Twenty-five U.S.
Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11
From: Paul de Burgh-Day <pdeburgh@eldersnet.com.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:34:55 +1100
OpEdNews
Original Content at
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_080112_twenty_five_u_s__mil.htm
January 14, 2008
Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official
Account of 9/11
By Alan Miller
January 14, 2008 Twenty-five former U.S. military
officers have severely criticized the official account of
9/11 and called for a new investigation. They include
former commander of U.S. Army Intelligence, Major General
Albert Stubblebine, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense, Col. Ronald D. Ray, two former staff members of
the Director of the National Security Agency; Lt. Col.
Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, and Major John M. Newman, PhD,
and many others. They are among the rapidly growing
number of military and intelligence service veterans,
scientists, engineers, and architects challenging the
governments story. The officers statements
appear below, listed alphabetically.
Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD
A lot of these pieces of information, taken
together, prove that the official story, the official
conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. Its
impossible, said Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S.
Air
Force (ret). [1] With doctoral degrees in Aeronautics and
Nuclear Engineering, Col. Bowman served as Director of
Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents
Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.
Theres a second group of facts having to do
with the cover up, continued Col. Bowman. Taken
together these things prove that high levels of our
government dont want us to know what happened and
whos responsible. Who gained from 9/11? Who covered
up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the
patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place?
When you take those three things together, I think the
case is pretty clear that its highly placed
individuals in the administration with all roads passing
through Dick Cheney. Regarding the failure of NORAD
to intercept the four hijacked planes on 9/11, Col.
Bowman said, I'm an old interceptor pilot. I know
the drill. I've done it. I know how long it takes. I know
the rules.
Critics of the government story on 9/11
have said: Well, they knew about this, and they did
nothing. That's not true. If our government had
done nothing that day and let normal procedure be
followed, those planes, wherever they were, would have
been intercepted, the Twin Towers would still be standing
and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive.
[2] During his 22-year Air Force career, Col. Bowman also
served as the Head of the Department of Aeronautical
Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force
Institute of Technology. He also flew over 100 combat
missions in Viet Nam as a fighter pilot.
Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom
Former U.S. Air Force pilot Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom wrote in a
2007 statement to this author, When 9/11 occurred I
bought the entire government and mainstream media story
line. I was a lifelong conservative Republican that voted
for Bush/Cheney, twice. Curiosity about JFKs death,
after a late night TV re-run of Oliver Stones
movie, got me started researching and digging for the
truth about his assassins.
My research led me to a much more important and
timely question: the mystery of what really did happen on
9/11. Everything that seemed real, turned out to be
false. The US government and the news media, once again,
were lying to the world about the real terrorists and the
public murder of 2,972 innocents on 9/11. The
Patriot Act was actually written prior to
9/11 with the intention of destroying the US Constitution
and Bill of Rights. It was passed by Congress, based upon
the government's myth of 9/11, which was in reality a
staged hoax. 9/11 was scripted and executed by rogue
elements of the
military, FAA, intelligence, and private contractors
working for the US government. In addition to
severely curtailing fundamental rights of Americans, the
9/11 crime was then used by this administration, the one
I originally voted for and supported, to justify waging
two preemptive wars (and most likely a third war),
killing over 4,500 American soldiers, and killing over
one million innocent Afghan and Iraqi people. It
was all premeditated. Treason, a false flag military
operation, and betrayal of the trust of the American
people were committed on 9/11 by the highest levels of
the US government and not one person responsible for the
crimes, or the cover-up, has been held accountable for
the last six years. After reading fifteen
well-researched books, studying eight or nine DVD
documentaries, and devoting months of personal research
and investigation, I have arrived at one ultimate
conclusion: The American government and the US
Constitution have been hijacked and subverted by a group
of criminals that today are the real terrorists. They are
in control of the US government and they have all
violated their oaths of office and committed treason
against their own citizens.
Capt. Daniel Davis
Capt. Daniel Davis is a former U.S. Army Air Defense
Officer and NORAD Tac Director. After his military
service, Capt. Davis served for 15 years as a Senior
Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division
and then devoted an additional 15 years as founder and
CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet
engine) services and maintenance company.
In a statement to this author, Capt. Davis wrote, As
a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist
and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering
company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high
temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that
crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned,
shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes,
but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines,
particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft
crashed
on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly,
would be there. Decorated with the Bronze Star and
the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple
Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam, Capt. Davis
also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike
Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee
Defense Area. Capt. Davis continued, Additionally,
in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical
Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a
current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft
on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are
IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from
their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop
communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very
bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no
way all four of them could! Finally, going over the
hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at
the wall/ground interface is difficult for even a small
slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe
the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not
these unskilled terrorists. Attempts to
obscure facts by calling them a Conspiracy Theory
does not change the truth. It seems, Something is
rotten in the State.
