the world. Many so-called intellectuals of this
world fell into his enemy's propaganda. What a shame!
They didn't realize that he is part of the Palestinian
soil and soul. He was born from the ashes of Palestine,
of this land and he will become again part of the ashes
of the same Palestine. He incarnated the hopes, the
laughter, the sadness, the suffering of his land and his
people. He will live forever in their memory and his
lessons and love will never be forgotten.
Many leaders come and go, but none of them was or ever
will be like Arafat. He could make laughter, he could
cry, swear and accept his views in just few minutes of
talk. Goodbye friend, for I know we shall meet soon and
keep the watch over the beautiful bride with the name of
Palestine.
(1) The first meeting took
place in 1971; we met at least four times a year in
Beirut, Damascus, Algeria and the last one in 2002 in
Palestine.
Rezeq Faraj
Death of a
Martyr
By
Israel Shamir
The great leader of Palestine,
Yasser Arafat, is dead. This unique man, whose withered
body was interned on the Eve of Eid el Fitr in a coffin
with the holy soil of Jerusalem in the midst of his
ruined fortress, was a symbol of struggle for Palestinian
dignity. He will be forever remembered as a young warrior
who broke the teeth of Jewish arrogance in the battle of
Karameh, in 1968, when his fedayyin resisted the
irresistible force of Israel and caused its first ever
defeat. He will be remembered as a friend of Leila Haled,
the man with a gun who blew up enemy airplanes and spoke
at the UN. He will be listed among other warrior-saints
of the century next to Che Guevara and Chapaev. He will
be remembered also for his last stand, for the last three
dreadful years he had spent in besieged Mukata as Sumud
personified, as example of unconditional clinging of a
native man to his soil.
He did not ran away when Israel
bombed and strafed Mukata, he did not ran away when the
Jews discussed daily how should they kill him, he did not
ran away during the hard years of Intifada he
stayed with his people to the bitter end. Eventually he
was granted glorious martyrdom as one of thousands
Palestinians martyred in the bloody war, together with
Abdelkader el Husseini, Sheikh Ahmad Yassin and other
leaders and warriors.
Even his errors were errors of a
good man. He believed that the enemy will abide by an
agreement, he believed that the superpower will enforce
the treaty they guaranteed, he believed in a possibility
of carving out two states in his beloved Palestine. He
submitted to endless humiliations, agreed to endless
concessions to the insatiable adversary, but he never
surrendered the Noble Sanctuary of Haram al Sharif, never
gave up the right of return of his people to Jaffa and
Haifa.
His death of a martyr is also
death of the Two-states-solution, of a
Palestinian-state-alongside-Jewish-state mantra. Now we
should concentrate our efforts in the only possible
direction creation of one democratic state for all
in the whole of the Holy Land from the River to the
Sea. We call for immediate release of Marwan
Barghouthi from the Israeli captivity, together with
thousands other prisoners-of-war. We call for general
elections with participation of all inhabitants of
historic Palestine, native Palestinians and Ashkenazi,
Oriental and Russian immigrants, on basis of full
equality. We call to inter the mortal remains of Arafat
the Martyr in al Aqsa Mosque, next to Abdelkader al
Husseini, as a guardian of the Holy Mountain. We shall
redeem you, Arafat!
***
My Russian friend and a great
modern writer Alexander Prochanov wrote these ringing
lines about the great fallen leader a few years ago, when
the Intifada just began. They are still suitable today:
Arafat as the Leader of Palestinians and of
Russians
By Alexander Prochanov,
Zavtra weekly No: 42(359) Date: 17-10-2000
The great nations whose haughty
stalk shook the earth, who changed the world, revolted,
populated new continents, conceived new religions, now
are staring drowsily at their shepherds, who brought them
into the sty of the new world order, drip dross from a
table of America into their manger, pour the Circes
potion of IMF, titillate them by a distant sight of the
synthetic heifer of the American dream. A nation that
dares to kick and pull the chain is flogged by electronic
scourges of CNN; its skin pierced by sharp Tomahawks. The
Russians forgot Pushkins poems and Stalins
victories; Latin America does not recollect Bolivar,
Sandino and Che Guevara.
But in one spot, a space ray
burned through the dead encapsulating shell of the
planet. This space ray, as Gods finger, points to
the people of Palestine. Wherever the ray reaches the
earth, wherever it shines over Gaza, Jerusalem and
Hebron, History Alive is re-created before our eyes. As
in the days of the prophets, the people of the Holy Land
pray, shoot, bleed, sing the songs of struggle, face the
Jewish tanks, tear off their steely caterpillars with
bare hands, stops up with their bodies the flaming gun
mouths, demonstrate to the fuzzy emasculated world the
meaning of words Freedom, Country, God.
