THE HANDSTAND | JANUARY 2008 |
stop-press stop-press stop-press!! COMMENT http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5573#more-5573 ... Phil said on 1/18/2008 @ 5:08
am PT... I sent WMUR-TV a
message..
"Recount Finds No Voting Problems So Far." to: Why lie to the people? No voting problems? Are you freaking kidding me no voting problems? What was the source for that information, admit it really you just make it up out of thin air, that's not journalism, that's not news that's pure lies and propaganda. The simple fact that there is even ONE vote off is serious problem. Everyone in corporate media is touting these crappy electronic voting machines as some kind of perfect thing. They have failed over and over time again and again. This isn't some kind of joke. This is National Security. People can die because of these decisions. You better get schooled on what journalism is. You might try here: New Hampshire If all you care about profits, and deceiving your local public, you don't serve the public interest and don't deserve a license to broadcast. Now even the most mentally disabled among us could easily point to: http://www.sos.nh.gov/recountresults.htm And see for some of the results are off by more that fifty! 50 points man!? WMUR-TV Recount Finds No Voting Problems with a more than 50 point change!? Wow man, your headline just got worse. I just pointed some data to you, you know where the frigging page is not, so your journalists can get on the ball and correct your lying propaganda webpage: http://www.wmur.com/news/15078710/detail.html Stop pretending to
be the news media. And you also talk about rumors from voting groups. I say your the one making up the rumors. After all you should just say who your sources are. And if your talking about arresting Garner maybe you should send one of your journalists into your own public law library with a couple big gulps and some coffee to read your own laws on why that might have been so. Could it be he was breaking his own laws? (that really wasn't meant as a question) Garner should not be trusted. Voting is not based on trust. I don't care if you have Jesus of Nazareth working as your Secretary of State, even he should not be trusted. That's why theres something called public oversight, but WMUR has lost that concept due to it's desire for corporate profits, it no longer serves the public interest. And really if that's the way you want it to stay, then there really is no reason for WMUR to even have a frequency allocated to it by the FCC, since they are public airwaves, and your promising to be in the public interest, yet time and time again you are not serving the public interest. If you really were
serving the public interest you would be 1. Outlaw electronic
vote tabulation devices. But you do not serve the public interest. You do not deserve a license for your station. I am going to let people know (right now) to come into your station and have at your Public File because you do not serve their interest. Sure you might have an email contact, and you might be able to re-edit your webpage, but you can't change what's in your public file when you go for a license renewal. Got ya there. Have a nice day now. (For others that haven't sent them a message, I can say without a doubt it feels good to really let them have a piece of your mind. It's too bad I don't actually live there, I would visit their public books every day.) Grizzly Bear
Dancer said on 1/17/2008 @ 10:57 pm PT... Keep trusting recount numbers put up by convicted felons with ties to the criminal 1%ers in office who cheated to win in 2000 and 2004. Their inaccurate riggable electronic computer totals were counted and then stored in secrecy by diebold. Keep wearing a fcking question mark on yer forhead Americans. Keep allowing this to be the status quo for an American election let alone the presidential and enjoy the treason. Pre-empted wars, questionable policies favoring the corporate 1% and your loss of rights as American citizens was to fcking easy to get away with. Brought to you by the someone who knows that "white" alqueda terrorists who got away with taking out Federal World Trade Tower building #7 ON 9/11 IN 7 SECONDS without the help of any airplanes or arabs 10 1/2 hours after the other 2 Federal World Trade Towers fell are still running this country. To be clear, the bush/cheney terrorists responsible are still is office. I command thee to impeach, and remove President Bush and Vice President Cheney from office stripping them of all their Executive powers immediately. They can take their Alberto Gonzalez defensive strategy to a world court hearing their case to try and explain away their despicable 7 yr anti-environmental agenda to destroy our land and planet in the name of greed, obvious treasonous activies against the American people, and the numberous high crimes and misdemeanors offenses they will prosecuted for. Findings will be: Consecutive life sentences for the bush/cheney administration and their accomplices who retired early to spend more time with their families. Abolish electronic
computer voting machines and an election process that
allows votes to be counted in secrecy without
transparency. ........................................................ The stripped-out shell of a heart has been made to work again - using brand new cells planted inside it. Scientists removed all the muscle cells in a rat heart, leaving just a "scaffold" of other tissues such as blood vessels and valves. When the University of Minnesota team added heart cells, they quickly grew and produced a pumping action. It is hoped the Nature Medicine study will ultimately mean human or animal hearts can be crafted for transplant. Experts believe that failing organs in humans could in theory be replaced by new versions grown using stem cells. These are the body's master cells, which have the potential to be transformed into any cell type in the body. Any organ constructed in this way would have a significant advantage over donor organs for transplantation because they could be made to match the patient, and face a much smaller risk of rejection by the immune system. However, one of the biggest obstacles to developing three-dimensional organs is finding a way to persuade cells to form the complex structures needed. The Minnesota researchers decided that the best template would be another heart. They took an adult rat heart, bathed it in detergents which removed all the cardiac cells, leaving a "frame" of other heart tissues forming the basic shape of the organ. This frame was then "seeded" with cardiac cells taken from a newborn rat, and kept in lab conditions designed to simulate the growing heart. In just four days, the cells had multiplied and spread to such an extent that the researchers could see contractions in the new muscle tissue. By the eight day, the home-grown hearts were capable of pumping, albeit at only 2% of the power of a normal rat heart. Dr Doris Taylor, who led the experiment, suggested that it might change the way scientists think about producing artificial organs. "It opens a door to this notion that you can make any organ: kidney, liver, lung, pancreas - you name it and we hope we can make it." Another researcher, Dr Harald Ott, said: "When we saw the first contractions we were speechless." Professor Sian Harding, from Imperial College London, who is working on ways to repair failing human hearts with new heart cell "patches", described the technique as "potentially a real advance".She said that it might be possible in the future to remove the cells from a pig heart - which is very similar in scale and function to a human heart. Human stem cells could then be seeded to produce an organ capable of being transplanted into humans. She added: "Heart muscle cells need so much oxygen, that each of them has to be virtually touching a blood vessel, and achieving that kind of level of blood supply is a challenge. If you could use the existing blood vessel structure from another heart, that would be really useful." Dr Peter Weissberg of the British Heart Foundation said that the research was "important", but cautioned that it would be some time before the technique could be use for human transplant organs. "This isn't something that we will see in man for at least a decade, I believe," he said. "First we have to find a way of getting hold of the patient's own stem cells so that the new heart is not rejected." Dr Jon Frampton Wellcome Trust Senior Fellow at the University of Birmingham said: "Although this is only a first step requiring considerable follow-up development, the study nevertheless represents an exciting breakthrough that will eventually make the prospect of repairing damaged hearts a reality and will also be an approach that can be extended to other organs." |