Major Jon I. Fox
Major Jon I. Foxis a former U.S. Marine Corps fighter
pilot and a retired commercial airline pilot for
Continental Airlines with a 35-year commercial aviation
career. In 2007, in support of the Architects and
Engineers[3] petition to reinvestigate 9/11, he wrote,
On hearing the military (NORAD/NEAD) excuses for no
intercepts on 9/11/2001, I knew from personal experience
that they were lying. I then began re-checking other
evidence and found mostly more lies from the official
spokesmen. Jet fuel fires at atmospheric pressure
do not get hot enough to weaken steel. Structures do not
collapse through themselves in free fall time with only
gravity as the powering force. [4]
Commander Ralph Kolstad
Retired U.S. Navy Top Gun pilot Commander
Ralph Kolstad started questioning the official account of
9/11 within days of the event. In a statement to this
author, he wrote, It just didnt make any
sense to me, he said. And now six years after 9/11
he says, When one starts using his own mind, and
not what one was told, there is very little to believe in
the official story. [5] Commander Kolstad was a
top-rated fighter pilot during his 20-year Navy career.
Early in his career, he was accorded the honor of being
selected to participate in the Navys Top Gun
air combat school, officially known as the U.S. Navy
Fighter Weapons School. The Tom Cruise movie Top
Gun reflects the experience of the young Navy
pilots at the school. Eleven years later, Commander
Kolstad was further honored by being
selected to become a Top Gun adversary
instructor. Commander Kolstad had a second career after
his 20 years of Navy active and reserve service and
served as a commercial airline pilot for 27 years, flying
for American Airlines and other domestic and
international careers. He flew Boeing 727, 757 and 767,
McDonnell Douglas MD-80, and Fokker F-100 airliners. He
has flown a total of over 23,000 hours in his career.
Commander Kolstad is especially critical of the account
of American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly crashed
into the Pentagon. He says, At the Pentagon, the
pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying. I
have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757s and
767s and I could not have flown it the way the
flight path was described. Commander Kolstad adds,
I was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat
Instructor and have experience flying low altitude, high
speed aircraft. I could not have done what these
beginners did. Something stinks to high heaven! He
points to the physical evidence at the Pentagon impact
site and asks in exasperation, Where is the damage
to the wall of the Pentagon from the wings? Where are the
big pieces that always break away in an accident? Where
is all the luggage? Where are the miles and miles of
wire, cable, and lines that are part and parcel of any
large aircraft? Where are the steel engine parts? Where
is the steel landing gear? Where is the tail section that
would have broken into large pieces? But no major
element of the official account of 9/11 is spared from
Commander Kolstads criticism. Regarding the alleged
impact site of United Airlines Flight 93 near
Shanksville, PA, he asks, Where is any of the
wreckage? Of all the pictures I have seen, there is only
a hole! Where is any piece of a crashed airplane? Why was
the area cordoned off,
and no inspection allowed by the normal accident
personnel? Where is any evidence at all?
Commander Kolstad also questions many aspects of the
attack on the World Trade Center. How could a steel
and concrete building collapse after being hit by a
Boeing 767? Didnt the engineers design it to
withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately
the same size and weight of
the 767? The evidence just doesnt add up.
Why did the second building collapse before the
first one, which had been burning for 20 minutes longer
after a direct hit, especially when the second one hit
was just a glancing blow? If the fire was so hot, then
why were people looking out the windows [6] and in the
destroyed areas? Why have so many members of the New York
Fire Department reported
seeing or hearing many explosions before the
buildings collapsed? Commander Kolstad summarized
his frustration with the investigation and disbelief of
the official account of 9/11, If one were to act as
an accident investigator, one would look at the evidence,
and then construct a plausible scenario as to what led to
the accident. In this case, we were told the story and
then the evidence was built to support
the story. What happened to any intelligent
investigation? Every question leads to another question
that has not been answered by anyone in authority. This
is just the beginning as to why I dont believe the
official story and why I want the truth to be
told.
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski
A Pentagon eye-witness and a former member of the staff
of the Director of the National Security Agency, Lt. Col.
Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret), is a severe
critic of the official account of 9/11. A contributing
author to the 2006 book 9/11 and American Empire:
Intellectuals Speak Out, she wrote, I believe the
[9/11] Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at
hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment
of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to
produce a believable and unbiased summary of what
happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and
even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for
future research. She continued, It is as a
scientist that I have the most trouble with the official
government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not
satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The
collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly
violate the laws of probability and physics. Col.
Kwiatkowski was working in the Pentagon on 9/11 in her
capacity as Political-Military Affairs Officer in the
Office of the Secretary of
Defense when Flight 77 allegedly hit the Pentagon. She
wrote, There was a dearth of visible debris on the
relatively unmarked lawn, where I stood only minutes
after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner
debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the
Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a
large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may
also have been apparent to the Secretary of Defense
[Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the
tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the
Pentagon as a missile. [7] [Secretary
Rumsfeld also publicly referred to Flight 93 as the plane
that was "shot down" over Pennsylvania.[8]
I saw nothing of significance at the point of
impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on
the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke
billowed from within the Pentagon. ... [A]ll of us
staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking
for such debris, but what we expected to see was not
evident. The same is true with regard to the kind
of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of
damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no
larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade
later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40
minutes, with the roof line
remaining relatively straight. The scene, in short,
was not what I would have expected from a strike
by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one
would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. ...
More information is certainly needed regarding the events
of 9/11 and the events leading up to that terrible day.
The improbability of the collapse of World Trade Center
Building 7 is a major concern of these officers and a
growing number of scientists, engineers and architects.
The building was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and would
have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it
was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into
a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on
9/11. In the 6 years since 9/11, the Federal government
has failed to provide any explanation for the collapse.