Israel is doomed. She is
disgusting to the Arabs, French, Englishmen, even to
herself. Red- hot Intifada is the fiery river, in which
another myth of the 20th century melts and
sinks to the bottom the Zionist idea. According to
designs of Herzl and Zhabotinsky, a small geopolitical
monstrosity was created on the Arab lands. They have
imposed on America and Germany the annual tribute of five
billions dollars. They pour napalm on the mosques and
transform the whole nations into homeless survivors and
refugees. They brainwash the whole world with their
ashes of Auschwitz.
On the place of Israel, the Arabs
will plant many fig trees and Lebanese cedars; they will
create a National Park called The Jewish National Home:
it will be the home of the large and pretty
Hebrew-speaking parrot.
Yasser Arafat is the last national
leader of the turn-of-the-millennium. The Great
Palestinian was reared by his people professing the faith
of freedom; he erased the division between Sacred and
Mundane together with distinction between Life and Death.
God came to His people incarnated as the wise, fearless,
tireless, incorruptible leader. He closes eyes to the
fallen fedai, embraces the orphan, wipes tears of widow,
departs from burning Beirut with his warriors, enters the
Beasts lair in Camp David, reads the incinerated
Koran in Sabra and Shatila, kisses the hot earth of his
native Palestine, walks with his olive branch and the
Kalashnikov gun into the immortality of history.
Tell me, the branch of
Palestine: where did you grow, where you have
blossomed... - asked the poet. It would reply:
I grew in the Garden of Eden of our Lord the God.
Of my strong wood, the handgrip and the stock of the
machinegun are made. My fiery leaves, like the drops of a
Molotov cocktail, fly on the armor of the Israeli tanks.
My blossom decorates the bullet-perforated banner of PLO.
My fruits are sweet for the heroes and martyrs, sweet as
Freedom... "
The Passion of Arafat
Gilad Atzmon
In the last ten days of his life the world held its
breath following what appeared to be an everlasting
battle between a giant freedom fighter and the angel of
death. Many of us were following the news with care, many
of us were praying for the president's recovery.
Apparently, not all of us: we also had a chance to see
some necrophiliac Israeli ministers who would not
let go, for them this was an opportunity to entertain
themselves with fatality, an opportunity not to be
missed. They tried to convince us for the last time that
Arafat was a terrorist, that the notion of him being
buried in Jerusalem amongst Jewish Kings was
inconceivable. These Israelis leaders insisted on
telling us that this great man was an enemy
of peace. But as it seems, their viciousness
didnt prevail.
By now the world is accustomed to Israeli politicians and
their utter lack of manners, not to mention a complete
absence of empathic qualities. And yet, Jewish ministers
and the Israeli media were dismayed to discover that once
again, Jewish sadism had been defeated, if anything it
was found to be counter effective. With worldwide
extensive coverage on all news networks, Arafat was
buried today as an admired world-class leader. Arafat is
probably the last popular peoples
leader. A man of the people, who failed to become
an American puppet or even an autocrat bureaucrat.
For three years, the old man was encircled in his
bombarded compound, occasionally his life was put at a
severe risk; the Muqata, the building in which he spent
his final year, was torn apart and a threat of collapse
was imminent for more than two years. In spite of his
age, without electricity or running water, in spite of
daily humiliation by the people who colonised his land,
the man didnt surrender. And yet the Israelis never
stopped, when they didnt bomb him they wanted to
cleanse him. But the man did not give up. Presenting his
people with the greatest form of mighty dignity, he
encouraged them to resist and they did.
It was shocking to find out that the Israeli politicians
and media outlets were foolish enough to bully the dying
man. How blind can you be to the most basic sense of
humanity? The old labour Zionists were as sadistic as
their right wing successors but at least they were fully
engaged in disguising their real motives. They always at
least pretended to be peace lovers. It now appears
that the current leading Israelis are far more
genuine. Much like their ancient biblical
ancestors, they went for the most banal vulgar populist
choice; they provided their crowd with the most
bloody message of vengeance. Israeli identity is obsessed
with the search for the notion of ultimate revenge. The
sensation of coming down on their defenceless foes like a
ton of bricks makes them feel very pleased with
themselves. This rather awkward philosophy matured into
the Israeli official political and military strategy. The
elected Israeli government is there merely to provide the
Israelis with Palestinian blood. The Israeli government
have very little claim for fame on any other front,
neither in economy nor in social security, nor indeed in
personal security. They specialise in providing the
Israeli public with a high Palestinian death rate. In
tactical terms they define it as power of
deterrence but in practice it is
better articulated as sheer bloodthirstiness.