In addition to the failure to provide an explanation,
absolutely no mention of Building 7s collapse
appears in the 9/11 Commission's full and complete
account of the circumstances surrounding the September
11, 2001 terrorist attacks. [Video of the collapse
can be seen at
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/WTC7_Collapse.wmv>http://www.what
reallyhappened.com/IMAGES/WTC7_Collapse.wmv
]
Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford
Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, U.S. Marine Corps (ret), an
attack pilot with over 300 combat missions, wrote in 2007
to the Michigan Daily,[9] Our government has been
hijacked by means of a new Pearl Harbor and a
lot of otherwise good and decent people who are gullible
enough to think that the first three steel-framed
buildings in history fall down because they have some
fires that the fire fighter on the scene said could be
knocked down with a couple of hoses and through which
people walked before they were photographed looking out
the holes [10] where the plane hit. One of these,
Building 7, was never hit by a plane and even NIST is
ashamed to advance a reason for its collapse. And,
miracle of miracles, these three buildings just happened
to be leased and insured by the same guy who is on tape
[11] saying they decided to PULL the last one
to fall. During his 20 year military career, Col.
Lankford's decorations include the Distinguished Flying
Cross, and 32 awards of the Air Medal. In a statement to
this author, Col. Lankford wrote, September 11,
2001 seems destined to be the watershed event of our
lives and the greatest test for our democracy in our
lifetimes. The evidence of government complicity in the
lead-up to the events, the failure to respond during the
event, and the astounding lack of any meaningful
investigation afterwards, as well as the ignoring of
evidence turned up by others that renders the official
explanation impossible, may signal the end of the
American experiment. It has been used to justify all
manners of measures to legalize repression at home and as
a pretext for behaving as an aggressive empire abroad.
Until we demand an independent, honest, and
thorough investigation and accountability for those whose
action and inaction led to those events and the cover-up,
our republic and our Constitution remain in the gravest
danger.
Lt. Col. Jeff Latas
Another harsh critic of the official account of 9/11 is
Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, U.S. Air Force (ret). A former
combat fighter pilot, Col. Latas is currently a
commercial airline pilot. A highly decorated fighter
pilot, Col. Latas was awarded the Distinguish Flying
Cross for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious
Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals. His
combat experience includes Desert Storm and four tours of
duty in Northern and Southern Watch. During his 20-year
Air Force career, he also served as Pentagon Weapons
Requirement Officer, as a member of the Pentagon's
Quadrennial Defense Review, and as President, U.S. Air
Force Accident Investigation Board. Col. Latas is a
member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth. In 2007 he was
interviewed by the groups founder, commercial
airline pilot, Rob Balsamo,[12] regarding the groups
documentary video, Pandora's Black Box, Chapter 2, Flight
of American 77, [13] which focuses on the 9/11
Commission's account of the impact of Flight 77 at the
Pentagon and discrepancies with the data from the Flight
Data Recorder alleged by the NTSB to be from Flight 77.
In the interview, Col. Latas said, After I did my
own analysis of it, it's obvious that there's
discrepancies between the two stories; between the 9/11
Commission and the flight data recorder information. And
I think that's where we really need to focus a lot of our
attention to get the help that we need in order to put
pressure on government agencies to actually do a real
investigation of 9/11. And not just from a security
standpoint, but from even an aviation standpoint, like
any accident investigation would actually help the
aviators out by finding reasons for things happening.
Col. Latas concluded, And I think that we Americans
need to demand further investigation just to clarify the
discrepancies that you've [Pilots for 9/11 Truth] found.
And I think that we need to be getting on the phone with
our Congressmen and women and letting them know that we
don't accept the excuses that we're hearing now, that we
want true investigators to do a true investigation.
Capt. Eric H. May
Capt. Eric H. May, U.S. Army (ret), is a former Army
Intelligence Officer who also served as an inspector and
interpreter for the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty
team. He is one of many signers of a petition [14]
requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11. In 2005, he wrote:
As a former Army officer, my tendency immediately
after 911 was to rally 'round the colors and defend the
country against what I then thought was an insidious,
malicious all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida. In fact, in
April of 2002, I attempted to reactivate my then-retired
commission to return to serve my country in its time of
peril. ...
Now I view the 911 event as Professor David Griffin,
author of The New Pearl Harbor, views it: as a matter
that implies either
A) passive participation by the Bush White House through
a deliberate stand-down of proper defense procedures that
(if followed) would have led US air assets to a quick
identification and confrontation of the passenger
aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse ...
B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of
government, starting with the White House itself, in
creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the
United States into an invasion of the Middle East ...
[15]
Commander Ted Muga
Commander Ted Muga, U.S. Navy (ret), is a Navy aviator,
who, after retirement, had a second career as a
commercial airline pilot for Pan-Am. In a 2007 interview
on the Alex Jones Show, [16] Commander Muga stated,
The maneuver at the Pentagon was just a tight
spiral coming down out of
7,000 feet. And a commercial aircraft, while they can in
fact structurally somewhat handle that maneuver, they are
very, very, very difficult. And it would take
considerable training. In other words,
commercial aircraft are designed for a particular purpose
and that is for comfort and for passengers and it's not
for military maneuvers. And while they are structurally
capable of doing them, it takes some very, very talented
pilots to do that. ... I just can't imagine an amateur
even being able to come close to performing a maneuver of
that nature. And as far as hijacking the airplanes,
once again getting back to the nature of pilots and
airplanes, there is no way that a pilot would give up an
airplane to hijackers. ... I mean, hell, a guy doesn't
give up a TV remote control much less a complicated 757.
And so to think that pilots would allow a plane to be
taken over by a couple of 5 foot 7, 150 pound guys with a
one-inch blade boxcutter is ridiculous. And also in all
four planes, if you remember, none of the planes ever
switched on their transponder to the hijack code. There's
a very, very simple code that you put in if you suspect
that your plane is being hijacked. It takes literally
just a split-second for you to put your
hand down on the center console and flip it over. And not
one of the four planes ever transponded a hijack code,
which is most, most unusual. ... Commercial airplanes are
very, very complex pieces of machines. And they're
designed for two pilots up there, not just two amateur
pilots, but two qualified commercial pilots up there. And
to think that you're going to get an amateur up into the
cockpit and fly, much less navigate, it to a designated
target, the probability is so low, that it's bordering on
impossible.
Col. George Nelson
In all my years of direct and indirect
participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an
aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that
prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence
to
positively identify the make, model, and specific
registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases
the precise cause of the accident, wrote Col.
George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret), a former U.S.
Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane
parts authority. [17] The government alleges that
four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of
September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than
3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft
evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively
identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it
seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately
kept hidden from public view, continued Col.
Nelson, a graduate of the U.S. Air Force War College and
a 34-year Air Force veteran. With all the evidence
readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any
unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a
Boeing 757 did
not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all
the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it
was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the
obvious hole in the ground and certainly
not the Boeing 757 as alleged.
As painful and
heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the
lingering health problems of thousands more, a most
troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so
many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous
conspiracy in our country's history.
Maj. John M. Newman, PhD
Maj. John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army (ret), is the former
Executive Assistant to the Director of the National
Security Agency. In testimony before a 2005 Congressional
briefing, he said, It falls to me this morning to
bring to your attention the story of Saeed Sheikh, whose
full name is Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and his astonishing
rise to power in Al Qaeda, his crucial role in 9/11,
which is completely, utterly, missing from the 9/11
Commission report
The 9/11 Commission which studied
US intelligence and law enforcement community performance
in great detail, (maybe not so much great detail, but
they did), neglected to cover the communitys
performance during the weeks following the attacks to
determine who was responsible for them, not a word about
that in the Report. The Report does discuss the immediate
US responses but the immediate investigation is never
addressed, and anyone who has closely studied the
post-9/11 investigation knows that the first breakthrough
came two weeks into the investigation when the money
transfers from the United Arab Emirates to the hijackers
were uncovered. Furthermore, if you have studied that
investigation, you know there is no disputing that while
investigators may have struggled with the identity of the
paymaster, they were clear about one thing, he was Al
Qaedas finance chief. For this reason alone you
have to ask why the
9/11 Commission Report never mentions the finance chiefs
role as the 9/11 paymaster. [18]
Capt. Omar Pradhan
Capt. Omar Pradhan, U.S. Air Force, is a former AWACS
command pilot and Flight Instructor at the U.S. Air Force
Academy. In a 2007 statement to this author, Capt.
Pradhan wrote, As a proud American, as a
distinguished USAF E-3 AWACS Aircraft Commander (with
350+ hours of combat time logged over Afghanistan and
Iraq), and as a former U.S. Air Force Academy Flight
Instructor, I warmly endorse the professional inquiry and
pursuit of comprehensive truth sought by the Pilots for
911
Truth organization and the PatriotsQuestion911 website.
Col. Ronald D. Ray
Another senior officer questioning the official account
of 9/11 is Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret),
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President
Ronald Reagan. A highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two
Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart), he was
appointed by President George H. W. Bush to serve on the
American Battle Monuments Commission (1990 1994),
and the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of
Women in the Armed Forces. He was Military Historian and
Deputy Director of Field Operations for the U.S. Marine
Corps Historical Center, Washington, D.C. (1990
1994). In an interview on Alex Jones radio show on
June 30, 2006 [19], Col. Ray described the official
account of 9/11 as the dog that doesnt hunt,
meaning it doesnt stand up to scrutiny. In response
to Alex Jones question, Is it safe to say or
is the statement accurate that you smell something rotten
in the state of Denmark when it comes to 9/11? Col.
Ray replied,I'm astounded that the conspiracy
theory advanced by the administration could in fact be
true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that
that's accurate. That's true.
Col. Razer
After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am
100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001
were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous
perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of
our government. It is now time to take our country back,
wrote Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret), in
a statement to this author. A retired fighter pilot,
served as an instructor at the U.S. Air Force Fighter
Weapons School and NATOs Tactical Leadership
Program and flew combat missions over Iraq. He continued,
The collapse of WTC Building 7 shows
beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned.
There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building
(on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to
report the buildings collapse
before it happened, as BBC News did,[20] unless it was
pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry
Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states
they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we
watched the building collapse.[21] We cannot let
the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military
took an oath to support and defend the Constitution
of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic. Just because we have retired does not
make that oath invalid, so it is not just our
responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real
perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter
how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to
suffer to do it, he concluded.