Very much like their biblical ancestors, the Israelis
like to see their enemy beaten to death,whether it is an
old dying Arafat or a family annihilated by a gun ship in
Gaza. As terrifying as it sounds, the pain of others
makes the Israelis cheerful. This is the only explanation
for the murderous activities enacted by the Israeli army
in occupied territories. This is the only explanation for
them bullying the dying Arafat even when it was clear
that he was on his last legs. The concept of compassion
is completely foreign to them.
It now appears that the emancipation of the Jewish people
that led to the birth of Zionism: a racist, colonialist
and nationalist state, is now evolving into its very last
phase: a sadistic manifestation. Israel is engaged in the
daily bullying of the Palestinian people. When bullying
gets boring, they go for the kill; when killing gets
boring, they humiliate the dying Arafat. The Israelis
enjoy their overwhelming power. At the end of the day, it
must be quite good fun to threaten the entire region with
your colossal
nuclear destructive power.
But then, it is not entirely surprising that the Western
world and especially the Europeans are uneasy with the
latest manifestation of Zionism. They stand and stare at
current events with a sense of familiarity. For
Westerners, the passion of Arafat and the via-delerosa of
the Palestinian people isnt a revelation, it is
merely a repetition. A repetition of the birth of the
entire Western ethos, an ethos that is based upon the
denunciation of sadism and the endorsement of empathy.
Israel is going the other way, it is the narcissistic
embodiment of any possible inhuman sense. It is the
celebration of cruelty. History teaches us that when
sadistic narcissism reveals its face, the end should be
anticipated. Israel's days are numbered; it is just a
question of time before they turn against themselves.
http://www.gilad.co.uk
AFTER THE DEATH OF A PARTNER
GUSH SHALOM - pob 3322, Tel-Aviv 61033 www.gush-shalom.org/
November 11. Three months ago, in the beginning of
August, a delegation of Israeli Gush Shalom activists
visited Yasser Arafat at the Presidential Compound in
Ramallah, half-ruined in repeated raids by the Israeli
armed forces.
We have maintained this dialogue for over two decades, in
changing circumstances. There was the time before Oslo,
when meeting Arafat (or any PLO official) was illegal
under Israeli law and could carry a maximum of three
years' imprisonment. Then a sharp shift to the days of
the flourishing peace process, when meetings with the
Palestinian President had become a commonplace in the
Israeli mainstream and in his waiting room one could
frequently encounter senior Israeli government officials.
And from there, again to times of bloodshed and soaring
hatred, when Sharon and Bush (with the voluntary help of
numerous columnists and politicians) were eminently
successful in depicting Arafat as a terrible monster -
and meeting him became once again a highly controversial
and taboo-breaking act, sometimes involving physical
danger at times when government ministers spoke seriously
of sending commandos in, to capture or kill Arafat.
By keeping contact with and even acting on occasion as
human shield for the man venerated by millions of
Palestinians as their leader and the father of their
nation, we felt that we were serving the long term
interests of Israel. And whatever the outside
circumstances, inside the meeting room Arafat
was always the affable, gracious and attentive host, with
the old-fashioned gallantry of handkissing women.
The meeting in August this year was not an exception.
Arafat seemed strong and vigorous when we discussed the
situation in the Gaza Strip (at that time afflicted by a
combination of an extensive invasion by the Israeli army
and internal strife between Palestinian factions). We
came out with a clear message from Arafat: a call upon
Sharon to resume the peace negotiations broken off by
Barak in 2001, as well as to facilitate the holding of
new, internationally-supervised elections for the
Palestinian institutions. Arafat himself was quite ready
to face in the ballot box any contestant for the
presidency. For the longer range, Arafat had set out the
vision of a Benelux- type confederation beween Israel,
Palestine and Jordan, and recalled in vivid detail a
discussion on the subject which he had with Prime
Minister Rabin and King Hussein.