Maj. Scott Ritter
Maj. Scott Ritter, U.S. Marine Corps, is a former Marine
Corps Intelligence Officer who also served as Chief
Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special
Commission in Iraq 1991 - 1998. In 2005, he said: I,
like the others, are frustrated by the 9/11 Commission
Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the
United States government, both in terms of the executive
branch and the legislative branch when it comes to
putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11
case. [22]
Maj. Douglas Rokke, PhD
Maj. Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret), former Director
of the U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project and 30-year
veteran, had this to say about the explosion at the
Pentagon on 9/11, When you look at the whole thing,
especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the
size of the hole left in the building and the fact the
projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls,
it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at
the damage, it was obviously a missile. [23]
The 9/11 Commission Report asserts that only three of the
alleged hijackers were known to U.S. intelligence
agencies prior to 9/11: Nawaf al-Hazmi, Salem al-Hazmi,
and Khalid al-Mihdar. There is no mention in the Report
that the names and photographs of alleged hijacker Marwan
al-Shehhi and alleged ring-leader Mohamed Atta had been
identified by the Department of Defense anti-terrorist
program known as Able Danger more than a year prior to
9/11 and that they were known to be affiliates of
al-Qaida. Able Danger also identified Nawaf al-Hazmi and
Khalid al-Mihdar.
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer
In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee in
2006 [24], Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, U.S. Army Reserve,
former Chief of the Armys Controlled HUMINT (Human
Intelligence) Program, overseeing Army Intelligence and
Security Commands global controlled HUMINT efforts,
stated: [B]asic law enforcement investigative
techniques, with 21st Century data mining and analytical
tools ... resulted in the establishment of a new form of
intelligence collection and the identification of
Mohammed Atta and several other of the 9-11 terrorists as
having links to Al Qaeda leadership a full year in
advance of the attacks. ... After contact by two separate
members of the ABLE DANGER team,
the 9-11
[Commission] staff refused to perform any in-depth review
or investigation of the issues that were identified to
them.
It was their job to do a thorough
investigation of these claims to not simply
dismiss them based on what many now believe was a preconceived
conclusion to the 9-11 story they wished to tell.
I consider this a failure of the 9-11 staff a
failure that the 9-11 Commissioners themselves were
victimized by and continue to have perpetrated on
them by the staff as is evidenced by their recent,
groundless conclusion that ABLE DANGERs findings
were urban legend. A 23-year military
intelligence veteran, Col. Shaffer was recently awarded
the Bronze Star for bravery in Afghanistan. In a 2005
interview on Fox News, Col Shaffer asked, Why did
this operation, which was created in '99 to target Al
Qaeda globally, offensively, why was that turned off in
the Spring of 2001, four months before we were attacked?
I can't answer that, either. I can tell you I was ordered
out of the operation directly by a two-star general.
[25]
Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, U.S.
Supporting Col. Shaffers statement, Capt. Scott J.
Phillpott, U.S. Navy, currently Commanding Officer of the
guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf and former head of
the Able Danger data mining program, stated in 2005:
I will not discuss this outside of my chain of
command. I have briefed the Department of the Army, the
Special Operations Command and the office of
(Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence) Dr. Cambone
as well as the 9/11 Commission. My story has remained
consistent. Atta was identified by Able Danger in
January/February 2000. [26] Capt. Phillpott is a
U.S. Naval Academy graduate, who during his 23 years of
Navy service has been awarded the Legion of Merit,
Defense Meritorious Service Medal, three Meritorious
Service Medals, the Joint Service Commendation Medal, two
Navy Commendation Medals, and the Navy Achievement Medal.
Joel Skousen
Former U.S. Marine Corps fighter pilot Joel M. Skousen
also questions the official account of 9/11. After his
military service, Mr. Skousen served as Chairman of the
Conservative National Committee in Washington DC and
Executive Editor of Conservative Digest. In the
March 2005 issue, PM [Popular Mechanics] magazine singled
out 16 issues or claims of the 9/11 skeptics that point
to government collusion and systematically attempted to
debunk each one. Of the 16, most missed the mark and
almost half were straw men arguments - either ridiculous
arguments that few conspiracists believed or restatements
of the arguments that were highly distorted so as to make
them look weaker than
they really were. ... I am one of those who claim
there are factual arguments pointing to conspiracy, and
that truth is not served by taking cheap shots at those
who see gaping flaws in the government story ... There is
significant evidence that the aircraft impacts did not
cause the collapse [of the
Twin Towers] ... The issues of the penetration hole [at
the Pentagon] and the lack of large pieces of debris
simply do not jive with the official story, but they are
explainable if you include the parking lot video evidence
that shows a huge white explosion at impact. This cannot
happen with an aircraft laden only with fuel. It can only
happen in the presence of high explosives. [27]
Gen. Albert Stubblebine
Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret), former
Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security
Command (INSCOM), is a strong critic of the official
account of 9/11. In a 2006 video documentary he said,
One of my experiences in the Army was being in
charge of the Armys Imagery Interpretation for
Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold
War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from
photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the
Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was
supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, The
plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit
the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?
[28] During his 32-year Army career, Gen. Stubblebine
also commanded the U.S.
Armys Electronic Research and Development Command
and the U.S. Armys Intelligence School and Center.
Gen. Stubblebine is one of the inductees into the
Military Intelligence Hall of Fame. [29]
Col. James R. Uhl,
There is a well-organized cover-up of the events of
11 Sep 2001. The 9/11 Commission was a white-washed
farce. There is evidence that US Government officials had
advance knowledge of and are probably implicated in the
events of 9/11, wrote retired military physician,
Col. James R. Uhl, MD, U.S. Army (ret), in a statement to
this author. A huge body of physical evidence has
been ignored, suppressed, and ridiculed by the media and
by our Government. Why did WTC 7 collapse? It
was never hit by an airplane and was apparently brought
down by explosives. How could Al-Qaida terrorists have
had access and time to plant bombs in a top secret
installation? Why did the 9/11 Commission fail to seek
the reason for the WTC 7 collapse? continued Col.
Uhl, a 38-year Army veteran, who served in several
theaters of operations, from Viet Nam through Iraq.
Capt. Russ Wittenberg
Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force, is a former U.S.
Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions and
a retired commercial pilot, who flew for Pan Am and
United Airlines for 35 years.
According to Capt. Wittenberg, The government story
they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S., plain and
simple.[30] In the 2007 documentary video, 9/11
Ripple Effect,[31] he said I flew the two actual
aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number
175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in
Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that's alleged
to have hit the South Tower.
I don't believe it's possible for, like I said, for
a terrorist, a so-called terrorist, to train on a
[Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class
cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral
navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds
exceeding its design limit speed by well over 100 knots,
make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding -- pulling
probably 5, 6, 7 G's. And the aircraft would literally
fall out of the sky. I couldn't do it and I'm absolutely
positive they couldn't do it. [32]
Regarding Flight 77, which allegedly hit the Pentagon,
Capt. Wittenberg said, The airplane could not have
flown at those speeds which they said it did without
going into what they call a high speed stall. The
airplane wont go that fast if you start pulling
those high G maneuvers at those bank angles.
To
expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with
a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous ...
Its roughly a 100 ton airplane. And an airplane
that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have
100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a
building. There was no wreckage from a 757 at the
Pentagon.
The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was
not Flight 77. We think, as you may have heard before, it
was a cruise missile.[33]
Col. Ann Wright
Another senior officer questioning the official account
of 9/11 is Col. Ann Wright, U.S. Army (ret), who said in
a 2007 interview with Richard Greene on the Air America
Radio Network, It's incredible some of these things
that still are unanswered. The 9/11 Report -- that was
totally inadequate. I mean the questions that anybody has
after reading that. [34] Col. Wright is one of
three U.S. State Department officials to publicly resign
in direct protest of the invasion of Iraq in March, 2003.
She
served for 13 years on active duty and 16 additional
years on reserve duty in the U.S. Army. She joined the
Foreign Service in 1987 and served for 16 years as a U.S.
Diplomat. She served as Deputy Chief of Mission of U.S.
Embassies in Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Afghanistan and
she helped reopen the U.S. Embassy in Kabul in December,
2001. She continued in her interview: How could our
national intelligence and defense operations be so inept
that they could not communicate; that
they could not scramble jets; that they could not take
defensive action? And I totally agree. I always thought
the Pentagon had all sorts of air defense sort of
equipment around it; that they could take out anything
that was coming at it. And for a plane to be able to just
fly low right over Washington and slam into that thing is
just -- I mean, you still just shake your head. How in
the world could that happen?
Capt. Gregory Zeigler
Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, is a former U.S. Army
Intelligence Officer. In a 2006 statement to this author,
Capt. Zeigler wrote, I knew from September 18,
2001, that the official story about 9/11 was
false. That was when I realized that the perpetrators had
made a colossal blunder in collapsing the South Tower
first, rather than the North Tower, which had been hit
more directly and earlier. Other anomalies poured
in rapidly: the hijackers' names appearing in none of the
published flight passenger lists, BBC reports of stolen
identities of the alleged hijackers or the alleged
hijackers being found
alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC 1 and 2 and WTC 7,
the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the
Pentagon, the impossibility of ordinary cell phone (as
opposed to Airfone) calls being made consistently from
passenger aircraft at cruising altitude, etc., etc., etc.
Shortly after the release of the 9/11 Commission Report,
a group of over
100 prominent Americans signed a petition [35] urging
Congress to
immediately reinvestigate 9/11. In addition to two former
senior CIA
officials [36] and several U.S. State Department
veterans, [37] the
signers included Lt. Col. Robert Bowman and Capt. Eric H.
May, both
mentioned above.
The petition stated, in part, We want truthful
answers to questions
such as:
1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing
with hijacked
airliners not followed that day?
2. Why were the extensive missile batteries and air
defenses reportedly
deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the
attack?
3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his
elementary
school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or
that of the
schoolchildren?
4. Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized,
or reprimanded for
the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?
5. Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad
published the results
of multiple investigations into trading that strongly
suggested
foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks,
resulting in tens
of millions of dollars of traceable gains?
These questions and many others still remain unanswered
three years
after the petition was submitted and six years after the
terrible events
of 9/11. As the statements of these twenty-five former
U.S. military
officers demonstrate, the need for a new thorough, and
independent
investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan
politics, nor the
demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans.
It is instead
a matter of the utmost importance for Americas
security and the future
of the entire world.
Statements questioning the official account of 9/11 and
calls for a new investigation by more than 800 credible
individuals can be found at <http://PatriotsQuestion911.com>http://PatriotsQuestion911.com
Additional information about prominent skeptics of the
official account of 9/11 can be found in the author's
other articles on this subject, listed below.