There was nothing to indicate that this meeting would be
the last. If he already felt the symptoms of whatever
killed him, he concealed them well - from us and
from others who met him at the time. But then, Arafat
just did not have the option available to an ordinary
75-year old: to declare himself ill and go to seek
the best of medical attention. We will never know if he
could have been saved, had he gone to France earlier. But
even if completely cured, Sharon would surely not have
let him come back, and he would have lived out his
remaining days in exile. For Arafat, that was an
unacceptable price. He could only carry on with his daily
routine - a paradoxical mixture of being head of state
and being a closely-guarded prisoner, with the
accumulated strain of both roles - until the final
collapse.
The Paris hospital refused to divulge details of the
exact cause of Arafat's death, citing
"privacy". Yet he had had precious little
privacy in these two final weeks. His dying, like his
life, was conducted in the spotlight of publicity, drama
and high tragedy mixing with elements of farce and
burlesque, when Suha Arafat started an unseemly squabble
with senior Palestinian officials - and all too many
Israeli politicians and commentators expressing a
disgusting glee and hope for the death of an old ill
man.
Two busloads of Israelis, from Tel-Aviv and Jerusalem,
will go to the funeral in Ramallah at the
initiative of Gush Shalom - to share in the Palestinians'
mourning for the Father of their Nation and pay the final
respect to Israel's enemy who could have been our partner
in building up a peaceful future. We will also mourn the
thousands of Israelis and Palestinians who died - and
will die - because that chance to make Arafat into
Israel's partner was allowed to slip away (or rather, was
deliberately smashed and destroyed).
And now - what? For all that he had conducted a kind of
personal vendetta with Arafat, Sharon may not be entirely
happy with the Palestinian leader's passing - which makes
much less plausible the claim that Israel has "no
partner". Now, quite a few mainstream politicians
are calling for the withdrawal from Gaza to be
transformed from a unilateral Israeli measure into a
bilateral agreement, the beginning of an overall end of
the occupation also on the West Bank. And on the extreme
right, the call is rather facetiously made "to halt
withdrawal from Gaza while watching developments among
the Palestinians". For his part, Sharon is already
preparing to prove that even with "Arafat the
monster" gone, Israel still has "no
partner".
Meanwhile, the Palestinians confounded the pundits'
predictions of "a bloody succession struggle"
by a smooth and orderly passing on and division of
Arafat's powers among a provisional collective
leadership. But Abu Mazen, Abu Ala and the other new
leaders have little of the charisma and public standing
which Arafat had. Even if hailed in the Western media as
"moderates" and "pragmatists",
Abu Mazen and Abu Ala will be much less able than Arafat
to confront radical militias head-on or make
any concessions on for example the
implementation of the Right of Return. And some of the
leaders who do have a charisma and public standing
remotely comparable to Arafat's - such as Marwan Barguthi
- are now incarcerated in Israeli prisons, from which
Sharon shows no inclination to release them.
The key to the situation, in the crucial period
immediately ahead, may lie in the article of Palestinian
law which mandates new general elections within sixty
days of the president's death. Obviously, new elections
are vitally necessary in order for any new Palestinian
leadership to truly have a legitimacy and
popular mandate - and having such a leadership is a vital
Israeli need just as much as it is a Palestinian need.
But free elections are hardly compatible with an ongoing
harsh occupation and daily fighting: free elections
cannot take place when any Palestinian voter or candidate
can at any moment be "eliminated" by a missile
from an Israeli helicopter gunboat or hauled off in the
middle of the night for the tender mercies of the Israeli
Security Service interrogators. In effect, free elections
require a comprehensive cease-fire and an effective
reversal of Israel's re-occupation of the West bank
cities, imposed since April 2002.
Sharon, clearly, has not the least inclination in this
direction. And it also seems too much to hope
that George W. Bush will start taking seriously his
own pronouncements about "the need for a functioning
Palestinian democracy"...