Jan. 5, 2008 - Eight U.S. State Department Veterans
Challenge Official
Account of 9/11 - Official Account of 9/11: Flawed,
Absurd, Totally
Inadequate, a Cover-up featured
statements by:
Daniel Ellsberg, PhD, former U.S. State Department envoy
to Viet Nam and
Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of Defense
Col. Ann Wright, former Deputy Chief of Mission of U.S.
Embassies in
Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Afghanistan. 16 years as
U.S. Diplomat.
29-year U.S. Army career.
Fred Burks, former simultaneous interpreter for President
Bill Clinton
and George W. Bush and others. 18-year State Department
career
Melvin Goodman, PhD, former Senior Analyst, Bureau of
Intelligence and
Research, State Department. Later served as Division
Chief, CIAs Office
of Soviet Affairs and Professor of International
Security, National War
College
Michael Springmann, retired career Foreign Service
Officer. Former
Consular Officer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. 20-year career
with the State
Department and the International Foreign Trade
Administration, Commerce
Department
George Kenney, former career Foreign Service Officer.
Served as Yugoslav
desk officer at the State Department headquarters.
Michael Mennard, PhD, retired career Foreign Service
Officer. Served as
Regional Public Affairs Officer in India
Edward Peck, former Deputy Coordinator, Covert
Intelligence Programs,
U.S. State Department. Later served as Deputy Director of
the White
House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald
Reagan. Former U.S.
Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq
Dec. 13, 2007 - Seven Senior Federal Engineers and
Scientists Call for
New 9/11 Investigation - Official Account of 9/11: Impossible,
A
Bunch of Hogwash, Fatally Flawed
featured statements by: Lt. Col.
Robert Bowman, PhD, Director of Advanced Space Programs
Development
under Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. Former
Head of the
Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean
at the U.S.
Air Force Institute of Technology
David Griscom, PhD, Retired Research Physicist. Served 33
years at the
Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C.
Joel Hirschhorn, PhD, Former Senior Staff Member,
Congressional Office
of Technology Assessment. Former Director of Environment,
Energy and
Natural Resources for the National Governors Association
Enver Masud, MS, PE, Former Chief of the Strategic and
Emergency
Planning Branch, U.S. Department of Energy
James Quintiere, PhD, Former Chief of the Fire Science
Division of the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Dwain Deets, MS, Former Director, Aerospace Projects at
NASAs Dryden
Flight Research Center
Edward S. Munyak, MS, PE, Former Fire Protection Engineer
for the U.S.
Departments of Energy, Defense, and Veterans Affairs.
Contributing
Subject Matter Expert to the U.S. Department of Energy
Fire Protection
Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard for
Nuclear Facilities
Dec. 4, 2007 - Eight Senior Republican Appointees
Challenge Official
Account of 9/11 - Not Possible, a
Whitewash, False featured
statements by
Paul Craig Roberts, PhD, Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury under
President Ronald Reagan
Catherine Austin Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing
under President
George H.W. Bush
Morgan Reynolds, PhD, Chief Economist of the U.S.
Department of Labor
under current President George W. Bush
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret), Deputy
Assistant Secretary
of Defense under President Ronald Reagan
Mary Schiavo, JD, Inspector General of the U.S.
Department of
Transportation under Presidents George H.W. Bush and
William Clinton
Barbara Honegger, Special Assistant to the Chief Domestic
Policy Adviser
to President Ronald Reagan and White House Policy Analyst
Edward Peck, Deputy Director of the White House Task
Force on Terrorism
under President Ronald Reagan. Former Deputy Coordinator,
Covert
Intelligence Programs at the U.S. State Department.
Former U.S.
Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq
Morton Goulder, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Intelligence
and Warning under Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford
and Jimmy Carter
Sept. 23, 2007 - Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11
Commission Report -
Official Account of 9/11 a Joke and a Cover-up
featured statements
by CIA veterans Raymond McGovern, William Christison,
Melvin Goodman,
Robert Baer, Robert David Steele, Lynne Larkin, and David
MacMichael.
Sept. 5, 2007 - U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11,
featured the
statement of Commander Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy Top
Gun pilot.
Sept. 4, 2007 - Former Congressional Office of Technology
Assessment
Senior Staff Member Calls for New Investigation of 9/11
featured the
statement of Joel S. Hirschhorn, Ph.D., who served for 12
years as a
Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of
Technology Assessment
and later as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural
Resources for
the National Governors Association.
Aug. 27, 2007 - National Academy of Sciences Member Calls
for New 9/11
Investigation featured the statement of Lynn Margulis,
Ph.D., world
renowned scientist.
Aug. 21, 2007 - Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science
Division Calls for
Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation
featured the
statement of James Quintiere, Ph.D., one of the world's
leading fire
science researchers.
July 16, 2007 - Former California Seismic Safety
Commissioner Endorses
9/11 Truth Movement featured the statement of J. Marx
Ayres, former
member of the National Institute of Sciences Building
Safety Council and
former member of the California Seismic Safety
Commission.
Endnotes
[1] Video of speech by Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD Sept.