Adam Keller
Gush Shalom spokesperson
+972-3-5565804 /
+972-50-6709603
Boycott List of Settlement Products (newly updated)
Hebrew / òáøéú
http://gush-shalom.org/Boycott/boycheb.htm
English
http://gush-shalom.org/Boycott/boyceng.htm
1. Liste des personnalités qui
ont participé aux funérailles du Président Yasser
Arafat (Le Caire, vendredi 12 novembre 2004)
- Afghanistan : Hedayat Amin Arsala,
vice-président
- Afrique du Sud : Thabo Mbeki, président
- Algérie : Abdelaziz Bouteflika, président
- Allemagne : Joschka Fischer, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Arabie saoudite : Abdallah ben Abdel Aziz, prince
héritier
- Bangladesh : Lajuddin Ahmed, président
- Bosnie : Adnan Terzic, Premier ministre
- Brésil : José Dirceu, chef de cabinet du président
Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, numéro deux du gouvernement
- Canada : Pierre Pettigrew, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Chine : Hui Liangyu, vice-Premier ministre
- Chypre : Vassos Lyssaridès, ancien président du
Parlement
- Croatie : Miomir Zuzul, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Danemark : Per Stig Moeller, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Djibouti : Ismaïl Omar Guelleh, président
- Estonie : Priit Kolbre, secrétaire général du
ministère des Affaires étrangères
- Etats-Unis : Williams Burns, secrétaire d'Etat adjoint
chargé du PO
- Espagne : Miguel Angel Moratinos, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Finlande : Erkki Tuomioja, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- France : Michel Barnier, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Grèce : Pétros Molyviatis, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Italie : Alfredo Mantica, sous-secrétaire aux Affaires
étrangères, le président du Sénat, Marcello Pera, et
le ministre de l'Agriculture, Gianni Alemanno
- Inde : Natwar Singh, ministre des Affaires étrangères
- Indonésie : Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, président
- Iran : Kamal Kharazi, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Irlande : Dermot Ahern, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Japon : Mme Yoriko Kawaguchi, conseiller spécial du
Premier ministre Junichiro Koizumi et ex-ministre des
Affaires étrangères
- Jordanie : le roi Abdallah II
- Koweït : Ahmed al-Fahd al-Sabah, ministre de
l'Economie
- Lettonie : Andris Vilcans, ambassadeur en Egypte
- Liban : Emile Lahoud, président, Nabih Berri,
président du Parlement, Omar Karamé, Premier ministre,
Mahmoud Hammoud, ministre des Affaires étrangères
- Lituanie : Antanas Valionis, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Malaisie : Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Premier ministre
- Maroc : Moulay Rachid, prince héritier
- Mauritanie : Sghaïr Ould M'Bareck, Premier ministre,
Mohamed Vall Ould Bellal, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Nigéria : Aminu Bello Masari, président du parlement
- Norvège : Jan Petersen, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Oman : Youssef ben Alaoui ben Abadallah, ministre des
Affaires étrangères
- ONU : Terje Roed-Larsen, représentant spécial de Kofi
Annan au PO
- Pays-Bas : Ben Bot, ministre des Affaires étrangères
- Pologne : Login Pastusiak, président du Sénat
- Portugal : Antonio Monteiro, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Qatar : cheikh Hamad ben Jassem ben Jabr Al-Thani,
ministre des Affaires étrangères
- République tchèque : Cyril Svoboda, ministre des
Affaires étrangères
- Roumanie : Simona Miculescu, conseillère du président
Ion Iliescu
- Royaume-Uni : Jack Straw, secrétaire au Foreign Office
- Russie : Boris Gryzlov, président de la Douma (chambre
basse du Parlement), Alexandre Saltanov, vice-ministre
des Affaires étrangères, Evgueni Primakov, ancien
ministre des A.E
- Sénégal : Abdoulaye Wade, président
- Serbie-Monténégro : Predrag Boskovic, adjoint du
ministre des Affaires étrangères
- Slovaquie : Eduard Kukan, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Somalie : Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed, président
- Soudan : Omar al-Béchir, président
- Sri Lanka : Mahinda Rajapakse, Premier ministre
- Suède : Goeran Persson, Premier ministre
- Suisse : Mme Micheline Calmy-Rey, ministre des Affaires
étrangères
- Syrie : Bachar al-Assad, président
- Tunisie : Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, président
- Turquie : Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Premier ministre,
Abdullah Gul, ministre des Affaires étrangères
- Union africaine : Alpha Oumar Konaré, président de la
commission de l'UA
- Union européenne : Ben Bot, ministre néerlandais des
Affaires étrangères (dont le pays assure la présidence
tournante de l'UE), représenterait la Présidence de
l'UE, Louis Michel, commissaire européen et ex-ministre
belge des Affaires étrangères, représenterait la
Commission européenne, Javier Solana, Haut Représentant
de l'Union européenne pour la politique étrangère
- Yémen : Ali Abdallah Saleh, président
- Délégation de la direction palestinienne : Mahmoud
Abbas, chef de l'OLP, Rawhi Fattouh, président par
intérim de l'Autorité palestinienne, Saëb Erakat,
ministre chargé des négociations.
|