11, 2004
<http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674>http
://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674
[2] Video of speech by Lt. Col. Robert Bowman at the
American Scholars
Symposium: 9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda June 25, 2006
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKoqEQ7hb_4
[3] Architects and Engineers Petition to Reinvestigate
9/11 Signed by
More Than 230 Architects and Engineers 2007
http://www.ae911truth.org/joinus.php
[4] Statement by Maj. Jon Fox in support of Architects
and Engineers
petition 2007
http://www.ae911truth.org/profile.php?uid=998894
[5] U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11 by Alan
Miller Sept. 5, 2007
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070905_u_s__navy__top_gun__.htm
[6] Photos of WTC victim, Edna Cintron, waving inside
impact hole in
World Trade Center North Tower
http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#Cintron
[7] U.S. Department of Defense News Transcript Secretary
Rumsfeld
Interview with Parade Magazine Oct. 12, 2001
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3845
[8] Speech by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in
Baghdad Dec. 24, 2004
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6Xoxaf1Al0
[9] Letter to the editor of the Michigan Daily by Lt.
Col. Shelton
Lankford Feb. 5, 2007
http://www.michigandaily.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticleComments&
ustory_id=ddcccb1d-e57d-416e-928a-da5591786272#542c84e6-9719-4cfc-880c-6ceca6fad92e
[10] Photos of WTC victim, Edna Cintron, waving inside
impact hole in
World Trade Center North Tower
http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#Cintron
[11] Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges by Paul
Joseph Watson
Jan. 5, 2006
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinanswers.htm
[12] Audio recording of interview of Lt. Col. Jeff Latas
by Rob Balsamo
June 25, 2007
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1858087487546809825&q=jeff+latas
&total=14&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=5
[13] Video documentary Pandora's Black Box, Chapter 2,
Flight of
American 77 by Pilots for 9/11 Truth
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8672066571196607580&q=pandora%
27s+black+box&total=42&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
[14] Petition to Reinvestigate 9/11 Signed by Over 100
Prominent
Americans Oct. 26, 2004
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
[15] The American Reichstag Fire - 911 and
Non-investigation by Capt.
Eric May 2005
http://mujca.com/captain.htm
[16] Interview of Commander Ted Muga on the Alex Jones
Show April 11, 2007
http://prisonplanet.tv/members/audio/110407muga.mp3
(Subscription required)
[17] Impossible to Prove a Falsehood True: Aircraft Parts
as a Clue to
their Identity by Col. George Nelson, MBA
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
[18] Testimony of Maj. John M. Newman, PhD, Congressional
Briefing: The
9/11 Commission Report One Year later July 22,
2005
http://www.vt911.org/McKinneyReport20050722transcript.pdf
[19] Radio interview of Col. Ronald D. Ray by Alex Jones,
June 30, 2006
( Subscription required.) Summarized in July 1, 2006
article on
propagandamatrix.com
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2006/010706doesnthunt.htm
[20] Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26
Minutes In
Advance by Paul Joseph Watson
Feb. 28, 2007
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/280207timestamp.htm
[21] Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges by Paul
Joseph Watson
Jan. 5, 2006
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinanswers.htm
[22] Video recording of statement by Maj. Scott Ritter
July 22, 3006
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1232419751782017310&q=%22ray+mcgovern%22&hl=en
[23] Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near
Pentagon After
9/11 Indicate Depleted Uranium Used by Greg Szymanski
Aug. 18, 2005
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/18-Aug-2005.html
[24] Testimony of Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer before the
Armed Services
Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, Feb. 15,
2006
http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/testimony/251.pdf
[25] Interview of Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer on Fox News
Aug. 24, 2005
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1956542165192088795&hl=en
[26] Navy Captain Backs Able Danger Claims, Fox News Aug.
23, 2005
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166504,00.html
[27] Debunking The Debunkers by Joel Skousen Feb. 14,
2005
http://www.rense.com/general62/deun.htm
[28] Video documentary, One Nation Under Siege Gen.
Albert Stubblebines
statement can be viewed at
http://www.undersiegemovie.com/media/stubblebine.wmv
[29] Military Intelligence Hall of Fame Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Intelligence_Hall_of_Fame
[30] Former Vietnam Combat and Commercial Pilot Firm
Believer 9/11 Was
Inside Government Job by Greg Szymanski July 17, 2005
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/17-Jul-2005.html
[31] Video documentary 9/11 Ripple Effect by William
Lewis and Dave
vonKleist August, 2007
http://www.911rippleeffect.com/
[32] Pilot who flew 2 planes used on 9/11 doesn't believe
official story
by American Buddhist Net Sept. 13, 2007
http://americanbuddhist.net/pilot-who-flew-2-planes-used-9-11-doesnt-believe-official-story
[33] Interview of Capt. Russ Wittenberg Sept. 16, 2004
http://911underground.com/WING_TV_2004-09-16_Russ_Wittenberg_Interview.MP3
[34] Interview of Col. Ann Wright and Laurie Van Auken by
Richard Greene
on the Clout show on Air America Radio Network Sept. 11,
2007
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/aacl091107.mp3
[35] Petition to Reinvestigate 9/11 Signed by Over 100
Prominent
Americans Oct. 26, 2004
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
[36] Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report
by Alan Miller
Sept. 23, 2007
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070922_seven_cia_veterans_c.htm
[37] Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the
Official Account
of 9/11 by Alan Miller Jan. 5, 2008
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_080104_eight_u_s__state_dep.htm
Authors Website: www.PatriotsQuestion911.com
Authors Bio: Alan Miller is author of the website
http://www.PatriotsQuestion911.com
FROM:
Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph
+61 7 41262296
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers
|